SAVE THE AMERICAN RIVER ASSOCIATION
____________________________________________________________________________________________
If you wish to make a tax-deductible donation to SARA to protect the American River, go to www.sarariverwatch.org
Posted 29 July 2013 - 01:37 PM
SAVE THE AMERICAN RIVER ASSOCIATION
____________________________________________________________________________________________
If you wish to make a tax-deductible donation to SARA to protect the American River, go to www.sarariverwatch.org
Posted 30 July 2013 - 11:33 AM
My Grandson and I were hiking around in this area. We were both wishing there were a paved trail down to the river. Also, It makes no sense to me to have a bike trail going around the lake that stops at the historic district. At a minimum the bike trail needs to be completed to the foot bridge.

Posted 30 July 2013 - 11:35 AM
My Grandson and I were hiking around in this area. We were both wishing there were a paved trail down to the river. Also, It makes no sense to me to have a bike trail going around the lake that stops at the historic district. At a minimum the bike trail needs to be completed to the foot bridge.
Cute pic.
I thought they said they couldn't complete it to the foot bridge because of a ravine.
Posted 30 July 2013 - 11:56 AM
The powerhouse is an Nationally Registered Historical Landmark and an official state park and it changes the historic integrity to punch a bike trail through there. The current plan, if I am correct, is to have the bike trail added along the north lane of Leidesdorff in front of Karen's Bakery so it connects to the bike trail over at Riley leading down to the truss bridge.
by the way, you should be able to find a good trail there already. I have walked it many times.
Posted 30 July 2013 - 12:22 PM
There are many easy and complete accesses to the river, including brand new handicapped accesses which cost a lot of money because they were done correctly.
The ravine is a geological feature. Ownership involves State of CA which does not believe in putting concrete and masonry retaining walls on every inch of riverbank below a dam. State Parks investigated crossing this natural watercourse. It is the WRONG place to interfere with a watercourse. Besides the natural ravine filters the water flowing into the river. It is critical to clean runoff. You don't concrete over waterways.
Isn't the reason people enjoy that ravine its natural state and beauty??
Why would anyone want to put over a half mile of concrete and asphalt on a riverbank which directly below a dam, and subject to natural water runoff???? To get grant money, under-improve (then keep the change)??? Who believes the city?
Posted 05 August 2013 - 02:54 PM
Darth Lefty, on 20 Jun 2013 - 4:10 PM, said:
Yes they do, so what's the point of it here? Avoiding the ten bucks, maybe. Your pejoratively-decribed "ADA ramp" is actually a nice little walking trail with some scenic overlooks, which is nice, I'm sure people will enjoy it. Like I said, I don't object to it. But it's not really a path to the boat ramp, except in a roundabout way. I suppose with a paddleboard or a kayak the steps would be all right, with a canoe on your shoulders it would be a real pain.
The plan shows a kayak/bike rack, that sounds like fun. Anyone know where I can get a kayak/bike?
Darth,
I've carried a canoe and 50 lb pack up to 5 miles daily on trips for portaging. And that is unimproved swampy, mosquito infested paths. Not much sympathy from me. ![]()
-Robert
Posted 05 August 2013 - 08:51 PM
Darth Lefty, on 20 Jun 2013 - 4:10 PM, said:
Darth,
I've carried a canoe and 50 lb pack up to 5 miles daily on trips for portaging. And that is unimproved swampy, mosquito infested paths. Not much sympathy from me.
-Robert
Posted 14 May 2014 - 07:47 AM
The suit against the waterfront trail project was struck down. The project will go forward.
Posted 14 May 2014 - 11:34 AM
I know a lot of people are not going to be happy with this decision, However i'm looking forward to having an easily accessible access to lake Natoma from the Historic District to enjoy with my family.
I understand that. I just hope they leave things as natural as possible.
Posted 14 May 2014 - 03:34 PM
I know a lot of people are not going to be happy with this decision, However i'm looking forward to having an easily accessible access to lake Natoma from the Historic District to enjoy with my family.
I understand that. I just hope they leave things as natural as possible.
I too am looking forward to it. I expect it will become a popular asset to our community.
I know a lot of people are opposed to it and think it should be left natural, but someone reminded me that it's not a natural lake, that it was created by the dam, and its creation flooded the site of the historic Negro Bar settlement.
I do hope and expect that it will be well executed and that the residents and citizens will respect it.
Steve Heard
Folsom Real Estate Specialist
EXP Realty
BRE#01368503
Owner - MyFolsom.com
916 718 9577
Posted 14 May 2014 - 03:55 PM
Posted 14 May 2014 - 04:02 PM
It's going to be absolutely covered in graffiti as soon as it opens.
If you call them petroglyphs then it's natural and historic and you can feel good about it
Posted 14 May 2014 - 04:13 PM
I too am looking forward to it. I expect it will become a popular asset to our community.
I know a lot of people are opposed to it and think it should be left natural, but someone reminded me that it's not a natural lake, that it was created by the dam, and its creation flooded the site of the historic Negro Bar settlement.
I do hope and expect that it will be well executed and that the residents and citizens will respect it.
Your last line is what I'm hoping for, too.
When I said leave it "natural," what I meant was the less concrete the better. I'm hoping that if they replace vegetation it isn't with parking-lot -variety shrubs. They can take out all the poison oak they want. Even if that stuff is natural, I won't miss it.
Posted 14 May 2014 - 05:53 PM
Your last line is what I'm hoping for, too.
When I said leave it "natural," what I meant was the less concrete the better. I'm hoping that if they replace vegetation it isn't with parking-lot -variety shrubs. They can take out all the poison oak they want. Even if that stuff is natural, I won't miss it.
I hope the City of Folsom Political Staff reconsiders........another action they did not ask the Citizens of Folsom.
All for leaving it as is. All they have to do is dump some recycled bark to the trail and install a Dog Poop Dispenser at the river's edge.
The view from the Northside of the river is going to be ruined. We are going to be looking at a Hotel Parking Lot.

Posted 14 May 2014 - 07:23 PM
I'm with Steve and Ducky on this one.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users