
City Killing Off The Grass In The Center Of Oak Ave Pkwy
#1
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:46 PM
What do you all think about the City killing off the grassy center section in the middle of Oak Ave Pkwy in the Lexington Hills development. There are signs along the section saying they want to remove the grass to conserve water and such. Considering the state of the lake and economic reasons I don't see it unreasonable. Just concerned about what the new area will look like and hope it doesn't lower the value of the surrounding community. The grass has been there as long as I have lived in Lexington Hills, since '89. I will greatly miss the excess water running off all over the street that always seems to be on right after I wash my truck.
but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming
"Wow! What a Ride!"
weservicepools.com
#2
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:51 PM
#3
Posted 29 January 2009 - 09:15 PM
#4
Posted 29 January 2009 - 09:21 PM
#5
Posted 29 January 2009 - 10:01 PM
#6
Posted 30 January 2009 - 08:17 AM
I would think all water leaks would be a priority.
M.E.G.
Mechelle Reasoner (formerly Gooch)
Movin'...So You Can!
Morris Williams Realty
Call or txt: 916 955-8698,
Read my blog, search for homes, find out more about Folsom at FolsomCorner.com
#7
Posted 30 January 2009 - 08:25 AM
you can actually have a very green looking front yard in our climate without grass. There are lots of plants that will be lush year round and even flower during different seasons. You do have to water them for the first three years (not as much as a lawn takes though) and then only when its super hot (over 105) deeply once a month. These types of lawns also can feed birds, bees, and butterflies better than a rock and gravel yard, so it feels alive.
There are numerous varieties of rosemary (upright, creeping, blue, purple, etc.), hawthorne, butterfly bush, fortnight lily, western red bud, guara, citrus trees, juniper and cedar trees, in fact lots of trees. and, better yet, it doesn't have to be mowed! less pollution and expense right there! just a pruning now and again in winter and you're good to go.
maybe you could ask your neighbors how they feel about it. they might be thinking the same thing. I have also seen really nice designs where they start by minimizing the size of the lawn until they're comfortable with the change.
#8
Posted 30 January 2009 - 08:27 AM
I would think all water leaks would be a priority.
M.E.G.
Agree that sounds like it is certainly breaking at least 2 or 3 of the Stage 2 and 3 water restrictions.
#9
Posted 30 January 2009 - 08:32 AM
#10
Posted 30 January 2009 - 04:43 PM
#11
Posted 30 January 2009 - 06:07 PM
There are numerous varieties of rosemary (upright, creeping, blue, purple, etc.), hawthorne, butterfly bush, fortnight lily, western red bud, guara, citrus trees, juniper and cedar trees, in fact lots of trees. and, better yet, it doesn't have to be mowed! less pollution and expense right there! just a pruning now and again in winter and you're good to go.
maybe you could ask your neighbors how they feel about it. they might be thinking the same thing. I have also seen really nice designs where they start by minimizing the size of the lawn until they're comfortable with the change.
I actually did a red lava rock (small stone) front yard with white (small stone) as a border. It looked real nice.
#12
Posted 30 January 2009 - 06:09 PM
You are so right. Mine has been off for the last two weeks.
#13
Posted 30 January 2009 - 08:34 PM
I haven't watered since the first week in October
#14
Posted 30 January 2009 - 08:37 PM
#15
Posted 30 January 2009 - 10:48 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users