206 replies to this topic

[EDF]

All hype. No substance. There is no hope with you. Hate hate hate. Blame blame blame. Dems are the root of all evil. Your arguments are way too biased to even be considered. Dang it.

Yes... socialist/commies formerly known as Democrats are the root of all evil... can't have god in the platform... are for allowing "illegal" aliens to vote... they promote "sanctuary cities" and don't enforce illegal immigration laws... should I go on kiddo...?

Get back to me...


Mod Edit: deleted comments concerning abortion. caligirlz

[Judge Smails]

FYI smarty pants, Obama could have served after high school. I am glad you realize women can serve now, points for that

I missed the part where you mentioned your military service.

[Chris]

All hype. No substance. There is no hope with you. Hate hate hate. Blame blame blame. Dems are the root of all evil. Your arguments are way too biased to even be considered. Dang it.

Sorry, this response follows your usual pattern of name calling (all while claiming others do it) followed up with claims of hate and/or racism, then you threaten to quit, that your done, or not going respond anymore. I won't play that game with you over and over again here. The take home message in this thread is that both left and right are guilty of voter fraud but that the scale of the democratic party and union organized voter fraud is magnitudes above anything the reps have ever done. Sorry that does not agree with you but you're gonna have to live with that fact until you can prove otherwise. Chris

[cw68]

Sorry, this response follows your usual pattern of name calling (all while claiming others do it) followed up with claims of hate and/or racism, then you threaten to quit, that your done, or not going respond anymore. I won't play that game with you over and over again here. The take home message in this thread is that both left and right are guilty of voter fraud but that the scale of the democratic party and union organized voter fraud is magnitudes above anything the reps have ever done. Sorry that does not agree with you but you're gonna have to live with that fact until you can prove otherwise. Chris

And that voter ID does nothing to quell the problem.

We have to agree to disagree that the of fraud perpetrated and designed by Democrats is any worse than the systematic fraud from republicans.

[Carl G]

Just amazing!

Although your arguments are clearly failing, you keep making them.

What I find amazing is that after 12 pages absolutely no one has changed their mind, regardless of the facts. What we really have here is a bunch of hot air (including myself... well, mine is lukewarm).

[MurphysLaw]

Here is one thing I thought I would never see, conservatives suppressing the conservative vote.

http://www.lp.org/bl...target-virginia

"Republicans desperate to knock Libertarians off ballot; latest target: Virginia"

[Carl G]

Go ahead, continue to stick you head in the sand

The Detroit News: Secretary of State: 4K noncitizens on voter rolls

[cw68]

Go ahead, continue to stick you head in the sand

The Detroit News: Secretary of State: 4K noncitizens on voter rolls

This is unsubstantiated, btw. This was an extrapolated number from census rolls and is not verified in any way.

It very well may be just like Colorado. The Colorado secretary of state last year estimated that 11,805 noncitizens were on the rolls.

His office sent letters to 3,903 registered voters questioning their status. Now the number of noncitizens stands at 141, based on checks using a federal immigration database. Of those 141, Gessler said 35 have voted in the past. The 141 are .004 percent of the state's nearly 3.5 million voters.

The Denver clerk and recorder's office, which had records on eight of the 35 voters who cast ballots in the past, did its own verification and found that those eight people appear to be citizens, such as a 20-year-old adopted from Mexico was listed as having illegally voted.

The sky is NOT falling.

[Robert Giacometti]

This is unsubstantiated, btw. This was an extrapolated number from census rolls and is not verified in any way.

It very well may be just like Colorado. The Colorado secretary of state last year estimated that 11,805 noncitizens were on the rolls.

His office sent letters to 3,903 registered voters questioning their status. Now the number of noncitizens stands at 141, based on checks using a federal immigration database. Of those 141, Gessler said 35 have voted in the past. The 141 are .004 percent of the state's nearly 3.5 million voters.

The Denver clerk and recorder's office, which had records on eight of the 35 voters who cast ballots in the past, did its own verification and found that those eight people appear to be citizens, such as a 20-year-old adopted from Mexico was listed as having illegally voted.

The sky is NOT falling.

Who posted the sky is falling?

How does the Colorado Secretary of State know that everyone who voted, was really the person they claimed to be without a valid picture ID?

Regardless of of philosophical views on issues, I would hope we all would want the best system possible for making sure that all those elected are done so in the fairest way possible!

I'm getting the impression that some really don't want that?

[cw68]

Who posted the sky is falling?

How does the Colorado Secretary of State know that everyone who voted, was really the person they claimed to be without a valid picture ID?

Regardless of of philosophical views on issues, I would hope we all would want the best system possible for making sure that all those elected are done so in the fairest way possible!

I'm getting the impression that some really don't want that?

Right, that's exactly it. I don't want it done in the fairest way possible. That is just so ridiculous. Because you don't agree with me you accuse me of something. Not cool.

[Robert Giacometti]

Right, that's exactly it. I don't want it done in the fairest way possible. That is just so ridiculous. Because you don't agree with me you accuse me of something. Not cool.

At least your are consistent, in that you jump to conclusions about what I was saying instead of asking for clarifications!

Can you show me WHERE I said CW68 in my post?

How about showing all of us some of that collaboration you keep talking about....at least once?