
Folsom High Lawsuit
#46
Posted 28 April 2005 - 08:49 PM
And after seeing what kindof people they are I sue would use their business Kinsellas Tractor because of how negetive and non supportive of the school they seem to be
http://www.acsevents.../ca/folsom/zach
#47
Posted 28 April 2005 - 10:53 PM
Years ago when I used to march in my highschool band program, we had to shell out over 200-300 dollars just to be able to go to the school football games, competitions, parades, etc. When some of us couldn't afford it (which would happen quite often), we ALL participated in fund-raising activities. EVERYONE did their work and paid their dues because they wanted to be there. This woman is going to ruin it for all these kids. I can't stand it when people think that filing lawsuits will solve problems. They only create more!
And another note, our booster association (who was operated by the parents and they worked tirelessly!) was incredible. They did everything they could to make sure we had the funds to get where we needed to go. If it wasn't for them, our former band program would have completely disappeared.
Someone needs to knock sense into this woman. This just makes me very angry!

#48
Posted 29 April 2005 - 10:19 AM
#49
Posted 29 April 2005 - 01:55 PM
Anyone else who is even thinking about joining this lawsuit... SHAME ON YOU!
#50
Posted 30 April 2005 - 08:01 AM
Donna has tried to work with the Boosters and the School Board for 2 years. All she wants is for the "fee/dues" to be properly termed donations. Instead the Boosters continue to bill parents for Fees or Dues stating they are due upon receipt of invoice. The bills are not for extra cricular acitivies but for regular music classes conducted during school by a school employee (music teacher) for which the students receive a grade. The Education Code and prior court cases have held that fees/dues/payments cannot be required for such classes.
Fi the Boosters and/or school district had changed the term to donation none of this would be happening. The fees range from $550 to over $800 per school year. If kids are in more than one band they can be billed in excess of $1300 per school year. The Boosters promote themselves as tax-exempt but do not let parents know that if they are really tax-exempt the fees are tax deductible.
In 2003 Donna hired a CPA to audit the Boosters books. The CPA found a number of irregularities which Donna presented to the school board in Sept. 2004. At the next School Board meeting the Boosters showed up which needed up it a character assassination on Donna instead of addressing the real issues.
The Boosters will say that if you have any questions to just ask anyone on their Board. But when you do, you are no longer on their team and are ostracized.
#51
Posted 30 April 2005 - 08:06 AM
Donna was left with no choise but to comtemplate a class action lawsuit. The Boosters and the School District knew this was all wrong yet choose to ignore it. Now they must defend that position.
Bottom line: If the Boosters want to run a music program like a private organization and collect money for participation then they need to take it outside the school and stop using school resources. If they continue to operate within the school music program, they need to comply with the applicable Government Codes and regulations. The Boosters and School District only have themselves to blame for this mess.
#52
Posted 30 April 2005 - 08:12 AM
And after seeing what kindof people they are I sue would use their business Kinsellas Tractor because of how negetive and non supportive of the school they seem to be
YOu shouldn't write about what you don't know about Zach. These are not optional field trips but required and if you don't go your grade for the class is lowered. The issues isn't ability to pay but operating within the law. I hope you do believe people and organizations should operate within the law.
#53
Posted 30 April 2005 - 08:18 AM
For marching band approximately $550 and for jazz band more than $800. If kids are in both bands it is over $1300 yearly. This is for a regular school class which they attend during school hours and receive a grade, not an extra circular class. All the Boosters needed to do is re-phrase their bills to so Donations and not Fees or Dues and this would not have come to this.
#54
Posted 30 April 2005 - 08:25 AM
What took her so long ? ?
#55
Posted 30 April 2005 - 08:27 AM
I was under the impression that this was money that was due for the marching band (extracarricular activities). When I was in my high school jazz band and symphonic band, the only thing I had to pay was a small lab fee (~$20-$40). What doesn't make sense is that why in the world does the jazz band have to pay more than the marching band?! I would have figured the other way around. I fully understand fees for marching band but not for bands that are a part of a class grade.
#56
Posted 30 April 2005 - 09:14 AM
Donna has tried to work with the Boosters and the School Board for 2 years. All she wants is for the "fee/dues" to be properly termed donations. Instead the Boosters continue to bill parents for Fees or Dues stating they are due upon receipt of invoice. The bills are not for extra cricular acitivies but for regular music classes conducted during school by a school employee (music teacher) for which the students receive a grade. The Education Code and prior court cases have held that fees/dues/payments cannot be required for such classes.
Fi the Boosters and/or school district had changed the term to donation none of this would be happening. The fees range from $550 to over $800 per school year. If kids are in more than one band they can be billed in excess of $1300 per school year. The Boosters promote themselves as tax-exempt but do not let parents know that if they are really tax-exempt the fees are tax deductible.
In 2003 Donna hired a CPA to audit the Boosters books. The CPA found a number of irregularities which Donna presented to the school board in Sept. 2004. At the next School Board meeting the Boosters showed up which needed up it a character assassination on Donna instead of addressing the real issues.
The Boosters will say that if you have any questions to just ask anyone on their Board. But when you do, you are no longer on their team and are ostracized.
Welcome to the forum!
I have some additional questions maybe you can answer since you seem to have some additional information.
Has Donna ever paid these dues?
It has been my experience with the nonprofits and booster groups I have worked with, that they are generally always seeking people to serve on their Boards. How many times has Donna volunteered to serve on the Music Boosters Board? If she was on the board she could then correct what she felt was wrong. Also she could then help trim the "fat" out of the administration. If a majority of the members feel this way, she probably would be recognized as a hero, correct?
If she needed clarification if the fees were tax deductible or not or if the organization was tax exempt, why didn't she contact the IRS, rather than an attorney?
If she truly felt the district was operating inapproprioately by requiring dues for classes, did she contact the grand Jury or the file acomplaint with Department of Education or the state agency that oversees this area?
Answering these questions would greatly clarify some concerns.
Thank you and again welcome to the forum!
#57
Posted 30 April 2005 - 09:51 AM
I was under the impression that this was money that was due for the marching band (extracarricular activities). When I was in my high school jazz band and symphonic band, the only thing I had to pay was a small lab fee (~$20-$40). What doesn't make sense is that why in the world does the jazz band have to pay more than the marching band?! I would have figured the other way around. I fully understand fees for marching band but not for bands that are a part of a class grade.
#58
Posted 30 April 2005 - 01:00 PM
#59
Posted 30 April 2005 - 01:01 PM
#60
Posted 30 April 2005 - 02:01 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users