QUOTE(CostcoLover @ Sep 2 2005, 01:16 PM)
How long is that article? Can you paste some of it here? I really would rather not register with Sac Bee and for some reason bugmenot is not working for me.
Are there maps? Do they show the potential flood area zones? Do they discuss what the potential threat would come from, etc. ? Any statistical data in the article?

Hurricane Katrina seems far removed from Sacramento, but levee failures in New Orleans, one day after the storm, are a chilling reminder that the two cities have a lot in common.
At least two levees protecting historic New Orleans failed Tuesday morning, weakened by Katrina's storm surge. The city flooded up to 20 feet deep in places, submerging the fabled French Quarter, forcing evacuation of hospitals, and creating a nightmare of water contamination and broken utilities.
The consequences, in economic and human terms, are impossible to measure.
But one fact bears mentioning: New Orleans had better flood protection than Sacramento, and still it was overwhelmed.
"Clearly this is a wake-up call," said Sacramento Mayor Heather Fargo, "not only to get flood insurance, but to continue to work hard to strengthen our levees and improve flood control."
Levees are the first line of flood defense for both New Orleans and Sacramento, which are similar in population.
Unlike Sacramento, New Orleans lies next to the ocean and below sea level. And California doesn't get hurricanes.
There are times, however, when much of Sacramento lies below the level of the American and Sacramento rivers at flood stage, straining our vital levees. And, as in New Orleans, rushing water can have a fatal scouring effect on Sacramento levees.
"In a lot of ways, we see New Orleans as a sister city," said Stein Buer, executive director of the Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency. "We feel deeply the tragedy that's unfolding."
New Orleans was said to enjoy 250-year flood protection, meaning the city faced a 1-in-250 chance of flooding in any given year. Central Sacramento, in comparison, is rated to withstand only a 100-year flood event.
Sacramento's risk of flooding, in short, is the greatest of any major American city, according to SAFCA.
"One of these days, we might get a huge storm," said Rep. Doris Matsui, D-Sacramento. "We have to take steps to ensure something like this doesn't happen to a community like Sacramento."
Sacramento narrowly dodged that bullet in two recent wet years, 1986 and 1997. As a result, local officials developed an ambitious plan, originally estimated to cost about $700 million, to improve flood protection to a one-in-213 standard.
The project includes modifications to Folsom Dam and many miles of levee improvements along the Sacramento and American rivers.
Much of the project remains unfunded, and recent setbacks have slowed progress.
Bids for a key project to improve Folsom Dam's release capacity came in up to three times higher than the $215 million estimate. As a result, it could now be up to three more years before full construction begins.