83 replies to this topic

[GrumpyOldGuy]

Chris,  for a guy who claims to be savvy in technology, you miss some things.  "C₂H₅OH?"  is a subtle way to ask if you've had too much to drink after your (seemingly incoherent) post.  Check out what  C₂H₅OH is.  A favorite compound for many.

[Chris]

Chris,  for a guy who claims to be savvy in technology, you miss some things.  "C₂H₅OH?"  is a subtle way to ask if you've had too much to drink after your (seemingly incoherent) post.  Check out what  C₂H₅OH is.  A favorite compound for many.

Yep, got what you meant and you missed my Homer Simpson play.......    "c2h5oh is the solution to all life problems." (Homer Simpson).  

 

And I ask you again to explain to us why CO2 PPM was at about 1800 just a 100 million years ago...?   You always seem to ignore that question for some reason......?   Why are you so afraid of 400 ppm CO2 and tell us that the sky is falling....?   And tell us that Man is responsible for it....      Some 400 million years ago CO2 ppm was over 4000.   All before Man existed and the Earth did very well thank you very much.   So do as Homer says, sit back, relax, have a glass of Merlot and stop worrying about silly CO2 levels, it will all be fine.   Chris

 

 

[2 Aces]

[GrumpyOldGuy]

I don't watch TV cartoon shows.

[Chris]

I don't watch TV cartoon shows.

Actually neither do I but my millennial adult children try to educate me in these matters so I am a little more savvy in new technology and current events than I otherwise would be.   I just loaded Instagram and Snapchat onto my phone last week and I must admit I really don't see the point and I have trouble figuring them out.   I hear I should stay away from things called "tinder" and "grinder".   I don't think I want to know what those are....   although I have a slight idea.   Probably all bad.   Chris

 

Oh, and anything on those ancient CO2 levels you'd like to comment on....?   Still waiting.......

[2 Aces]

[GrumpyOldGuy]

I provided extensive explanations to you several months ago in another forum.  Go back and review them.  Oh wait...my explanations involved things like calculus, rates of change, exponential acceleration, natural logs, 2nd derivatives.  You had no clue about any of it.  So you don't need to go back.  Waste of your time.  You'll never get it. 

[4thgenFolsomite]

I provided extensive explanations to you several months ago in another forum.  Go back and review them.  Oh wait...my explanations involved things like calculus, rates of change, exponential acceleration, natural logs, 2nd derivatives.  You had no clue about any of it.  So you don't need to go back.  Waste of your time.  You'll never get it.

It's almost frightening to see how some people can't acknowledge what is happening around them. Not sure if it's out of tunnel vision or fear. Take comfort knowing that changing their minds won't make any difference to what is happening to the environment. Things are in motion and many people will continue to deny it no matter what evidence is presented. i am not sure we can do anything ourselves other than conserve energy and be mindful. It's unfortunate that the changes we all see can't be discussed without being subject to insult. At least here. I am disappointed in Folsom, though.

[Chris]

I provided extensive explanations to you several months ago in another forum.  Go back and review them.  Oh wait...my explanations involved things like calculus, rates of change, exponential acceleration, natural logs, 2nd derivatives.  You had no clue about any of it.  So you don't need to go back.  Waste of your time.  You'll never get it. 

This chart destroys all of you BS arguments in favor of your stupid AGW argument.   Maybe that is why you always ignore it....?   Chris

 

[2 Aces]

Oh, yes, Al Gore's *carbon footprint*. What a disingenuous pig he is. What do you global warming *cultists* think about Gore? Oh, and why does he have an ocean villa if *rising seas* are going to cover coastal properties any day now? Follow the money, folks. It's not hard to do.  

 

 

[GrumpyOldGuy]

Chris - as stated, in another forum, I've already explained in detail why your chart is mostly irrelevant.  If you don't understand the analysis, there's not much more I can do.  

[Chris]

Chris - as stated, in another forum, I've already explained in detail why your chart is mostly irrelevant.  If you don't understand the analysis, there's not much more I can do.  

Funny how you often characterize me as incoherent, not understanding, not savvy, uninformed, and not capable of following your "brilliant" analysis.  I am not sure of your educational level but with my undergraduate degree in a physical science (you know which one...) and my working in the biological sciences, in a lab, on the production floor for some 30 years now I assure you I am well equipped to counter your silly AGW at every turn.  Please carry on, I so do enjoy your silly attempts to pass off your progressive political AGW agenda as actual science.   Chris

 

Oh, and I still see you can't explain or excuse away past CO2 levels of 1800 ppm and even over 4000 ppm on Earth, even before we existed.   

[GrumpyOldGuy]

Chris - as stated, in another forum, I've already explained in detail why your chart is mostly irrelevant.  If you don't understand the analysis, there's not much more I can do.

[2 Aces]

Old Guy is a lost cause and a liar, Chris. Also, I'm pretty disappointed in 4thGen, as it appears that he has bought into the fraud of global warming. They probably don't even have the guts to watch the video that Olivia posted 2 days ago on this thread, as it would shatter their belief in global warming. Global warming is their religion. It's a cult in the truest sense of the word. It's just weird. Pretty sad that actual adults can be brainwashed like that. Sorry, 4thGen, I call 'em like I see 'em.

 

 

 

[Chris]

Chris - as stated, in another forum, I've already explained in detail why your chart is mostly irrelevant.  If you don't understand the analysis, there's not much more I can do.

You explained nothing, you can't.  You and your fellow AGW climate clowns throw out the scientific method approach by not having all the data, ignoring data, and manipulating data.  Then you use your flawed method to come to a flawed conclusion.  Once again, George Carlin to set you straight.   Chris