Didn't I say the same thing back in Post# 157 of this topic.

Folsom Lake Crossing
#211
Posted 25 June 2008 - 10:06 AM
Didn't I say the same thing back in Post# 157 of this topic.

#212
Posted 25 June 2008 - 10:07 AM
If the council wasn't willing to discuss any other name at all that didn't have the word "Folsom" in it, what a slap in the face to the people that took their time out to propose names or go to a council meeting and speak before the council.
I know you and Kerri have some sort of troubled history, Robert, but the truth of the matter is Kerri is the only councilmember that is responsive to emails. Eric King runs a close second in my experience. If her agenda is listening to residents and finding answers for them, I don't think that is such a bad thing. I really wish you two could patch things up.
well said!
Travel, food and drink blog by Dave - http://davestravels.tv
#213
Posted 25 June 2008 - 10:07 AM
see, I told ya you should've gone to the meeting....

Travel, food and drink blog by Dave - http://davestravels.tv
#214
Posted 25 June 2008 - 10:11 AM
so why did those guys pick that lame name for the bridge in obvious opposition to what the majority of Folsom would have preferred to name it? Just doesn't make sense..
but whatever... its just a name, it's not all that important in the grand scheme of things - it just could have been a great opportunity to promote the city....ah well
the best part is we got a new bridge in/out of town to help traffic flow better and that is great
---
It was the majority on myfolsom.com It does not mean that the majority of the voting people in Folsom would have voted for it. It would depend on how much advertising came out on it by the chamber of commerce and others.
It sure should not be called "crossing" as lake crossing as it does not cross the lake. Maybe bridge... Folsom Lake Bridge... City council, make a correction to your error....
NOTE: CITY COUNCIL ????? Come on I know that you all read this and not just Kerri...
Andy, you want to speak up???? You do sometimes....
#215
Posted 25 June 2008 - 10:11 AM
you're over thinking the situation dude, it never got that far....
and you guys don't know that Kerri personally contacted the family.... until she says she did that all on her own I call BS on this... you and Robert are putting words in her mouth - keep in mind, she posted that note at 1:30 in the morning after a long day...
and honestly, don't you think it would be better for a city council member to contact the Cash family then an administrative assistant?
Travel, food and drink blog by Dave - http://davestravels.tv
#216
Posted 25 June 2008 - 10:12 AM
Good grief. You caught me. You're right. Most of the time the city council doesn't make sense. (Sorry, Kerri).
I'm just glad the family was contacted since the Johnny Cash name was in the running even if it was only truly in consideration by a lone council member. If that name were picked, I would expect city staff to be involved in the drawing up of contracts and such. If Kerri wants to make her own personal apology to the family, I don't see a problem with that.
#217
Posted 25 June 2008 - 10:12 AM
It was the majority on myfolsom.com It does not mean that the majority of the voting people in Folsom would have voted for it. It would depend on how much advertising came out on it by the chamber of commerce and others.
It sure should not be called "crossing" as lake crossing as it does not cross the lake. Maybe bridge... Folsom Lake Bridge... City council, make a correction to your error....
NOTE: CITY COUNCIL ????? Come on I know that you all read this and not just Kerri...
Andy, you want to speak up???? You do sometimes....
He is anonymous today.

#218
Posted 25 June 2008 - 10:13 AM

I had more fun at my car club meeting. Enjoyed the "Bang Bang Chicken & Shrimp" from The Cheesecake Factory at Arden Fair Mall.
And as you pointed out, like I knew would be the case, the results of the council meeting had absolutely nothing to do with what the attendees desired, and was all about the me,me,me of the "only my opinion counts Steve Miklos" driven council.

#219
Posted 25 June 2008 - 10:14 AM
It was the majority on myfolsom.com It does not mean that the majority of the voting people in Folsom would have voted for it. It would depend on how much advertising came out on it by the chamber of commerce and others.
It sure should not be called "crossing" as lake crossing as it does not cross the lake. Maybe bridge... Folsom Lake Bridge... City council, make a correction to your error....
NOTE: CITY COUNCIL ????? Come on I know that you all read this and not just Kerri...
Andy, you want to speak up???? You do sometimes....
you don't know that for sure, but it seems like a lot more people were interested in the JC name then anything else.... and not just here on myfolsom...
Yes, Folsom Lake BRIDGE would indeed make a lot more sense - at least its the bridge near Folsom lake....not a crossing d'oh (it just sounds so stupid)
Other city council members are on here? I would have never known.....
Travel, food and drink blog by Dave - http://davestravels.tv
#220
Posted 25 June 2008 - 10:15 AM
Imagine a city council member approached the Cash family, they agreed. Then an election comes up, that council member is gone. Nobody on city staff knows who to contact, knows anything of the approval. In the meantime, the city voted to go ahead with the name with no documentation.
It's one thing to casually 'run it by' them, another entirely to say they authorized it, planned to attend the unveiling, and we should now apologize for failing to meet our side of the deal.
I applaud Kerri for pushing for what many people wanted. I would personally be fine with JC Bridge, especially over X Crossing that does not cross X. But to say we, the city, need to apologize for her casual conversations (because it didn't go that far, right?) is odd.
#221
Posted 25 June 2008 - 10:16 AM
Yes, Folsom Lake BRIDGE would indeed make a lot more sense - at least its the bridge near Folsom lake....not a crossing d'oh (it just sounds so stupid)
Other city council members are on here? I would have never known.....
They don't post on here, but ya just know they've gotta be reading or hearing from other people who do.
#222
Posted 25 June 2008 - 10:17 AM
#224
Posted 25 June 2008 - 10:21 AM
It's one thing to casually 'run it by' them, another entirely to say they authorized it, planned to attend the unveiling, and we should now apologize for failing to meet our side of the deal.
I applaud Kerri for pushing for what many people wanted. I would personally be fine with JC Bridge, especially over X Crossing that does not cross X. But to say we, the city, need to apologize for her casual conversations (because it didn't go that far, right?) is odd.
again, over thinking the situation dude - she did not tell them that this name was agreed upon when they were contacted
you guys are too stuck on that apology thing..... I'm sure the family is disappointed Johnny's name won't be immortalized in this bridge - so having the common courtesy to let them know it didn't happen makes complete sense - you guys think that's a bad thing, I disagree
Travel, food and drink blog by Dave - http://davestravels.tv
#225
Posted 25 June 2008 - 10:22 AM
I'm being bad here but.... that's assuming they give a hoot about what Folsomites think
Travel, food and drink blog by Dave - http://davestravels.tv
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users