Actually, my curiosity wasn't hypothetical.. My ex-husband got his first DUI with my daughter in the car, and just received a second, while on probation for the first. It is the El Dorado County DA who has filed the charges (DUI and VOP) against him. (That was the only reason I referenced El Dorado County).

Folsom Cop Arrested
#91
Posted 12 May 2009 - 07:28 AM
Actually, my curiosity wasn't hypothetical.. My ex-husband got his first DUI with my daughter in the car, and just received a second, while on probation for the first. It is the El Dorado County DA who has filed the charges (DUI and VOP) against him. (That was the only reason I referenced El Dorado County).
#92
Posted 13 May 2009 - 05:33 PM
Officers don't "charge", per se. An officer book for offenses. An officer will always book on the highest offense because the DA will generally allow the case to be plead down to a lesser charge, provided there are no extenuating circumstances.
In the case of a DUI, the mission of the officer is to eliminate the problem. I have sent folks home in a taxi because it wasn't practical due to the stacked up calls to pull myself off the street for a couple of hours to process the DUI. The only "penalty" was for the driver to figure out a way to get their keys unlocked from the inside of their locked, parked car.


#93
Posted 22 May 2009 - 04:26 PM
The policeman (off-duty) was drunk and obnoxious in the bar... breaking bottles and being loud. The owner called the cops. When the police arrived they were just going to drive him home. The owner insisted for an arrest. Policeman or not... should be arrested.
And, when you take a job as an authority position (such as a cop) you should always act respectable and responsible. Next time he shouldn't take a job where not possessing those qualities all the time wont risk his job. Too bad for him...
HILARIOUS! All of you people who assume you know what happened and are hanging this poor guy without knowing the REAL story! All I can say is karma is a bad thing and someday YOU might be in this guy's shoes. Unfortunately, you'll never HEAR the real story from the media because it would make them look even more ignorant than they already are! Those of you who criticize this guy should stop and ask yourself if what you've HEARD and SEEN on the media is true? Would someone with no previous history and a good rep in the community seriously risk his job and life by having a bar brawl and driving drunk? All I can say is there is so much more to this story and the media painted just the picture they wanted, and those of you with no conscious and no brain to think for yourselves have been sucked in by the media...once again! Before you talk any more crap, get the facts. And if you can't, then keep your thoughts to yourself. From someone with the accurate facts, you're all looking pretty clueless!
#94
Posted 22 May 2009 - 05:16 PM
Now this is getting interesting. I know the owner, so I'd like to hear the 'real' story. Can you give us the 'real' side as you seem to know it?
#95
Posted 22 May 2009 - 05:20 PM
What are the facts? Why don't you contribute to the discussion with what you know rather than saying everyone's clueless?
BTW, welcome to the forum.
#96
(The Dude)
Posted 22 May 2009 - 06:10 PM
... and the real facts are.. ???? drop the drama and spit it out already if you have some evidence that proves everyone was wrong about him and the situation as it was reported by numerous sources including the PD
#97
Posted 22 May 2009 - 09:15 PM
Yet another person who knows all the facts...everytime there is an incident involving the Folsom Police, there is the 'cover up', so the public doesn't know 'all the facts'. Well, guess what. If the FPD would tell people the truth, then we would have the facts, but that never happens, unfortunately.
#98
Posted 23 May 2009 - 07:02 AM
Back here in the East, he would have been fired on the spot.
#99
Posted 23 May 2009 - 08:19 AM
Back here in the East, he would have been fired on the spot.
If you're from the "east," what the heck are you doing on the discussion board for a tiny little suburban town in Northern California?
Also, what you're describing sounds awful, so the guy just gets fired? Without an investigation? Without witnesses or anything? Without any sort of truth?
Where are you from? China?
#100
Posted 23 May 2009 - 08:49 AM
well only part so, cause the officer was not set totally free by his brothers.
now is the time for some real EDF A game
#101
Posted 23 May 2009 - 05:19 PM
Every so often I stick my nose in and see what my namesake town is up to.
I've been in Folsom, California and it's not so small.
#102
Posted 24 May 2009 - 08:34 AM
#103
Posted 24 May 2009 - 09:18 AM
What you are hearing is a version of the incident from one side.
All the speculation and craptalking doesn't change the BAC level.
Maybe the FPD, should recuse themselves and turn this over to another jurisdiction?
#104
Posted 02 September 2009 - 03:02 PM
There is a part of me that is sad that the officer has lost his job, but understand the City doesn't have much leeway in making this choice.
Just a sad story all the way around.
#105
Posted 02 September 2009 - 03:48 PM
So the Telegraph article doesn't have any story other than the cop assaulted someone and tried to drive. What are the other facts and the real story that would explain why he shouldn't be fired and charged?
I'm not judging him but some people have said (back in May) that they know the real story but they wont post it.
It looks like it wasn't anything that could be solved with anger and alcohol counseling. That part is sad. It would have been great if he could have got some counseling and returned to the job and his life a better man and officer.
So come on if anyone knows something share it...What is the "real" story?
Why did you tell everyone on here they were wrong?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users