What have our teachers given up? Three days? 1.6 % of their pay? Compare that to the tentative agreement made with Elk Grove yesterday. I don't think that our teachers have given up more than other districts teachers have. They also have not given up what our state employees or many people working in the private sector have. When there is no money, a company lets employees go, reduces their pay, freezes hiring and/or freezes hiring. The school districts have to do the same. Why should they be exempt from taking action to save jobs and services to students?

FCUSD Budget Central
#61
Posted 19 May 2010 - 06:37 AM
What have our teachers given up? Three days? 1.6 % of their pay? Compare that to the tentative agreement made with Elk Grove yesterday. I don't think that our teachers have given up more than other districts teachers have. They also have not given up what our state employees or many people working in the private sector have. When there is no money, a company lets employees go, reduces their pay, freezes hiring and/or freezes hiring. The school districts have to do the same. Why should they be exempt from taking action to save jobs and services to students?
#62
Posted 19 May 2010 - 07:49 AM
Hope you don't mind--I kinda tweaked your message to clarify a few points, a little.
#63
Posted 19 May 2010 - 09:29 AM
I was hoping to get an answer to my question from the teachers, specifically "teach". This person implies our teachers have sacrificed so much, and I'd really like to know what they have actually "given up."
#64
Posted 19 May 2010 - 11:43 AM
The agreement throughout talks about a reduction in the teachers' work year. Then, I see that there is that one reference in the fourth Exhibit that reduces the student's days. Sooner: keep in mind that neither the teachers nor the board have ratified the agreement yet. It can still make more sense to some of us that we might take the days off from the non-student days than decrease the student's time in school. With agreements like in EGUSD they have to do both -- lucky them!
You might want to look at some really sizeable districts to see that other teachers' associations around the state are taking substantially more days, in addition to freezing step and column automatic increases. Elk Grove is just the latest.
Question: I assume the $140 decrease you're referencing is from the furlough days taken for 09-10.
Was that before or after you received the automatic increase(s)?
FYI, RC has the same pay scale and benefits that Folsom does. The district does not differentiate between areas when hiring and assigning staff.
One more note: With 9 furlough days and column freeze, Elk Grove is still only able to rescind 2/3 of their layoff notices.
#65
Posted 19 May 2010 - 12:02 PM
What makes it difficult in Folsom? All the parent involvement in the classrooms? Them telling you how to teach? Have you ever taught in Del Paso Heights? You ought to be thankful you are in Folsom.
#66
Posted 19 May 2010 - 01:03 PM
Thanks, JoAnne for letting people know that the position was changed and will save money. I want to also clarify that the position as it has been constituted has NEVER been at the rate indicated by this poster. I'm not sure where they got that incorrect information. The salary schedules are posted at http://www.fcusd.org..._department.htm.
#67
Posted 19 May 2010 - 02:34 PM
I don't mind at all. Thank you.
#68
Posted 19 May 2010 - 03:46 PM
#69
Posted 19 May 2010 - 05:01 PM
My bs detector is going crazy...I would like some more details of this...
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive" -- C.S. Lewis
If the only way to combat "global warming" was to lower taxes, we would never hear of the issue again. - Anonymous
"Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one" — Thomas Paine, 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘰𝘯 𝘚𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘦 (1776)
#70
Posted 19 May 2010 - 06:11 PM
This is true. I paid $977 a month for my husband and I this past year. The new rate is $1,155 a month for Health Net HMO. Dental will be about $100 more a month for us. I could go with Kaiser that would be about $780- to $970 a month depending on which option.
We, or I should say the union, bargained away our benefits years ago.
After taxes, retirement, and every other deduction, my check is about $3,800 a month. You know I am not teaching for the money.
Before the school board member that does not like teachers says anything, I am not complaining. You asked for facts. You can also go on the website and see the rate schedule. I love my job and I love being a teacher. I am very proud of my school and my students. I have taught in this district so long that I have been through 5 or 6 supes who have made their changes and moved merrily along. I bet I am also here longer than the current one.
Ask more questions. Ask how much admin pays monthly for their medical coverage. Ask how much retired admin. pay monthly for continued coverage. Ask. Make someone tell you.
Hey, also ask them to come and look at the condition of my classroom desk so they can have that decrepit image in their minds as they order all the new furniture for the new district office. Maybe I can have their "old" furniture.
#71
Posted 19 May 2010 - 08:24 PM

Fact for most of us is that insurance rates are increasing. I get health insurance for our family through my business, and the rates for an 80/20 with major deductible is still around $600 per month. We pay, pay, and pay for health insurance and uncovered costs. It's a fact of life in tihs U.S.
#72
Posted 19 May 2010 - 08:28 PM
You can't generalize from district to district about pay and benefits, it is different for each district and each group, certificated, non certificated and admin. I am happy with my pay, the benefits are much more expensive than my husbands with Intel so the kids are on his and I love my job most of the time. Please don't confuse our benefits with Sac City or other districts.
#73
Posted 19 May 2010 - 08:30 PM
We, or I should say the union, bargained away our benefits years ago.
After taxes, retirement, and every other deduction, my check is about $3,800 a month. You know I am not teaching for the money.
Before the school board member that does not like teachers says anything, I am not complaining. You asked for facts. You can also go on the website and see the rate schedule. I love my job and I love being a teacher. I am very proud of my school and my students. I have taught in this district so long that I have been through 5 or 6 supes who have made their changes and moved merrily along. I bet I am also here longer than the current one.
Ask more questions. Ask how much admin pays monthly for their medical coverage. Ask how much retired admin. pay monthly for continued coverage. Ask. Make someone tell you.
Hey, also ask them to come and look at the condition of my classroom desk so they can have that decrepit image in their minds as they order all the new furniture for the new district office. Maybe I can have their "old" furniture.
All completely true! Yes, teachers continue to take HUGE hits. Yes, we are grateful for jobs, yes, we are grateful for benefits, etc, etc. However...consider this: in the coming 2010-2011 year we'll see benefits costs at over $1000/month (depending on family size and chosen coverage) AND most likely at least 30 kids in each class (after many years of class size reduction and one year of approximately 24-25.) This last item is what TRULY WORRIES me. Effective teachers will adjust accordingly, but contact time with each individual child, one-on-one teaching time that is EVER SO IMPORTANT will greatly diminish. As a FCUSD union member - I would do just about ANYTHING to keep class size reduction, were it even offered as an option. Grades 1 and 2 as we know them in Folsom Cordova are about to completely change, and definitely NOT for the better. I would be interested in seeing an academic comparison study (you know someone will do one) on 20:1 students vs. those that will now be in 30:1. We shall see.
#74
Posted 19 May 2010 - 09:16 PM
Do you mean it's not offered as an option because the union doesn't want it to be? Because it looked to me that if the teachers were willing to furlough 6 days instead of 3, that could save semi-CSR (not what we used to have, but what we have now).
Sigh. This whole thing sucks - for everyone.
#75
Posted 19 May 2010 - 10:41 PM
I'll continue to follow this thread, but I'm done for now since anything I can add will not change anything. We are in an economic crisis because our state legislators have put us in this position. It is not the district's fault, teachers fault, etc.
I am glad to teach. I am glad I have a job. I am not under paid, but I am certainly NOT over paid either. I will do my best with the extra students next year. The children will learn, but maybe not as fast or as much. Some of the fun art projects might be slashed or reduced because of the extra kids and less room to work.
Thanks for those who support teachers because we love and need your support!
Sigh. This whole thing sucks - for everyone.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users