Jump to content






Photo
- - - - -

Folsom Fire Crash Tax


  • Please log in to reply
96 replies to this topic

#16 Robert Gary

Robert Gary

    Superstar

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 981 posts

Posted 14 May 2012 - 08:33 AM

Hmmm, no. They're collecting the same or less as private company would.


Do you know if they charge for police service if you call 911 from your home (even if its less than that charge by private security companies)? Wouldn't it make as much sense?

BTW: I have a friend who is a retired fire battalion chief. He said that fire fighters *hate* crash taxes themselves and don't believe the fire departments should be charging people for public service.

-Robert

#17 Redone

Redone

    Hall Of Famer

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,865 posts

Posted 14 May 2012 - 08:59 AM

Do you know if they charge for police service if you call 911 from your home (even if its less than that charge by private security companies)? Wouldn't it make as much sense?

BTW: I have a friend who is a retired fire battalion chief. He said that fire fighters *hate* crash taxes themselves and don't believe the fire departments should be charging people for public service.

-Robert


You're story is confusing.

Did you receive service from a Fire ENGINE or an AMBULANCE ?

I am not agreeing with the charges also, merely pointing out that in this metropolis of 2 million people the Fire depts have been providing Ambulance service since September 1992. It's not new. It's also not a "crash tax" since those target out of towners only.

#18 jpow5

jpow5

    Veteran

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 237 posts

Posted 14 May 2012 - 09:15 AM

It's too bad there wasn't more of an explanation of the charges on the bill. Perhaps the charges were not for the labor provided (which I think most of us agree is paid with our taxes) but rather for materials used during the call and for cleaning/sanitizing after the call? Granted $1751 still sounds like a lot for some gloves, gauze, etc that might be used in a minor accident. But if a person is transported, then I could see it getting a little higher with possible IV, etc.

#19 Robert Gary

Robert Gary

    Superstar

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 981 posts

Posted 14 May 2012 - 09:22 AM

You're story is confusing.

Did you receive service from a Fire ENGINE or an AMBULANCE ?

I am not agreeing with the charges also, merely pointing out that in this metropolis of 2 million people the Fire depts have been providing Ambulance service since September 1992. It's not new. It's also not a "crash tax" since those target out of towners only.


I'm not sure how I would know if the bill was for the engine or the paramedic. There is no itemization whatsoever on the bill. The only hint is that it says "Folsom Fire" on the top, and then asks me to send a check to some unknown processing company.

-Robert

It's too bad there wasn't more of an explanation of the charges on the bill. Perhaps the charges were not for the labor provided (which I think most of us agree is paid with our taxes) but rather for materials used during the call and for cleaning/sanitizing after the call? Granted $1751 still sounds like a lot for some gloves, gauze, etc that might be used in a minor accident. But if a person is transported, then I could see it getting a little higher with possible IV, etc.


Possibly, but the fact that both my son and his friend received a bill for the exact same amount leads me to believe its a fixed fee.

-Robert

#20 Redone

Redone

    Hall Of Famer

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,865 posts

Posted 14 May 2012 - 09:35 AM

I'm not sure how I would know if the bill was for the engine or the paramedic. There is no itemization whatsoever on the bill. The only hint is that it says "Folsom Fire" on the top, and then asks me to send a check to some unknown processing company.


If you they weren't transported, then there shouldn't be a bill.

#21 ambrno33

ambrno33

    All Star

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 424 posts
  • Location:Empire Ranch

Posted 14 May 2012 - 11:34 AM

I had the paramedics called on my behalf once when I was a student at Sac State. I didn't need care (passed out from not eating breakfast), and they left only taking my blood sugar and my name/phone number. My parents got a bill for around $500 for the same type of thing. The bill even said "while you may not have called for emergency service yourself, be happy that someone did in case it was an emergency".
We sent it to insurance and they took care of the whole thing.

#22 Robert Gary

Robert Gary

    Superstar

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 981 posts

Posted 14 May 2012 - 12:25 PM

I had the paramedics called on my behalf once when I was a student at Sac State.


Just curious. Paramedics or ambulance?

-Robert

#23 ambrno33

ambrno33

    All Star

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 424 posts
  • Location:Empire Ranch

Posted 14 May 2012 - 12:53 PM

Just curious. Paramedics or ambulance?

-Robert



I'm not positive because I never saw the vehicle... but I think that the bill was for an ambulance responding to the scene.

#24 Robert Gary

Robert Gary

    Superstar

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 981 posts

Posted 14 May 2012 - 01:07 PM

I'm not positive because I never saw the vehicle... but I think that the bill was for an ambulance responding to the scene.


Makes sense. An ambulance is part of a for-profit company and staffed by EMTs (basically a semester at community college). A paramedic unit is part of the fire department and is staffed by fire fighters.

-Robert

#25 MikeinFolsom

MikeinFolsom

    Living Legend

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,198 posts

Posted 14 May 2012 - 03:03 PM

I just got my crash tax bill from the Folsom Fire department as a result of my son's car accident last month. The bill really doesn't say anything on it, just pay $1751. My son's friend who was in the car with him at the accident said he also got the same bill for the same amount; again, nothing detailed. So do they just charge a flat fee for responding to the accident and then split it between those in the accident? I don't understand how they arrived at the number they did.
I know now that if I'm ever in an accident, and no one is hurt, I'm going to recommend we drive over to Starbucks to exchange information before the fire department shows up and starts handing out bills.

-Robert


You only get billed if you're transported.

#26 (MaxineR)

(MaxineR)
  • Visitors

Posted 14 May 2012 - 06:12 PM

It seems that doctors offices, dental offices and other health care related agencies have been trying to bill what ever they can get away with, even after you have paid a bill at the dentist office they may bill you again. It happened to me twice.

Of course, it’s always, “We’re so SORRY!” And passed off as a mistake.

Recently, I got charged a $5.00 a month fee for paying my car insurance company a monthly sum, instead of the full amount for a six month term. Only problem is, I PAID the whole six month term with one check!

I called them and of course, it was the same thing; “Oh, we are so sorry! It was just a mistake.”

Makes me think a person has to really watch every bill that comes along and in this case, I’d not pay the bill, until I got some details from somebody that wasn’t part of that agency.

#27 tsukiji

tsukiji

    Hall Of Famer

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,790 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Freedom. Family. Food. Funds.

Posted 14 May 2012 - 07:12 PM

You only get billed if you're transported.


They have a transporter? No wonder they're out of money!

I'd like to have a transporter - be great for commuting from Hawaii. :)

#28 Redone

Redone

    Hall Of Famer

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,865 posts

Posted 15 May 2012 - 05:11 AM

They have a transporter? No wonder they're out of money!

I'd like to have a transporter - be great for commuting from Hawaii. :)


You mean teleport ?

#29 Robert Gary

Robert Gary

    Superstar

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 981 posts

Posted 15 May 2012 - 07:38 AM

You only get billed if you're transported.


Its hard to know since the bill just says 'pay $1700'. It doesn't give any indication of what its for or what triggers it. If I'm in a car accident and not hurt I'm going to tell the Folsom Fire guys that I don't want a bill so don't do what ever it is that causes you to bill me. Even if I am hurt a little bit I can usually get into my primary that day or the next at a fraction of the cost of Folsom Fire. As consumers shouldn't we be informed of the cost of the service before its rendered if possible? Maybe Folsom Fire can carry menus with prices.

-Robert

#30 Robert Gary

Robert Gary

    Superstar

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 981 posts

Posted 15 May 2012 - 07:45 AM

Interesting article from 2010 about the growing epidemic of crash taxes. The state senate stuck down bill SB 49that would have outlawed crash taxes in California.

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/fire-department-bills-basic-services-horrify-residents-insurance/story?id=9736696

-Robert




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users