Not exclusive to this situation, I find the comments about shrink wrapped mops and sponges hilarious. I can't say that I disagree but I do recognize that any such effort to "salvage" items deemed to be for sanitary / cleaning purposes would open the District to severe criticism from the parent of every kid that comes home with a sniffle or a pimple.
Were the people complaining about shrink wrapped sponges paying attention when the kid with the peanut allergy sued the school district? Can you imagine the outfall as soon as one kid had a rash diagnosed as mold related and it was discovered that the FCUSD was using "contaminated" cleaning supplies? You can say that it wouldn't be an issue, but based on past experience I would say that is naive.
To clear up any confusion, nobody said the sponges and mops were shrink-wrapped. They were in the plastic bags from the manufacturer. You know, just like when you buy them from the store.
The books and educational materials were in the shrink wrap.
I think the whole mold concern is stretching things just a tad. I don't remember them throwing away the whole gym at FHS when the roof leaked.












