QUOTE(Nancy @ Jul 20 2008, 10:53 PM)

You've GOT to be kidding. Who "showers" anyone with compliments about a bridge name? The only thing a bridge name will get you is a showering of complaints when it's stupid.
Is he sure that it's compliments he was showered with and not complaints? I'm detecting a lingering language barrier in his email ("Except for a handful of few").
It sounds like the poor man might just be confused.
Ah well. Maybe we should just switch gears and make Folsom the home of the Stupid Public Road, Bridge and Tunnel Names Association. We can't be the only ones. Heck, we're going to be overqualified. Not only are we going to have Folsom Lake Crossing, we've got two Oak Avenue Parkways that have no realistic hope of ever connecting.
That is, unless we build yet another bridge (God help us...).
You forgot to input that Lake Natoma Crossing does not cross the official boundary of Lake Natoma (see maps by BLM, USGS, Thomas, and WRT). We may consider that part of the waterway as Lake Natoma, but it is not.
My research wasn't initially for Lake Natoma, but to prove the new bridge does not cross Folsom Lake's boundaries. Unfortunately, Folsom Lake Crossing does cross the Folsom Lake Boundaries. Seems Folsom Lake has "spillage pools" on that side of the dam which is still considered part of Folsom Lake. Even though the pools look like dry granite, it is part of the Folsom Lake engineering (remember Folsom Lake is man-made with man-made boundaries). Plus it will be the only way for motorists to cross Folsom Lake. My research proved one bridge name incorrect, and one bridge correct. Not the outcome I was looking to prove. Or the outcome this forum wishes to hear.
I still side with Johnny Cash something, started a petition, but have found more favor for the city council's decision (or don't want to voice an opinion) than support for Johnny Cash. Is this a losing battle? Maybe. Without an official memorial to Cash, in two years people will be calling this the Dam Bridge anyway.