
The Folsom City Library
#136
Posted 09 March 2004 - 02:09 PM
#137
Posted 09 March 2004 - 03:44 PM
By the way, if the ball field next to you is seldom used why not put the library there?
I think we should re-establish the rules for playing nicely.
#138
Posted 09 March 2004 - 04:07 PM
I really think it's more about old timers feeling like their city isn't theirs anymore. It is more about resisting change, and not being heard, than it is about desecration of a memorial.
I think the site is a good one, and the library can be built without taking over the park, and will be a nice addition to the area, helping to create more of a civic center for our town.
Steve Heard
Folsom Real Estate Specialist
EXP Realty
BRE#01368503
Owner - MyFolsom.com
916 718 9577
#139
Posted 09 March 2004 - 09:25 PM
The rules are simple... no personal attacks, hate messages, or racial blasts. You may disagree with me (which is perfectly fine), but if that's the case, that's what this forum is for, it's to discuss these things.
When I said I was taking off my "webmaster hat", it meant I was standing up and being vocal about something. I typically try and let others do the debating for the most part. I don't want the fact that you disagree with me to make you not want to continue to visit this site. I disagree with lots of people... it doesn't mean that I don't like them or think they are bad people, we just have different perspectives on things.
#140
Posted 09 March 2004 - 10:35 PM
Have you ever heard of Patrotisim (sp)
That is about serving your country -
If u all are computer literate - then take your search engines and put in "California Military and Veterans Code"
it is part of the legislative code for the State of California
just like the Family Code, the Criminal Code, Probate Code
and when u are done researching the California Code which are legislatures often work late into the night on
have your search engine take a look at the Federal Code
and after doing this small bit of research - research u can also obtain at your library or you might want to try the law library in Auburn on Lincoln Way across from the court house - u know the court house in Auburn, the historic building
then u come back and tell me that removing a Veteran's Memorial is ok
that u can find a classification that legally permits the removal and replacement of this memorial
u do remember the Twin Towers in New York don't u

#141
Posted 09 March 2004 - 10:39 PM
Military and Veterans Code Section 1318
1318. Every person who ................, tears down, or removes any veterans' memorial constructed or established by any veterans' association, as defined in subdivision © of Section 1260, is guilty of a crime punishable by imprisonment in the state prison or by imprisonment in the county jail for less than one year.







#142
Posted 09 March 2004 - 10:46 PM
Ben Stein
#143
Posted 09 March 2004 - 11:22 PM
I have read so much that I am forgetting who said what to who, consequently, I am addressing my remarks to everyone. To the person who believes me to be a part of the "old codgers", I pray that God willing you will some day be in my same age bracket and I trust that if you have done a reasonable job at parenting the youth will have more respect for their elders than to call them names.
stevethedad. I remember you from the fact that you work for the mayor and since I have visited most of the sites on this web, you remind me a lot of candy apple alias "Tokyo Rose". You have had as much to say about the gay marriage rights as you have the library. I wonder if you are one of the married ones that Harley is referring to as some of the married folks he has met. It is clear that all of you are beginning to understand that this issue is not over a ball field or a rock monument....it is over the destruction of a substantial part of our original and currently "city park". As I have stated before, the Lion members and veterans would be equally obstinate even if you wanted to put a church on this site. I trust that does not make us anti-Christ.
One of you asked about common ground or something we could all agree upon. I believe there is something we could all agree upon and stop the recall efforts and the devisive tactics within this community. Specifically, the pro recall team believes that we represent the majority opinion of this community. The majority of the city council believes that they represent the majority of this community relevant to the placement of the library. Clearly one of us "is wrong." Consequently, I believe there is a common ground to prove who or which of us is right or wrong. The city council can put this issue to a vote on the November ballot with a stroke of their pen. If the vote is in favor of a library on this site, I would work toward calling off the Lions and the veterans---the two organizations believe in the democratic process and if the majority would rather exchange a portion of their park for a library then that is what we (Lions and vets) have defended for low this many years. If any of you have influence with one or more members of the city council and they have interest in this offer, you know how to email me.
In the mean time, let us play nicely and John, I still am interested in your explanation for friggin

#144
Posted 10 March 2004 - 12:08 AM
I thought you were being sarcastic...

"friggin" is a synonym for 4-letter word that starts with "f". I'll let you fill inthe blanks...
#145
Posted 10 March 2004 - 01:15 AM
I am not sure that I was trying to be anything. I did, and do, know the term. However, as a 20 year serviceman, I believe in and live by the "rules of engagement" and when I first visited this site (6 days go) I first read the rules. I was surprised that the first offender of the rules was (in my short history) the "maker of the rules". It is kind of like GOD being the first to break a commandment!!!
It is OK, given my age this is not my first disappointment. Probable not my last. However, I do promise to be nice and play by the rules as I understand them.

#146
Posted 10 March 2004 - 08:07 AM
Yes, I've got opinions. As a moderator, I am encouraged to share them, ijn order to keep the boards busy. As an American, I have the right to voice them. As a decent human being, I seek the truth, and feel compelled to point out the inequities and wrongs I see and hear. This forum provides the opportunity.
I see nothing wrong with the library site, and have been told by countless in the know that many sites were considered, public input was encouraged and accepted, and the decision of the site was made after careful consideration, believe that the new library will contain a better memorial than the existing one, and agree that the field is little used, you resort to a personal attack?
You think because I believe we should leave gays alone and let them marry each other if they care to do so, and that our lives will not be changed, you suggest that I may be one of the married bi-sexuals Farley was referring to?
Girlfriend, with the hissy you are throwing over the library site, I'm getting suspicious of you, too. Just what do you DO in that park? SNAP! Backatcha!
Seriously, for me, the 'if you're defending them you must be one of 'em' tactic doesn't work. This ain't the McCarthy era.
Stick to the issue at hand.
I think the recall is wrong, divisive, and expensive.
Steve Heard
Folsom Real Estate Specialist
EXP Realty
BRE#01368503
Owner - MyFolsom.com
916 718 9577
#147
Posted 10 March 2004 - 08:30 AM
#148
Posted 10 March 2004 - 08:33 AM

Nobody's perfect.
#149
Posted 12 March 2004 - 07:46 AM

It is so wonderful that our wonderful cc keeps behaving in such a consistent manner
that is - upsetting one and all

now let me see how many fire personel and their respective spouses and significant others will be signing the recall petition
I understand Starsky really put his foot in it
Anyone who desires to run for cc should start soliciting support
and to begin with they can contact members of the Joint Veterans or members of the Lions Club
so much for "malcontents"
#150
Posted 12 March 2004 - 08:25 AM
But before you go recruiting your mercenaries, here's food for thought... one of the key issues raised by our firefighters is that its too expensive for them to live in this community! so how many are you going to to get to sign this recall petition of yours? are you training your volunteers to misrepresent the nature of the recall effort?
With all due respect to you and your service to the country, please try to stick to the issue at hand.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users