suggestions for traffic improvement
#16
Posted 30 July 2003 - 10:30 AM
Aren't these supposed to be the roads that keep traffic moving through the city and off the local roads? That would help traffic calming in neighborhoods. As it is, travel is often faster on side roads than on the main streets. AND, each of these lights seems to have those one-car sensors that will stop the entire main thoroughfare for one car to pass through immediately.
#17
Posted 30 July 2003 - 12:21 PM
#18
Posted 30 July 2003 - 02:10 PM
Before anyone faults the neighborhoods for causing the traffic problem, you need to look at your own driving habits and patterns. Would you want this occuring in your neighborhood? There are multiple ways to get from one place to another in Folsom, if we all did it with a little more courtesy, we would find ourselves in this situation. I don't feel sorry for anyone but the neighborhoods who have had to endure this for so long.
#19
Posted 30 July 2003 - 02:34 PM
#20
Posted 30 July 2003 - 06:20 PM
Open the Dam Road!
Apart from what appears to be a political ploy to get the feds to fund the new bridge (it's odd how suddenly we're getting federal approval so quickly now) it still seems unlikely that Terrorists would target Folsom over Hoover Dam, which is still open albiet with much tighter security.
Or we could at least do what Shasta Dam is doing by issueing pre-approved permits to cross. (see the link below)
http://www.usbr.gov/...2/MP-02-034.pdf
It seems to me that the politicians again are using us for their political agenda's. Simply inconvenience thousands of people, ruin neighborhoods, spread some fear into the mix, and viola! You get your pet project approved.
Sorry for the tirade, but I feel for the people who live in old town who want their streets back and for the commuters like myself. Open up the Dam than build the bridge.
Thanks, I feel better now.
#21
Posted 30 July 2003 - 09:52 PM
Although I *really* like that idea of applying for a permit to get over the dam road (for the time being). They could even do random searches and stuff, all the money from the permits (a nominal fee) would go towards the funding of it. I'm sure anyone who relied on that road to get to/from El Dorado Hills would pay for it.
#22
Posted 31 July 2003 - 09:33 AM
#23
Posted 31 July 2003 - 10:04 AM
The Folsom dam closing is obviously political. If you believe it isn't then ask yourself again in the fall when the water level is drawn down to the point where it is not a hazard and yet the dam will still be closed. Those darn terrorists are making my life difficult and we need to hunt them all down! Are you sure it's the terrorists making your life difficult? We spend a billion a day making Iraq "safe" and getting 36 million to partially fund a long overdue bridge takes an act of God.
How tough would it be to make the dam safe? Well you'd have to keep trucks off so for 50 grand you build a barrier at each end that only cars could fit under. A few guards and there you have it. It's not brain surgery - it's politics!
#24
Posted 31 July 2003 - 10:53 AM
The problem is that you really can't take advantage of turning right onto Folsom Blvd because the right turn lane doesn't appear until you're almost at the light. As a result, I turn right about the same time as everybody else is going across Rainbow Bridge. Maybe if the extend the right turn lane, I can save more time by not having to wait for multiple light changes.
BTW - I moved into Lexington Hills from Willow Creek last year. So my need to take the short cut has diminished drastically. The ironic part is that we were seriously considering moving into Briggs Ranch because it would be a quick jaunt across the Folsom Dam road to get across the river.
#25
Posted 21 August 2003 - 07:46 PM
#26
Posted 22 August 2003 - 11:49 AM
I'm not saying it's OK to speed through these areas, I am saying it should be OK to drive through them. They are roads, that is what they are intended for.
#27
Posted 23 August 2003 - 07:11 AM
The way traffic would stack up on Sutter and Coloma coming from Natoma to Scott St. must have caused a lot of exhaust fumes to come in their windows and doors.
I miss the convenience there but can understand how they feel. I don't know about traffic diversion on newer streets.
#28
Posted 24 August 2003 - 02:41 PM
#29
Posted 31 August 2003 - 01:25 PM
#30
Posted 31 August 2003 - 08:24 PM
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users












