You have every right to read or believe what ever it is you want to! I'm not defending nor disputing anything that has been reported about this incident. All along, I've said lets wait until all the facts come out.
If you want to use the Daily Kos as your source for info, that is your right. You gotta open your mind to the fact Daily Kos is a very biased and has slanted reporting, like many others out there.
I can flat out tell you from first hand experience of getting punched in the nose, I fell backwards. ( I know I made some people happy over sharing this).
The bottom line is this, I suspect all of us would probably shoot someone who was pounding our head on the concrete if we thought we were going to die to save ourselves. Its human nature to try and protect ourselves.
For the life of me I can't understand what is so hard to acknowledge this, unless by admitting to this it creates doubts amongst people who have already made up ther minds about this incident? Some people jump to conclusions on issues based upon on a misguided sense of fairness and disregard the facts and the law. In this particular case its easy to look at an 17 year old walking home, unarmed, wearing a hoodie and having skittles in his pocket and getting shot by some wannabe and thinking this shouldn't happen. I agree it shouldn't have happened, but it did and now the system has to sort through the FACTs as they apply to the law.
You can't allow your emotions to decide what is legal or not!
My asking the question I did upset some because it challenged them to rethink their beliefs.
Nice try, Like I said before--I came up with opinion well before I came across this website. The bottome line of your theory should be--if your life felt threatened you would be willing to shoot someone to get them off off you. Regardless of whether you kill the person or not.
My bottom line on your previous theory is that you don't know that that person could have had the wherewithal to shoot someone after having his head slammed into concrete. It is my contention that under the statement he gave; he would not have been able to do so. It doesn't matter if if he did; because he woldn't have been able to do so. A much more plausible scenario is that treyvon was kneeling or standing and zimmerman shot the kid in the abdomen at close range.
You dont know this- you were not there! Stop listening to the media. Im sure there are so many facts we dont know about....because we were not there!!!!!!
blah, blah, blah----this is a discussion forum. This is what we do here. discuss events. You don't lke it--go away.
The story is news worthy and deserves attention because it involves the highest crime a person can committ inthis country.
If you don't like it, too bad. Find another thread to read.
ps..stop assuming im getting my opinions based on media outlets. Whats wrong with you, any?
You tell me to not listen to media but then you try to jump a springboard commentary down our throats about the black panthers, al sharpton, and your dislike of the media?
get your dislike of stories from a source other than the media if you dislike the media so much!