PG&E has decided to build a gas monitoring station in the historic district and is using eminent domain to acquire the property. The project is real and moving forward, and the City has already agreed to a similar station outside of the historic district. The purpose is to build a "pigging" input station near the old truss bridge, and the output station a few miles away.
First of all, the use of eminent domain is very unfair to the owner of the property who does not want to sell, and risks property values for the neighborhood.
Second, the residents of the HD are required to comply with design guidelines, and PG&E is exempt. They can install an ugly station that is visible to all and negatively impacts the charm of the neighborhood, and may negatively affect property values as well.
Third, the reason for this is to test the high pressure gas main that runs up Bridge Street to the middle school, around the school and through Folsom. Will PG&E share test data with the City, and if so, how will the City communicate that information with residents?
How is the City going to inform the community of the project and annual test results?
I hope the residents of the historic district are aware of what is under their streets, and that the community knows about the high pressure gas pipe that borders two sides of the middle school. The pipes are old and have been re-pressurized. Now PG&E is increasing monitoring and forcibly taking a neighbor's land. If they are using eminent domain, then they should explain why they chose the location and not on the other side of the river where they can test the entire pipe, including the section that runs over Rainbow Bridge. Seems to me that the old pipe on the bridge is worth testing and that the City would want to protect the bridge as it is critical to traffic. Just saying, why test only part of the line?
I attached a map of the gas line and two photos of the unattractive PIG station in San Lorenzo, CA.