Posted 22 December 2009 - 03:23 PM
It's easy enough to deal with the complaints from posters who feel they have been abused by another poster, without trashing the whole political section:
Write in a condition to entering the politics section by making them agree to a "Ego Damage Disclaimer".
Which means one must agree that to enter into the politics section, they agree they may be offended or insulted and won't complain if that happens.
If it would be more comfortable for the moderators, to NOT babysit the political section at all.... let's NOT have any do that.
If there are no moderators taking any action, that will make me feel that there are also none that will act unfairly when deciding who to delete or who to warn. Under those conditions I would feel that to place an offending poster on "ignore" to be enough to deal with the problem of being offended by them. I had decided to do that, and did, just before the politics section was shut down. It worked for me.
I'm an adult and would rather be treated like one, than have to be babysit like other posters, who continuously break the rules.
Let's drop the rules in the political section, relieve the moderators of having to go to the politics section and place the disclaimer up in large red letters for all to see, so they know they can't run to John or the moderators with hurt feelings.
Will it get ugly? Not if mature members who have a mature attitude place the offenders on ignore and don't respond to their ugly posts. The offenders will go away when they can't get under anybodies skin and others ignore them. But another way to deal with that is for them to be advised they can be banned, without warning, if they become too nasty to other posters.
No warnings, no time out, no points taken away....just banned, without notice.
Surely something can be put into place that automatically deletes their account when they go beyond a certain number of cuss words.
That would at least get that problem taken care of. Or any cuss words would automatically reject a post from being posted.
If not moderating the political forum isn't attractive to John, then have a moderator who WANTS to do the job, put in charge of it. Give them full responsibility and the power to enforce the rules, if there are any. Forcing a moderator to do a job they dislike, with no wages isn't going to work, it's clear. So, find one that WANTS to do it.
I have a member in mind, who I feel is very fair and also objective. I'll tell John their name if he wants to PM me.