
Voter Fraud Is A Non-Issue
#61
Posted 22 August 2012 - 12:49 PM
us old folks have to be ashamed of how we have educated our young, because they are buying the old act that is going to make their lives is the USA a lot less happy than us old folks
#62
Posted 30 August 2012 - 06:15 AM
Many suspected ineligible CO voters US citizens
AP Report
State officials were able to run 1,400 of those names through a federal immigration database and found that more than 1,200 were U.S. citizens. Verification of the remaining names is still pending, but so far, the search hasn't turned up any non-citizens registered to vote.
Whoa! Could it be Tio Vinny is right after all?
A total of 1,566 letters went to Democrats and 1,794 went to unaffiliated voters. Another 486 letters were sent to Republicans.
Can you say "witch hunt?"
#63
Posted 30 August 2012 - 07:35 AM
Can you say "witch hunt?"
Tiovinny, you seem to ignore anything that anybody posts back to you as proof that this issue is real. You totally ignored these stories I posted up for you to read on the last page. Read them and get back to us with your thoughts please. Don't cherry pick your stories, you're only fooling yourself. Chris
http://seattletimes....tefraud27m.html
http://en.wikipedia...._election,_2004
http://www.freerepub...s/1311655/posts
http://www.appeal-de...ud-franken.html
1A - 2A = -1A
#64
(The Dude)
Posted 30 August 2012 - 07:46 AM
there is a darn good chance this country is on its last legs, and history will probably say it was because of dumb voters, who can't even balance their checkbook turned the old tide. this will happen too because obama and his gang have found ways to make them more and more dependent on the old government and his media folks have designed ad's designed to pull the wool over the eyes of the not so smart voters who buy the ads
us old folks have to be ashamed of how we have educated our young, because they are buying the old act that is going to make their lives is the USA a lot less happy than us old folks
Old soldier is right again!
#65
Posted 30 August 2012 - 09:30 AM
It is still actually true, but now for monetary and mobility reasons.Are you implying that black people are less capable then others of obtaining an I.D. ? This might have been an issue for some over half a centry ago in the south. I think we have moved forward since then.
#66
Posted 30 August 2012 - 09:33 AM
None of those links work for me. FyiTiovinny, you seem to ignore anything that anybody posts back to you as proof that this issue is real. You totally ignored these stories I posted up for you to read on the last page. Read them and get back to us with your thoughts please. Don't cherry pick your stories, you're only fooling yourself. Chris
http://seattletimes....tefraud27m.html
http://en.wikipedia...._election,_2004
http://www.freerepub...s/1311655/posts
http://www.appeal-de...ud-franken.html
#67
Posted 30 August 2012 - 09:49 AM
Tiovinny, you seem to ignore anything that anybody posts back to you as proof that this issue is real. You totally ignored these stories I posted up for you to read on the last page. Read them and get back to us with your thoughts please. Don't cherry pick your stories, you're only fooling yourself. Chris
http://seattletimes....tefraud27m.html
http://en.wikipedia...._election,_2004
http://www.freerepub...s/1311655/posts
http://www.appeal-de...ud-franken.html
Funny, but none of those links seem to work.
I had fun on the wild goose chase though.
Don't let the facts, or lack of facts interrupt your very creative news-making though.
#68
Posted 30 August 2012 - 09:59 AM
Are you implying that black people are less capable then others of obtaining an I.D. ? This might have been an issue for some over half a centry ago in the south. I think we have moved forward since then.
Yes. Many blacks were born with midwives, or out of hospitals and do not have
birth certificates.
#69
Posted 30 August 2012 - 10:27 AM
And what percentage of the population that was born within the last fifty years does this represent?Yes. Many blacks were born with midwives, or out of hospitals and do not have
birth certificates.
#70
Posted 30 August 2012 - 10:33 AM
And what percentage of the population that was born within the last fifty years does this represent?
The .0002% that lives in the "Holla" in Virginia.
#71
Posted 30 August 2012 - 10:41 AM
Funny, but none of those links seem to work.
I had fun on the wild goose chase though.
Don't let the facts, or lack of facts interrupt your very creative news-making though.
The links might not work, but it's not too hard to find instances of voter fraud.
The one link looks like it relates to the Franken election in 2008 where 1,099 felons voted.
Google Troy, NY, Defiglio.
Or cut and paste this about some voter fraud that I hadn't heard of before.
usanews.com/debate-club/is-voter-fraud-a-real-problem/voter-fraud-is-a-proven-election-manipulation-tactic
#72
Posted 30 August 2012 - 12:07 PM
Court Blocks Texas Voter ID Law, Citing Racial Impact
Texas court ruling
“The State of Texas enacted a voter ID law that — at least to our knowledge — is the most stringent in the country,” the court wrote. “That law will almost certainly have retrogressive effect: it imposes strict, unforgiving burdens on the poor, and racial minorities in Texas are disproportionately likely to live in poverty.”
#73
Posted 30 August 2012 - 01:20 PM
The ease or difficulty in getting an ID has absolutely NOTHING to do with welfare. But I'm not going to debate this subject again. I have already made clear my opinion through a previous thread. Too lazy to do it again!I don't get that. How can it be hard to get an ID but easy to go sign up for welfare etc?
I think the gov't should issue ID's to all welfare recipients (for free to help them out), but then they'd probably whine and complain that the gov't is monitoring them or some paranoid bs like that.
#74
(MaxineR)
Posted 30 August 2012 - 02:03 PM
The ease or difficulty in getting an ID has absolutely NOTHING to do with welfare. But I'm not going to debate this subject again. I have already made clear my opinion through a previous thread. Too lazy to do it again!
Perhaps you could cut and paste your previous comments here?
I’m sure not everyone read what your feelings were on that other thread.
Or perhaps you realize that your argument lacks substance and it therefore, is a very weak argument, at it’s best?
#75
Posted 30 August 2012 - 02:13 PM
There were a number of responses and if people want to look them up, they can.Perhaps you could cut and paste your previous comments here?
I’m sure not everyone read what your feelings were on that other thread.
Or perhaps you realize that your argument lacks substance and it therefore, is a very weak argument, at it’s best?
My argument doesn't lack substance and it isn't weak. The courts have been upholding my arguments. By the way, you can disagree with me without taking shots at me.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users