QUOTE(benning @ Jan 4 2006, 10:14 AM)

Great idea...we have to nip this problem in the bud. I for one think that something should be done on the western side of East Bidwell (commercial centers) before it's too late. As for the residential neighborhoods, if the city would stop rolling over to developers who want to build 1700 sf homes on 2200 sf lots, then the older homes, with prices in the 400k range, would be more appealing and our older, smaller neighborhoods might reflect a little more pride of ownership.
While your at it. I woud suggest that even greater issues regarding the looks of yards be addressed along with this. If the City can say that they dont want to see CITY OWNED cans in sight of the street- they should also crack down hard on anyother unsightly items in the front yard. This includes those that have no clue about landscaping, have 30 palms that havent been trimmed in 20 years, use of tacky cherobs and other gnomes in their yards, any use of Privot bushes or trees, vines growing on the house that have been dead for 5 years or more, any car older than 10 years, tacky blow up holiday figures, Roses that have not been trimmed of dead blooms, all the ugly swamp ( pin) oaks that hold their dead leaves through the entire winter, front doors painted anything but white , black or brown, force all houses to be repainted every 5 years , dead spots in lawns, oh- and anything in the front yard that is not natural- and just bad taste....
City could package the whole thing up and force it on the resedents and we would have a great improvement in the looks of the nieghborhoods. Sure there are other items I have left off..
This is silly for the city to cover their bu tts and then suggest the resident have to pay to keep the street looking nice...
Cheers
Ken