QUOTE (Soonerborn @ Jun 8 2010, 04:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The sad part is, even with them hurting and giving up as much as they did, they are still light years ahead of FCUSD when it comes to working conditions. Even if they give more up, the student and working conditions are STILL drastically better. FCUSD seems to bank on Elk Grove in bad times, but don't want to acknowledge them in good times. This is the double speak that has been mentioned in this topic several times. When was the last time K had 24 students or 4-6 had 28 students in FCUSD...and this is after they have reached their TA! My point is that just listing districts throughout the state, to show why FCUSD needs more furlough days, without providing specific information is misleading and unfair. Put comparisons down for the public and teachers to see, so that a detailed agruement one way or the other can be made. Don't we instruct our students to gather the facts before writing a persuasive essay?
I was told, back in September, that our district is underfunded compared to surrounding districts. The reason for this is that the Federal Government used to subsidize our revenue limit by around $2000 per student while Mather Air Force Base was active. Once that base was closed, we lost that funding and the state of California never made up the difference. JoAnne and Teresa, please correct this if I got the amount wrong, but I remember hearding that it was about $2000 per pupil that we lost. How does our revenue limit compare to Elk Grove, San Juan and Sac City? It is very difficult to find a list of school revenue limits in this state.