Jump to content






Photo
- - - - -

$40 Million Ponzi Scheme Headquartered Here In Folsom


  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

#16 Robert Gary

Robert Gary

    Superstar

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 981 posts

Posted 12 March 2009 - 11:53 AM

QUOTE (MSgt @ Mar 12 2009, 11:34 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
He said he was sorry sad.gif


Kill someone and get 5-10 years. Steal their money and get 150 years.

#17 Bill Z

Bill Z

    Hopeless Addict

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,795 posts
  • Location:Briggs Ranch

Posted 12 March 2009 - 12:08 PM

QUOTE (Devdave @ Mar 11 2009, 06:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The story is here:

http://www.news10.ne...p...151&catid=2

A lot more information can be found here: Folsom made the TheRegister.
http://www.theregist...ecurites_fraud/
From the UK link (boldness is my enhancement)
QUOTE
According to the SEC's complaint, Vasallo fooled about about 150 investors — many of whom he met through his church — out of approximately $40m total from May 2004 through November 2008. He allegedly mislead his clients to invest their money in EIMT by claiming he had proprietary trade brokerage software which generated returns of about 3.5 per cent per month with little risk of loss.

Talk about your real slimeball approach to duping investors. An inherent faithful trustworthiness that religious members of the same church will have for each other exploited to make oneself rich at their expense.
I would rather be Backpacking


#18 folsombound

folsombound

    Living Legend

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,040 posts

Posted 12 March 2009 - 12:53 PM

QUOTE (empirerancher @ Mar 12 2009, 08:48 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
it's not a "ponzi" scheme if it is backed by our government...it's an "entitlement" scheme.




It's not an entitlement if you paid into it!

#19 Robert Giacometti

Robert Giacometti

    There are no Dumb questions

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,850 posts

Posted 12 March 2009 - 12:56 PM

QUOTE (folsombound @ Mar 12 2009, 01:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It's not an entitlement if you paid into it!


Unfortunately too many of the payees never paid into it!

#20 Robert Gary

Robert Gary

    Superstar

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 981 posts

Posted 12 March 2009 - 01:33 PM

QUOTE (folsombound @ Mar 12 2009, 01:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It's not an entitlement if you paid into it!


I'm sure all the investors in the recently busted scheme feel the same way. They paid in too.

-Robert


#21 Terry

Terry

    Living Legend

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,425 posts

Posted 12 March 2009 - 02:56 PM

QUOTE (old soldier @ Mar 12 2009, 08:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I saw this on the news, and they sort of made fun of the fact that this outfit operated right across the street from our police department

seems like the folks who invest in these too good to be true deals are either greedy, stupid or both.

our police can't feel too bad about missing this one. I read in the city news bulliton that they got over 470 DUI arrests last year. you take the size of our city and compare with what the CHP does they could take a lesson from our boys and girls.

They ought to put up a sign across the street at riley and sutter with the number of arrests made so the folks that come to all those honkey tonks down there could beware or even take their business elsewhere.. but then again all the money from the dui arrests might just balance the city budget


The police would have nothing to do with this at this point, unless they were also dealing drugs out of that same location or something of that sort. These crimes are federals crimes investigated by the SEC, IRS and FBI. So our local police wouldn't be involved based on the current information available regarding the alleged offenses.


#22 Folsomchick

Folsomchick

    Newbie

  • Registered Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts

Posted 12 March 2009 - 09:11 PM

[quote name='old soldier' date='Mar 12 2009, 08:59 AM' post='314535']
I saw this on the news, and they sort of made fun of the fact that this outfit operated right across the street from our police department

They weren't making fun of the fact that they were operating right across from the Police Dept. They were pointing out the irony. I thought the coverage was compassionate and I applaud the man they interviewed as being brave enough to allow himself to serve as a cautionary tale.


#23 MSgt

MSgt

    Living Legend

  • Moderator
  • 3,405 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natoma Station
  • Interests:Camping
    Reading
    Fishing
    Read and discuss about spiritual matters

Posted 13 March 2009 - 05:20 AM

QUOTE (Robert Gary @ Mar 12 2009, 12:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Kill someone and get 5-10 years. Steal their money and get 150 years.

Maybe if he would have told them where the money is - his sentence would be lighter. No one knows where the money is. He's not talking.

#24 mylo

mylo

    Mmm.. Tomato

  • Moderator
  • 16,763 posts
  • Location:Folsom

Posted 13 March 2009 - 07:50 AM

QUOTE (MSgt @ Mar 13 2009, 06:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Maybe if he would have told them where the money is - his sentence would be lighter. No one knows where the money is. He's not talking.


"Ah, yes, those Gucci extremists and their Prada jihad!" --ducky

#25 MSgt

MSgt

    Living Legend

  • Moderator
  • 3,405 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natoma Station
  • Interests:Camping
    Reading
    Fishing
    Read and discuss about spiritual matters

Posted 13 March 2009 - 08:06 AM

This should have gone to trial. All kinds of corruption would have been open to the public if it had gone to trial and all the evidence displayed for all of us to see.

#26 Robert Giacometti

Robert Giacometti

    There are no Dumb questions

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,850 posts

Posted 13 March 2009 - 11:00 AM

QUOTE (Terry @ Mar 12 2009, 02:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The police would have nothing to do with this at this point, unless they were also dealing drugs out of that same location or something of that sort. These crimes are federals crimes investigated by the SEC, IRS and FBI. So our local police wouldn't be involved based on the current information available regarding the alleged offenses.


I agree with Terry, this isn't the local police's responsibility to investigate these types of crimes. If they got a complaint I'm sure they would have forwarded them to the proper channels

On the other hand, hypothetically, if there were prostitutes operating out of a massage parlor near the police station, having an extraordinary amount of males to women visit this massage parlor daily and being in business for a couple of years, that might be grounds for some comments and questions.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users