Should Mrs. Kinsella sue the school district??? I would rather she didn't because we can't afford a costly litigation but only she can decide whether she wants to pursue her rights or waive them. We can't tell her what to do. I would however warn anyone who speaks badly of her and/or discloses personal information on this board about her or her family in a derogatory manner (that isn't true) because you may find yourself on the other end of your own lawsuit with Ms. Kinsella. I also think her kids should definitely be off limits with respect to comments about this issue. This is not their battle but their mother's battle. Please leave them alone.
I decided to edit my post because after putting more thought into this issue, I think that this lawsuit would only benefit Mrs. Kinsella's lawyers and hurt the kids it is/was supposed to help. If the premise of this lawsuit was due to an administrative error or misunderstanding, than that could easily be fixed through communication with the people with the power to correct the error or make amends for the misunderstanding. I believe she should try to mitigate whatever damages she feels she has incurred and try working with the school FIRST before filing a lawsuit.
The District will most likely settle with Mrs. Kinsella's lawyers than drag this into Court because it would cost more to try this case than the amount of "damages" Mrs. Kinsella could allege she has incurred, if any. Mrs. Kinsella's lawyers will take one-third of whatever settlement she gets plus attorney's fees and costs and she gets whatever is left - not much. The "Class" gets $2 - $3.00 tops (sarcasm).
As for a "class" action lawsuit, I'd like to know how many parents of students at FCUSD would volunteer their names to be in a Class action where they get nothing from it and their kids suffer the cost of the lawsuit by having the programs pulled by the school?????? I for one am part of that class and don't agree with filing a lawsuit against the school my kids attend and risk losing the extracurricular programs that it offers. I'm against the lawsuit because I know the only people that would benefit from this is the lawyers and maybe Mrs. Kinsella and the only ones that would suffer the cost of it would be my kids and the other kids at the school - even Mrs. Kinsella's kids if they attend FCUSD schools. This lawsuit would simply be lining the pockets of the lawyers and stripping the school and the students of whatever programs they are in.
Frankly, our school would not have the programs it has now if the parents did not "DONATE" a portion of the cost for these programs. Call it (donation, fees, costs) whatever you want, without the parents' INVESTMENT/PARTICIPATION in their kids' educational experience, you would have what I am about to describe below.
Looking back at my children's experience and attending some of their athletic games, I was able to see how the other schools placed the importance of extracurricular for their kids. I was frankly appalled that some of these schools had little to no effort put into their programs either through parent or faculty participation. My son played football against one school in South Sacramento where NOT ONE PARENT, NOT ONE STUDENT, NOT ONE STAFF MEMBER for the other team was present at the game. (I don't even remember seeing a coach out there for the other team.) It was pathetic and I felt so terribly bad for the kids on the other team because on our side of the field the stands were filled with Bulldog parents, coaches and a few staff members. It even rained heavily that game and the winds picked up and the parents still persevered at the game. Not one bulldog parent left. In fact, even the other teams' cheerleading squad was disorganized, did not know any cheers and just stood their chatting amongst themselves. They did not yell one cheer for their team during the whole game! Needless to say, the other team lost that day but I think they had lost before they ever stepped foot on that field.
After the game was over, I observed that some of the parents of the other team started showing up in the parking lot to pick up their kids. Most drove very nice cars, nice big rims, some spinners, large SUV's and I wondered why not one of them came out to support their kids. Not ONE. Now, as I look back on that day, I wonder why they did not INVEST as much on their kids and their extracurricular activities than they did on their cars. That game still pisses me off because I could see the dissappointment on those kids faces. They lost before they even stepped on that field.
Simply put, some parents value $$$$ and material possessions more than we do our kids and their education. Gov. Schwarznegger (whatever on his spelling - I don't care) (attitude moment) has made it clear to the State of California that even HE does not value our kids education. In fact, he places more value on making sure we have nicer, wider and more roads to drive our bigger more expensive cars all over the State. By the way, his kids are in private schools so he could care less how his constituents' kids are being educated. If you poll most politicians, you will find most of their kids are in private schools. So they don't care. It is up to US as parents to fund our children's educational experience.
So, I've come to the conclusion that if parents do not feel that they have to INVEST any money on their kids' educational experience at the school (and they have the financial means to do so), maybe they need to look at their priorities.
Maybe that Lexus or Hummer in the garage isn't such a priority or NEED. Maybe building the pool in the backyard could wait till Johnny's out of high school. Maybe that vacation to Europe could wait another year. What about going without fake nails for a year or a mocha for 6 months?
At this day and age, it is unrealistic to expect the School District to fund all of the extracurricular activities WE PARENTS WANT OUR CHILDREN TO BE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE IN when the school can't even purchase updated books or are barely scraping by on what they have to keep the school functioning.
The extracurricular activities at the school are for the benefit of our kids. Investing some money for their experience is a necessity. The school is NOT required to have those activities available and could easily shut them down due to budget cuts. Which would you prefer? Suing the school and inevitably having to shut down programs because parents refuse to put any money into their children's education or DONATE and watch your kids prosper from the experience of YOUR INVESTMENT?
By the way, I just saw this news article about Oak Ridge HS Booster club raffling a Mercedez Benz. You can enter by "Donating" $100 to the Booster club so they can fix their baseball fields. Ironic isn't it?
http://www.sacbee.co...-13701634c.html
"The only thing we can take with us from this life is the good that we have done to others."
"Our strength will be found in our charity." [Betty J. Eadie]
"Being a mom is the most rewarding job I have ever had!"
"SEMPER FIDELIS! USMC"