The rest of the population who are convicted of DUI are able to keep it from their employers, family, friends... Maybe that's the problem, maybe it shouldn't be so easy for everyone else, but to lose your career when no one else does, doesn't sound like being let off the hook easy to me. Not to mention, I don't think everyone else has their name broadcasted all over the news for a DUI. Maybe they all should though... Just a thought

Folsom Cop Arrested
#16
Posted 07 May 2009 - 07:31 PM
The rest of the population who are convicted of DUI are able to keep it from their employers, family, friends... Maybe that's the problem, maybe it shouldn't be so easy for everyone else, but to lose your career when no one else does, doesn't sound like being let off the hook easy to me. Not to mention, I don't think everyone else has their name broadcasted all over the news for a DUI. Maybe they all should though... Just a thought
#17
Posted 07 May 2009 - 07:41 PM
Actually, they do.... if you happen to read the crime logs, you will see them.
#18
Posted 07 May 2009 - 07:45 PM
Actually, they do.... if you happen to read the crime logs, you will see them.
That's true, but how much exposure do the crime logs get vs. the evening news and obviously this website? I'm not sure there's a comparison. Just my opinion though.
#19
Posted 07 May 2009 - 07:53 PM
I thought being arrested was a matter of public record so anyone who gets arrested could conceivably get their name broadcasted everywhere?
I'm guessing anyone who applys to be a police officer or any job for that matter, understands the ramifications of getting caught and convicted of a certain crime. If one doesn't like the ramifications then don't break the laws or apply for a different job that doesn't have those ramifications.
I'm sure everyone is sorry that this incident happened, but society demands that all its citizens are treated equally.
#20
Posted 07 May 2009 - 08:01 PM
That is nice in theory, but I'm not sure if it's really true...that all citizens are treated equally.
#21
Posted 07 May 2009 - 08:04 PM
#22
Posted 07 May 2009 - 08:13 PM
I'm guessing anyone who applys to be a police officer or any job for that matter, understands the ramifications of getting caught and convicted of a certain crime. If one doesn't like the ramifications then don't break the laws or apply for a different job that doesn't have those ramifications.
I'm sure everyone is sorry that this incident happened, but society demands that all its citizens are treated equally.
I don't disagree with anything you've said, I think the law should be applied the same across the board. But just the fact that we are discussing this on this forum doesn't seem like equal treatment. You're right, anyone who gets arrested could "conceivably" get their name broadcasted everywhere, but if that actually happened, there would be a 24 hour news station dedicated to showing pictures/names all day long. And we still wouldn't be discussing all of them.
#23
Posted 07 May 2009 - 08:37 PM
Barb J
#24
Posted 07 May 2009 - 08:59 PM
Sorry... cops must be held to a "higher standard".. they are not just like the rest of us...
#25
Posted 07 May 2009 - 09:01 PM
I agree with you that if the worker at the drive through window gets DUI, we probably wouldn't be discussing this. I suspect that every police officer in Folsom knows that if they get a DUI and involved in a fight, they are going to be talked about in the media.
Knowing this, they can either choose to NOT drink & drive or they can choose to apply for the job at the drive thru window.
I suspect this incident was probably the exception to the officers behavior and that he probably truly regrets it happening. I would hope that no one is happy over someone else's poor choices.
#26
Posted 07 May 2009 - 09:05 PM
Those other situations result in job loss MAYBE, but rarely career loss as it could in this case


#27
Posted 07 May 2009 - 09:21 PM
That cop in Sac that was drunk AND killed a kid (oh and fled after the incident) got 5 years, served less than 2. And remember that dimwit blond Brandy something or other who nearly killed the 2 cyclists? She got what, 1 year? Probably less with good behavior?
This cop may lose his job but he'll get more than a fair shake in court if he even goes. It'll probably be a year before anything happens and we'll all have forgotten about it so who knows.
It was probably the guy he got in a fight with that called him in.
#28
Posted 07 May 2009 - 09:23 PM
http://cbs13.com/bre....2.1003773.html
#29
Posted 07 May 2009 - 09:28 PM
Probably?
FTA: "by a patron claiming that Fardanesh ... had been involved in a physical altercation with the caller."
#30
Posted 07 May 2009 - 09:35 PM
Not necessarily. Many jobs nowadays require a background check. My company will not employ anyone without doing one, you need one before you get employed at a Financial institution, govt/state jobs etc.
Of course, everyone has the right to a fair trial and equal judgement - however, certain jobs carry greater responsibility and hence it is only right that the standards for employment are higher.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users