Posted 16 May 2013 - 07:30 AM
17 homes for 2.6 acres is .15 acres per lot. Not postage stamp size, but not very big either (about 6500 sq ft). However, you have to subtract for streets and other improvements, so the lots will be much smaller proportionally. Probably around .11 acre per lot (tiny! around 4800 sq ft). Doesn't really seem appropriate in a neighborhood where most homes alone are close to the size of those lots.
Town homes would seem a better usage for that many units in that small of an area.
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive" -- C.S. Lewis
If the only way to combat "global warming" was to lower taxes, we would never hear of the issue again. - Anonymous
"Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one" — Thomas Paine, 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘰𝘯 𝘚𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘦 (1776)