Well, finally someone besides me says he can read the signs! Makes me wonder how often people get their vision checked. But then it does explain the way some people drive!

Cost Of New Signs Installed On Our Streets
#16
Posted 15 March 2009 - 06:51 PM
Well, finally someone besides me says he can read the signs! Makes me wonder how often people get their vision checked. But then it does explain the way some people drive!
#17
Posted 15 March 2009 - 07:52 PM
However, last weekend we had some out of town guests come by. On their way to our place they drove through town and said the signs helped out a lot. Now I realize it's a case study of one, but that's the "target market" for the signs. I feel like most of the people complaining are residents. Folsom does not have a "traditional" grid pattern of streets and hose signs are a help for those unfamiliar with the layout. For that, I think they're worthwhile.
#18
Posted 15 March 2009 - 08:06 PM
We need better prioritization. If the current laws dont allow us to spend smart, lets change the laws.
#19
Posted 15 March 2009 - 08:17 PM
When I'm going to be visiting some town I'm not familiar with I go to google or yahoo maps and print it out. I don't depend on signs once I get there.
How many signs does $396,000 buy? I still don't think it's a proper use of redevelopment funds which are meant to eliminate blight. Use those funds to repair sidewalks and streets.
#20
Posted 15 March 2009 - 08:40 PM
#21
Posted 15 March 2009 - 08:52 PM
#22
Posted 15 March 2009 - 09:19 PM
I think the signs are rediculous. $55,000.00 for a bid process??? Are you kidding me? And there is no way those signs cost that amount to make. What a waste of time. Hope you Local 39 guys like the looks of those signs on your furlough fridays, because that's the kind of stuff that caused the furloughs in the first place. Awesome way to spend our money Starsky.......wait a sec....what's your line? "Not on my watch"!!!!!!
#23
Posted 15 March 2009 - 09:21 PM

#24
Posted 15 March 2009 - 09:53 PM

#25
Posted 15 March 2009 - 10:07 PM
BTW, I have absolutely no problem reading any of the signs, I think they do look nice and are helpful. If you can not read them, then you either need glasses or need to slow down. Don't get me started on the IDIOTS and rookie driving I see in Folsom everyday. As for directing people the long way, well they are not meant for people who know where they are going.
#26
Posted 15 March 2009 - 10:43 PM
#27
Posted 16 March 2009 - 06:33 AM
Design: $34,000 paid to Square Peg, Redevelopment funds, account number 173-21-04-046
Bid process: $55,000 cosultant fee paid to SCI Consuting Group, General fund, account number 173-21-06-042
Improvement and installation, phase 1: $292,676 paid to Young Electric, Redevelopment funds, account number 174-21-07-107
Implementation, phase 1: $15,000 paid to Square Peg, Redevelopment funds, account number 173-21-08-013
The total for these signs was $396,676.00. All but $55,000 came out of the Redeveopment funds which cannot be used for employees salaries, benefits, etc, but $55,000 did come out of the General fund which can be used for employees. As the city lays off employees and implements furlough days for their employees (1 day a month, which equates to 5% of their salary per month) don't you think they could spend their money a little more wisely. I am a retired city employee and love this city, but we need to keep track of how the city is spending its money. The above information was obtained through the Public Records Act which anyone can access through the City Clerks office.
Hi Neighbor (I live around the block from you), welcome to the forum.
Great note and excellent detailed info about the cost break down of these signs. The idea was nice, but the execution was bad - the design is very poor and the size of text is unreadable until you are right on top of the sign. It really surprised me that the city went through with putting up these signs that seem to me to be very ineffective and somewhat useless.
I completely agree with you that the city funds could have been much better used on employee salaries.
Who ever approved the sign designs seems to have done it in haste for some unknown reason.
Travel, food and drink blog by Dave - http://davestravels.tv
#28
Posted 16 March 2009 - 06:36 AM
You do know you're not supposed to stop and park in front of the signs to read them (which is about the only way to legibly read them completely)
Were you on the committee that approved these signs?

Travel, food and drink blog by Dave - http://davestravels.tv
#29
Posted 16 March 2009 - 06:55 AM

And here's some more from the department of redundancy department.


#30
Posted 16 March 2009 - 06:59 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users