Javascript Disabled Detected

You currently have javascript disabled. Several functions may not work. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality.

Hotel Development Vs. National Register Site

Started by FolsomPreservation , Mar 14 2010 11:07 AM

«
Prev

Please log in to reply

64 replies to this topic

#61 Dave Burrell

Folsom Citizen

Moderator
17,588 posts

Gender:Male
Location:Folsom
Interests:Beer, Photography, Travel, Art

Posted 21 April 2010 - 07:33 AM

We don't need another hotel and we don't need to pave over more of our paradise.

This is from The Heritage Preservation League of Folsom

For more details about this, visit their website

Travel, food and drink blog by Dave - http://davestravels.tv

Back to top

#62 camay2327

GO NAVY

Moderator
11,481 posts

Gender:Male
Location:Folsom

Posted 21 April 2010 - 05:53 PM

I am sure that this will be passed by the city council by at least a 4-1 vote.

Kerri may vote against it but I can't see any of the others doing it.

The city needs the tax dollars...

A VETERAN Whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a blank check made payable to "The United States of America" for an amount "up to and including their life". That is HONOR, and there are way too many people in this country who no longer understand it. -Author unknown-

Back to top

#63 Tink

Netizen

Registered Members
32 posts

Posted 29 April 2010 - 08:07 AM

QUOTE (old soldier @ Mar 15 2010, 09:17 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

wonder which power brokers have been hired to support or shoot down the project.

Former Mayor/Council member Bob Holderness is the representative hired by the Developer, Nick Alexander of Roseville. They are asking to use City Property for their landscape easements since the amount of on site development so extraordinarily covers the property that they can't even put in the landscaping REQUIRED for the project by all City Standards.

Back to top

#64 PayingAttention

Netizen

Registered Members
31 posts

Posted 30 April 2010 - 07:10 PM

QUOTE (Tink @ Apr 29 2010, 09:07 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Former Mayor/Council member Bob Holderness is the representative hired by the Developer, Nick Alexander of Roseville. They are asking to use City Property for their landscape easements since the amount of on site development so extraordinarily covers the property that they can't even put in the landscaping REQUIRED for the project by all City Standards.

I hope that won't be allowed. It sounds like this project was reworked to allow for the most hotel that could fit on the property. I am all for leaving that corner in it's natural state. That corner is now a buffer between the nature we love and the reality of our development.

I'm afraid to see this built, and have it become yet another hotel in town with 6 cars parked at it on any given day. Where is it written that we must have massive retail/commercial builds at each exit for our city?

Back to top

#65 Tink

Netizen

Registered Members
32 posts

Posted 01 May 2010 - 08:46 AM

QUOTE (PayingAttention @ Apr 30 2010, 08:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I hope that won't be allowed. It sounds like this project was reworked to allow for the most hotel that could fit on the property. I am all for leaving that corner in it's natural state. That corner is now a buffer between the nature we love and the reality of our development.

I'm afraid to see this built, and have it become yet another hotel in town with 6 cars parked at it on any given day. Where is it written that we must have massive retail/commercial builds at each exit for our city?

Please see the updated information regarding the City Council Hearing for this project under thread title "Folsom Blvd Hotel project..." I hope you will attend the hearing on May 11, 6:30 p.m. and let the Council know what you think of this project. Thanks for "paying attention".