QUOTE(valdossjoyce @ Jul 17 2008, 10:30 PM)

The point people seem to be is missing in this dispute is that those who want a tribute to Cash for "putting us on the map" are at complete odds with those who want to promote Folsom as the upscale Sacramento suburb, haven to Intel intelligentsia and other yuppies, that want the world to FORGET WE HAVE A PRISON here! These two "visions" of Folsom clash in a very big way. While I get a kick out of our notoriety compliments of Cash's song, that song hardly gives justice to the man who, after kicking his drug addiction, became a solid Christian and humanitarian seeking to make this world a better place. His music resonates because it strikes at the core of human experience and emotion. His life works, beyond the song, is commendable. I think I could get over the fact that the bridge was not named for him if another appropriate name had been selected. A name that is completely geographically incorrect just makes us look stupid.
You bring up a good point. But just like Folsom is part of the Sacramento MSA, the portion of land and water the bridge crosses, per the State of California, is mapped and part of the Folsom Lake SRA. This new bridge will cross the Folsom Lake SRA. This is a fact; see www.parks.ca.gov or www.ca.gov for yourself. So when someone knows the facts, the name is not stupid. Grant you the name is not perfect, but it is factual and geographically correct. To be positively perfect, though, instead of by-pass, maybe adjust the name to Folsom Lake SRA Crossing.
Also, Folsom has Lake Natoma Crossing. Per all of my sources thus far, Lake Natoma goes from the bend to Nimbus Dam, thus since the bridge is up-river from the bend, this bridge is incorrectly named. I'm very open to anyone that can prove this wrong with facts. What was Kerry's and the council's vote on that bridges name in 2000?
Why did Kerry, who was on the 2-person council with Starsky to choose the 4 best names, allow this winning entry to be part of the vote?