We don't know that! All we know is that is what the report claims!
I seem to recall a report saying it was OJ's DNA on a pair of certain gloves as well.
It will be interesting to hear what what the definition is of "intermediate" and "close". It will be interesting to find out when this autopsy was done.
I agree.
We have to be careful when talking about evaluating substantial evidential premises.
It will most defintely be interesting to see how his body location and angle of shot are justified since earlier reports state zimmerman say he was on the ground on his back pinned when he shot the kid at point blank. Stating now that the intermediate distance points an entirely different credibility into someone's accounting of a story. I believe that most police consider 3 feet or less as point blank with a hand gun. intermediate is 3 feet to 9 feet. (approx). It would make since that sitting on a person and the arm length of the two people fitting for dominance-there could be somewhere between 24-48 inches. Perhaps a little more if both people have particularly large body mass and long limbs.
And I defintely agree that one must consider the source of the DNA left on the gloves that were purportedly used to kill OJ's girlfriend, given that there was some inconsitencies in tainted evidence with epithelial sources from other items; and that at the time DNA testing and collection, these processes were relatively new and in unchartered waters (from a legal standpoint).
And ofcoarse, autopsy reports can only be as objective and informed as the forensic collections that were professionally picked up by trained collectors. Advances, ofcoarse, in forensic technology are constantly ,improving, but there is always room for mistakes, inconcistencies and corruption of usable evidence.