
The Folsom City Library
#106
Posted 04 March 2004 - 11:53 PM
a) I have the utmost respect for veterans of this country. They all risked it all for this country, and we owe our country's freedom to each and every one of them. I don't think they are a bunch of "kooks".
b) The library is long overdue. This thing has gone through I don't know how many publis hearings, where were you 2 years ago owhen they were discussing the options available.
c) The ballfield is old, neglected, and in a state of disrepair. Plenty of newer facilities can now take its place. I look at it like Candlestick Park. It was great in its prime and served many good years, but it eventually got too old. Pac Bell Park is now the jewel of San Francisco. We're not talking about some historical ballpark Willie Mays played in at the softball field... there are plaenty of new facilities now that can take its place. We don't have a softball field shortage in Folsom.
d) Farley's relatives are OK with it. Why does their voice not count?
e) A much better memorial will be put in place (and I believe the rock will still stay) with a flag garden and possibly a fountain. My grandkids will certainly appreciate that more than a rock. If JFK's memorial can be upgraded, certainly Mr. Farley's can.
f) What I do see is a bunch of old codgers unwilling to change and causing this mess, and I really think it's all out of spite too. Just because they may be veterans doesn't give them special treatment in my book... there are plenty of veterans who are actively in support of the new library. I believe the naysayers are in the minority though, as is evident with the difficulty they are having of getting the required 6000 votes.
g) There are plenty of veterans currently coming up with a solution to this. Mr. Farley will not be forgotten.
I must say...
If you're not part of the solution, you must be part of the problem!!!
Build this library. It will be a beautiful addition to Folsom. I personally think both the library and the garden will be wonderful additions to this community. Certainly better than a beat up softball field and a rock. I simply don't think the current memorial is a tribute to our fine veterans of Folsom.
Ben Stein
#107
Posted 05 March 2004 - 06:56 AM
Who's fault is it that the ballfield was not kept up?
Maybe the city or parks and rec?????
If the old ballpark was in perfect condition and had been kept up would they have been to quick to put the new library there???
Just a couple of questions.
Yes, I do support a new Library...
#108
Posted 05 March 2004 - 11:00 AM
I think Borders is behind all this controversy. Think of it - if there is a bigger library, then more people will be checking books out and not buying them from the local bookstore, Borders. They are using the Lions and veterans as a smoke screen.
I say follow the money trail!
[/conspiracy mode on]
#109
Posted 05 March 2004 - 01:07 PM
Another major point: This was a not a field that was built to todays standards. It was thrown together, I believe, by volunteers. So it was never as good a field as the new ones are.
#110
Posted 05 March 2004 - 03:33 PM
I have seen a lot of bad ballfields in my time and most of them can be fixed up and then be in great condition.
In the Navy I pitched in a fastpitch league and played on some fields that were subpar but it was a ball field and we played.
#111
Posted 05 March 2004 - 04:05 PM
To spend the money on that field would drop others off the list, and frankly, no one has come forward and said "we really like that field so please fix it" until now.
And it is not just plowing the dirt. Anytime the city undertakes such an action they would also be, most likely, required to fix the fencing and dugouts and before you know it, it'll cost big bucks.
My brother used to live in Navy housing and I loved the fields and tot lot play equipment everywhere. Outside of the military we just can't do it cheaply enough with all the myriad requirements that it be built with union level wages, high safety standards, handicapped accessibilty, etc.
If you wanna know why the list of needs is so long, look at Angelo Tsakapolous and his bank account. He took the country bumpkins in charge here for a ride and we are all paying the price. If Kipp and company did some homework they would have found that they needed to charge developers park fees, school fees, etc. He has an extra $50,000,00 or so that would have helped us a lot.
#112
Posted 05 March 2004 - 04:10 PM
#113
Posted 05 March 2004 - 04:12 PM
There was no sign at Catlin Park south and after bringing it to the attention of the city of folsom, about two years ago, they finally got one installed there last month.
#114
Posted 06 March 2004 - 11:47 AM
The City failing to properly take care of that park and allow it to fall into disprepare and/or poor condition, will appear to make its position more appealing to those, in this situation, who would agree with the City that the library should go there. That entire park is the largest open space park in this City and it should be preserved. Contrary to popular belief, there is still land in this City available to build upon. Whomever thinks that building the library in the City Park is going to be the least expensive, better think again. This City, and for that matter, no governmental entity does anything on a cost saving scale. It will cost the same to put the library up no matter where it's placed.
Just remember, those of us against putting the library on Farely field want a library, but we want it put anywhere else. One thing that is interesting is that those opposed to the library being built in the City park are passionately opposed to it for good reason. However, those that are siding with the City to put the library in the park don't really have an equally passionate reason for wanting the library placed there. There is imbalance here.
#115
Posted 06 March 2004 - 05:58 PM
Now you don't really believe there is a conspiracy at the city to let the field go, do you? This idea to put the library there and thereby save the firehouse for other uses is recent. The Farley field has been on a long, slow decent for far longer.
The city absolutely does do a lot of things with cost savings in mind. It benefits them to do so. But maybe you are one of those people who see a conspiracy in everything and listen for the black helicopter spying on you at night. So I won't argue that anymore.
Another location would absolutely cost more because then we would have to pay for the land. The city does own some other land but it is mostly spoken for or unsuitable for a library.
Finally, I understand your argument regarding passion. My question would be is the passion really about the location? Or is it really about veterans and all they have done not being appreciated enough? That is understandable. That is why I wonder if the passion isn't merely misplaced.
The reasoning on the other side isn't passion, unless you can consider it passionate that we build a library in a central location, near city hall, on city land, with an eye for efficient use of all of the taxpayers dollars, not just the veterans tax dollars.
#116
Posted 07 March 2004 - 09:44 AM
Folsom is becoming a bigger city and there is room to spread out - to say that there is no land available to the City without a cost is a joke - and u need to investigate your facts on this - or maybe it is because Mr.Mikolos made some sort of profit off those sites already - interesting that a man that is a mortgage broker does not have an interest with the developers - now let's see - let's put the library on an existing spot and not a spot the developers want to put houses or shopping centers
do u think this is all ridiculous - so do I as well as your arguments
U apparently have never felt passionatley about anything -
yesterday I met some Little League parents especially the Dad's - they are pastionate - they are pasionate about there children learning to play ball and not having to drive all over town to do it
and all these Dad's and Kids were at Farley field - that field that everyone claims is not used.
It is used - living near it I see that - there is music in the park, there is the little league opening day - which is a long standing tradition ....
oh that is alright it is ok to break tradition
your kind of appathetic bull....makes me sick
#117
Posted 07 March 2004 - 10:47 AM
Waterbaby, you gotta make up your mind. You say that there is room to spread out for the library in one sentence. Then you say dads don't want to drive all over town to have their kids play little league. Which is it?
I think that sentence shows your bias. You see, people live outside of your neighborhood. So most people have to drive to different fields anyway. I doubt your team is just from the Wales area.
P.S. You spelled passionately three different ways, and none of them is right.
#118
Posted 07 March 2004 - 10:54 AM
What is their motive? Do they hate Mr. Farley? Softball? Do they want to anger the citizens? Cause more traffic? Offend the veterans and their families? Have a showdown with the Lions club?
Why? Why? Why?
Those behind the recall aren't saying the council made a mistake, they are saying they 'rammed the decision down our throats', and pushed the matter off untill it was too late in the evening for the elderly to protest, hid their agenda, didn't consider other sites, and discouraged public comment, and ignored the pleas of others.
Why? Why would they do this?
Is there buried treasure under that field that they can only get at under the guise of construction?
I don't mean to make light of this situation, but I haven't heard motive.
Somebody 'splain it to me.
Steve Heard
Folsom Real Estate Specialist
EXP Realty
BRE#01368503
Owner - MyFolsom.com
916 718 9577
#119
Posted 07 March 2004 - 11:34 AM
spread out refers to placing the libarary in another location
next saturday try the park - and see what field is what!
The memorial is in the park - to all veterans
the Farley field is dedicated to one veteran on lost his life in Vietnam
sorry I don't spell to your standards - and that is your only point - must mean we have merit
#120
Posted 07 March 2004 - 02:55 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users