Jump to content






Trayvon Martin's Death - and other issues


  • Please log in to reply
343 replies to this topic

#166 Folsom Reader

Folsom Reader

    Netizen

  • Registered Members
  • PipPip
  • 28 posts

Posted 23 April 2012 - 02:21 PM

You DO realize that this thread has 157 posts, not including this one?

Why are you so late to attack it and me for posting it?

It is clear to me that you are backing up your good friend Steve Heard. And that is fine, as good friends should back each other up.

Yes, clearly many here disagree with you. Maybe that should give you reason to reflect on the matter more.

Racial hate, no matter by whom, will not go away until we face it head on and try to change it.
Trying to make believe it does not exist in any race is foolish folly.

Blacks often defend the violent actions of their race because of slavery of their ancestors. Many believe all whites hate them and act defensively no matter how nice they are treated and no matter what special programs are set up to help them get ahead.

Whites are an easy cop out for many blacks who just will not try hard for the education or experience they need to have the lives they want.

Now, I have probably made you more aghast, right? Well guess what, I’m just saying what too many are afraid to say.

Maybe if more blacks spoke out against the hate their black leaders use to gain the public lime light, we’d begin to have some racial harmony. But, instead of doing that, they go after the one person who is addressing the issue.

Tell me, how many letters of disagreement have you written to Al Sharpton, Jessie Jackson or Van Jones? Or, for the matter, Mr. Obama, who helped generate more hate in this issue?

I guess they can say what they want, but us whites folks just need to shut up?



MaxineR- Being that I do not write on myfolsom.com very often I will have to cut and paste to respond to some of the comments. I will not respond to everything you are bringing up-

"You DO realize that this thread has 157 posts, not including this one?
Why are you so late to attack it and me for posting it?"

I don't read myfolsom.com everyday so I am speaking out against what you are saying now because I am just reading it now. The posts are disturbing and just as you are writing here, I am responding.

"It is clear to me that you are backing up your good friend Steve Heard. And that is fine, as good friends should back each other up."
Just as I have never met you, I have never met Steve Heard. I would like to back up someone who I believe provided a measured calm response to some of the things that have been written in this thread.

"I guess they can say what they want, but us whites folks just need to shut up?"
Maxine- I am white- and want to speak out as you do not speak for all "us white folks".

I can't even begin to respond to many of the other things in your post. You have stated your beliefs and biases and I am just adding my opinions. We clearly disagree.

#167 The Average Joe

The Average Joe

    Hopeless Addict

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,155 posts

Posted 23 April 2012 - 02:24 PM

Let's all settle down and stop getting personal. Obviously, there are differing views colored by people's life experience.
Free speech is not meant to protect only the ideas we agree with, it is meant to also protect the ideas we abhor. You want some nebulous political hack writing the legislation that determines what is and what isn't "hate speech?" I don't. Of course, the dems want to amend the 1st Amendment to limit political speech so why am I surprised...

Hate speech should be protected as the "marketplace of ideas" will quickly diminish such speech. However, inciting people to bring harm to others should be prosecutable (such as the case I linked earlier that no one has commented on. 2 black teens beat a white teen because they were mad about the Martin case. They chose him because he was white.) I think the good Reverend has some culpability there.

I hate the idea of "hate crimes" getting any special treatment at all. A crime is a crime, and most involve hate. The root of that hate is irrelevant to the victim.

Keep to the topic, and relevant aspects of it and leave the personal attacks aside.

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive" -- C.S. Lewis

 

If the only way to combat "global warming" was to lower taxes, we would never hear of the issue again. - Anonymous

 

"Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one" — Thomas Paine, 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘰𝘯 𝘚𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘦 (1776)

 


#168 (The Dude)

(The Dude)
  • Visitors

Posted 23 April 2012 - 02:26 PM

You ask why 'all the blow up' since Trayvon Martin and Andrew Zimmerman were not famous. I thought it was obvious, but here goes: It became national news because it is surrounded by controversy.




It got all blown up because Obama stepped in and opened his mouth about it and then a few racist celebrities threw in their hatred and went national with call outs to "get" Zimmerman. That right there is what got people riled up and poured salt into the wounds of racial divide.

If those fools had all kept their mouths shut and used common sense and waited for the law to handle this case, instead of passing judgement as the judge, jury and executioner - then there would not be the racial uproar that there is about this mess.

They fueled the fire, they seem to like doing that.

#169 Robert Giacometti

Robert Giacometti

    There are no Dumb questions

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,850 posts

Posted 23 April 2012 - 02:26 PM

Diversity and free speech does not include racism - that is a line in the sand that should not be crossed...

By the way _ I changed the title to one more appropriate ...


Like it or NOT freedom of speech, in this country ( Since the forum is private the owner sets the rules) does allow others to say things you & I absolutely oppose, including racism.

Then there is the million dollar question of what exactly is the defintion of racism anyway? Who gets to decide where that line in the sand is drawn? who gets to decide to what levels of diversity are allowed in Folsom?

We are all so fortunate we live in a country where we have rights and everyone else gets to enjoy those same rights! If we start to limit others rights where do we draw the line on that?

#170 old soldier

old soldier

    Living Legend

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,715 posts

Posted 23 April 2012 - 02:48 PM

ok we have the nut whites (arayan brotherhood) and the nut blacks (panthers, sharpton etc) but silent in this fracus is the hispanic folks defending zimmerman. If he pulled the hispanic racial card this would not be a white/black issue at all it would be a brown/black problem....but it may be there is not a nut fringe in the hispanic community

#171 Steve Heard

Steve Heard

    Owner

  • Admin
  • 13,752 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 April 2012 - 03:12 PM

when you did down you have to ask why obama calls himself black when he is half white. I guess the answer might be to ask old zimmerman what his choice is in this matter.

the only winners I see so far are the gun stores, cause folks are upping their ammunition supplies, until we see how this is going to come out


Old Soldier, when I first heard the reports, the media claimed that it was a white man who killed a black kid. Later on, when his father spoke, I learned that his mother was hispanic. So, I believe the media was first to make the claim.

The debate over racial identity among bi-racial or multi-racial individuals has been going on for centuries, from Europe to Africa and Asia. In the US, many states had the 'one drop' rule (in some states, the 1/64th rule), which meant that if a person had any African ancestry at all, they must be legally classified as black. No choice. One drop equals black. The question is, when one is half one race and half another, where do they identify. Many people of multi-racial background can attest to being considered too black for some and not black enough for others. It comes with the territory. My daughters are of African, Italian, Mexican, French, Native American and Scotch-Irish descent, and probably even more.

I knew a guy who was half-Japanese and half-Korean. He was ostracized and discriminated against by both side.

I'd guess that Mr. Zimmerman caught his share of grief from both hispanics and whites for his mixed heritage.

Sadly, it comes with the territory.

As for the President, can you imagine Obama calling himself 'white'? What a stir that would cause from whites and blacks alike. Instead, Obama has repeatedly spoken of being proud of his mixed-race heritage, both the white and black.

Dear Mr. Heard, I’m sure we’d all like to believe we live in a safe community, here in Folsom.
But it hasn’t been so long ago that a black man from out of town, brutally raped and killed a elderly white woman by the name of Alice Murphy. Can you tell me why he didn’t attack a black woman instead? Of course you can’t. But, many here may think it was because she was white that he chose her. To me that is a hate crime, but we all know hate crimes only happen to those who are not white, don’t we?

Numbers and the rate of incidents against one race or another can be searched and brought forth for the sake of argument. Would you like to go there? White woman are killed and raped more by minorities, than any other race in this nation, just for your information. Why do you suppose that is? Shall we compare the cases in the last year?

I’m sure for the sake of business, it would be nice to play this down and make people belive that here in Folsom, we need not worry about our safety. Alice certainly didn’t worry and probably believed what someone told her about our, oh so safe community.

Had she been more informed, I’m sure she would have left some food outside for her cat and double locked her door, the night she was viciously attacked.

I think there is entirely too much racial hate in all races and was ashamed I placed that racist web site up. I tried to do the right thing by asking it be taken down and admitting my mistake, but obviously, you would have liked for me to not post anything about the Trayvon/Zimmerman incident at all.

And, obviously, you now want to rub my nose in it, because your dislike for me on this board is well known.



Maxine, look at the stats. Folsom has one of the lowest crime rates in Northern California, so yes, it is a relatively safe community. That's one of the reasons so many people want to live here

As for the predator that murdered the elderly woman in her home, I'm guessing that he chose his victim because she was vulnerable. As you and I have both stated, more blacks are killed by other blacks than by whites, and that includes the killing of old ladies. Even if he had chosen her because of race, and there's been no evidence I've read that such was the case, it does not mean that it's open season on white folks.

As for hate crimes, you are incorrect. Race is a protected class, and all races are included. It's not just white against a minority. Whites can be victims of hate crimes as well.

I don't know what websites you're choosing to support your beliefs, but according to the FBI, which was charged with keeping statistics on hate crimes 1990, during the Bush Administration, when race was identified as the bias in hate crimes, 69.8 percent were motivated by anti-black bias and 18.2 percent stemmed from anti-white bias.

What stats were you referring to?

Again, as I said earlier, it really is pointless to run the numbers in an effort to justify our biases. It isn't a contest and I don't think that having an equal number of black and white victims will make anyone happy.

I responded to your first remarks then stepped away as you dug deeper, making more and more outlandish and offensive statements.

It has little to do with whether I like you or not. It is about the truth, and what you are claiming just isn't true.

'The Dude' and Robert Giacometti are examples of people with whom I've had differences of opinion to the point of heated discussions, and we've called each other out on several occasions and vice-versa. It's not because I don't like them (in fact, I've had beers watched ball games with both of them on a number of occasions). It's because I believed they were wrong and I said so.

So, though you and I are unlikely to ever have a beer summit, I disagree with you based on the facts.

Steve Heard

Folsom Real Estate Specialist

EXP Realty

BRE#01368503

Owner - MyFolsom.com

916 718 9577 


#172 supermom

supermom

    Supermom

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,225 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 23 April 2012 - 03:29 PM

'The Dude' and Robert Giacometti are examples of people with whom I've had differences of opinion to the point of heated discussions, and we've called each other out on several occasions and vice-versa. It's not because I don't like them (in fact, I've had beers watched ball games with both of them on a number of occasions). It's because I believed they were wrong and I said so.


Hey!!!!

So why haven't we ever had a beer summitt?

Is it because I'm Super?Posted ImagePosted Image

#173 tsukiji

tsukiji

    Hall Of Famer

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,790 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Freedom. Family. Food. Funds.

Posted 23 April 2012 - 03:32 PM

Ran out of popcorn so I need to stop reading this thread. When it's over, can someone send me an email to tell me who the winner is? email address: rhetorical@question.com

#174 tsukiji

tsukiji

    Hall Of Famer

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,790 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Freedom. Family. Food. Funds.

Posted 23 April 2012 - 03:37 PM

Let's all settle down and stop getting personal. Obviously, there are differing views colored by people's life experience.


Oh come on, nobody caught this? Okay, I gotta ask -- pun intended? Or just lucky? :)

#175 Steve Heard

Steve Heard

    Owner

  • Admin
  • 13,752 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 April 2012 - 03:45 PM

It got all blown up because Obama stepped in and opened his mouth about it and then a few racist celebrities threw in their hatred and went national with call outs to "get" Zimmerman. That right there is what got people riled up and poured salt into the wounds of racial divide.

If those fools had all kept their mouths shut and used common sense and waited for the law to handle this case, instead of passing judgement as the judge, jury and executioner - then there would not be the racial uproar that there is about this mess.

They fueled the fire, they seem to like doing that.

While I agree with you on the subject of buffoons such as Sharpton and Spike Lee, I don't see what the President did that was so wrong.

Here's what he said, "I can only imagine what these parents are going through,” adding that he couldn’t help but think about his daughters. “I think every parent in America should be able to understand why it is absolutely imperative that we investigate every aspect of this."

“My main message is to the parents of Trayvon Martin,” he added. “If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon. I think they are right to expect that all of us as Americans are going to take this with the seriousness it deserves and we’re going to get to the bottom of exactly what happened.”

The president said he was pleased to hear that Florida Gov. Rick Scott has appointed a task force to look into the incident.

“I think all of us have to do some soul searching to figure out how does something like this happen,”

Noting that his attorney general is looking into the case, the president prefaced his remarks by saying it was important he was not “impairing any investigation that’s taking place right now.”


So, what's wrong with what he said? He didn't accuse or blame anyone. He simply acknoledge the tragedy and the importance of the matter being investigated.

Hey!!!!

So why haven't we ever had a beer summitt?

Is it because I'm Super?Posted ImagePosted Image


I thought you were a non-drinker! Let's meet up for a beer summit soon. I don't drink beer very often any more, but I can have wine or something. Why don't we do a myfolsom.com beer summit in the next couple of weeks?

Steve Heard

Folsom Real Estate Specialist

EXP Realty

BRE#01368503

Owner - MyFolsom.com

916 718 9577 


#176 tsukiji

tsukiji

    Hall Of Famer

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,790 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Freedom. Family. Food. Funds.

Posted 23 April 2012 - 03:51 PM

“I think all of us have to do some soul searching to figure out how does something like this happen,”

Noting that his attorney general is looking into the case, the president prefaced his remarks by saying it was important he was not “impairing any investigation that’s taking place right now.”


Hi Steve -- I didn't watch the speech. What was the context of "this" above? When Obama said "...something like this..." to what is 'this' referring? And what is the objective of Rick Scott's task force? To determine if the shooting was justified? Or something more? If former, why is a task force necessary? Isn't it day-to-day PD business?

#177 supermom

supermom

    Supermom

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,225 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 23 April 2012 - 04:15 PM

Hi Steve -- I didn't watch the speech. What was the context of "this" above? When Obama said "...something like this..." to what is 'this' referring? And what is the objective of Rick Scott's task force? To determine if the shooting was justified? Or something more? If former, why is a task force necessary? Isn't it day-to-day PD business?


You bring up good questions, and I can't even begin to think on how the President's personal interset and federal attorney on a case will or will not influence an investigation....

That said...The federal government has special interest in investigating hate crimes, and have in fact documented their own investigation and added charges on/ or had a person do federal time after the local time was completed/ because of particularly interesting situations involving hate. This form of 'legal' double jeopardy--falls under the Hate Crime Prevention Act of 2009.

There are several cases currently going through the courts, now-that fall under this new law.

#178 tsukiji

tsukiji

    Hall Of Famer

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,790 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Freedom. Family. Food. Funds.

Posted 23 April 2012 - 04:21 PM

You bring up good questions, and I can't even begin to think on how the President's personal interset and federal attorney on a case will or will not influence an investigation....

That said...The federal government has special interest in investigating hate crimes, and have in fact documented their own investigation and added charges on/ or had a person do federal time after the local time was completed/ because of particularly interesting situations involving hate. This form of 'legal' double jeopardy--falls under the Hate Crime Prevention Act of 2009.

There are several cases currently going through the courts, now-that fall under this new law.


So then is Obama operating under a presumption that hate was a motivation here?

#179 The Average Joe

The Average Joe

    Hopeless Addict

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,155 posts

Posted 23 April 2012 - 04:46 PM

I notice O and Holder didn't say anything about the Black Panthers putting the bounty up. Nor did he mention a call for calm when the black teens in Ill. beat the white teen because of Zimmerman. He also never mentioned a thing when the gang punk killed the 2 British tourists who happened to be in the wrong place (the brit families expressed dismay that their children didn't rate an acknowledgement).

He should have stayed out of it as it is a local issue repeated hundreds of times every day. By entering into the discussion, he applies political pressure to the judicial and investigative process. It seems to me the only thing he should have said is for everyone to remain calm, and let the investigation run its course.

Just like when he said "The police acted foolishly." I'd say he acted foolishly. And certainly not very Presidential.

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive" -- C.S. Lewis

 

If the only way to combat "global warming" was to lower taxes, we would never hear of the issue again. - Anonymous

 

"Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one" — Thomas Paine, 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘰𝘯 𝘚𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘦 (1776)

 


#180 Steve Heard

Steve Heard

    Owner

  • Admin
  • 13,752 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 April 2012 - 04:47 PM

Hi Steve -- I didn't watch the speech. What was the context of "this" above? When Obama said "...something like this..." to what is 'this' referring? And what is the objective of Rick Scott's task force? To determine if the shooting was justified? Or something more? If former, why is a task force necessary? Isn't it day-to-day PD business?

I can't speak for the President, but what I took the 'this' to mean was the story that made national news: On February 26, a 17 year old kid was visiting his father and planning to watch a basketball game. He walked to the store and upon his return, was spotted by a neighborhood watch captain who called 911, and against the advice of the police dispatcher, followed him. A confrontation and struggle ensued, with the kid ending up dead. The killer turns out to be the son of a retired judge, and no charges were filed against him.

Whether or not the story was accurate, that was the story we heard. That's what I believe he was commenting on.

I think the task force came into play because of the opinion from the family and many others that the police were quick to accept Zimmerman's story of self-defense because of who he was and because the kid was black. With Zimmerman having previous run-ins with the law and the fact that he was the son of a retired judge, they seemed to have little faith in the system and sought help from the media and anyone else who would listen.

Steve Heard

Folsom Real Estate Specialist

EXP Realty

BRE#01368503

Owner - MyFolsom.com

916 718 9577 





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users