219 replies to this topic

[joannneschmoe]

A suppression hearing would be a defense motion to disallow some evidence for some technical reason; i.e. illegal search. It is one of many possible preliminary hearings. The courts continue hearings all of the time for hundreds of different reasons. Even when they get to the hearing in April, it will only resolve the matter of whether a certain piece of evidence can be used at a trial.

So what does this stuff mean? Do you really think it will go on forever? I looked up what the charges stood for and they mean felony drugs...blonde74 sent me a link to this site that say his court dates. Here is the list:

Filing Charges:
Count Charge Severity
C001 HS 11377(A) FEL

Type Code Description
Severity FEL Felony


Show/Hide Code Description

Hearing Future:
Date Time Department Location Reason
04/17/2007 8:45 AM Department 04 Downtown Courthouse - 720 Ninth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 TRIAL
04/13/2007 1:30 PM Department 08 Downtown Courthouse - 720 Ninth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 TRC

CodeType DomainCode Description
Reason TRC TRIAL READINESS CONFERENCE
Reason TRIAL TRIAL


Show/Hide Code Description

Hearing History:
Date Time Department Reason Outcome
02/09/2007 9:00 AM Department 27 FP/MUNI HTA
02/09/2007 9:00 AM Department 27 MOT1538.5 OTHER
02/09/2007 8:30 AM Department 04 MOT/SUP CONT
01/18/2007 8:30 AM Department 08 FP CONT
01/02/2007 8:30 AM Department 08 FP CONT
12/19/2006 8:30 AM Department 08 FP CONT
12/12/2006 8:30 AM Department 08 FP CONT
12/04/2006 8:30 AM Department 08 BAIL BOND FORFEIT
12/04/2006 8:30 AM Department 08 FP FTA
11/27/2006 8:30 AM Department 08 FP CONT
11/13/2006 10:30 AM Department 08 ARRAIGN ARRAIGNFEL
11/13/2006 10:30 AM Department 08 COUNSEL RET


Type Code Description
Reason ARRAIGN ARRAIGNMENT
Reason BAIL BOND BAIL BOND INFORMATION
Reason COUNSEL COUNSEL INFORMATION
Reason FP FURTHER PROCEEDINGS
Reason FP/MUNI FURTHER PROCEEDINGS, MUNICIPAL
Reason MOT/SUP MOTION TO SUPPRESS (1538.5 PC)
Reason MOT1538.5 DEFT MOT PUR 1538.5
Outcome ARRAIGNFEL ARR, COPY DEL, INF RTS, ADVISE RE: ATTY FEES/987.8PC
Outcome CONT CONTINUED
Outcome FORFEIT BAIL FORFEITED
Outcome FTA FAILED TO APPEAR
Outcome HTA HELD TO ANSWER
Outcome OTHER OTHER
Outcome RET RETAINED COUNSEL

Show/Hide Code Description
Charge Dispositions:


- no charge disposition data found
Show/Hide Code Description
Sentence Summary:




Maybe we should all show up.....then again if they just continue it....then he could have his buddies retaliate.

[blonde74]

So what does this stuff mean? Do you really think it will go on forever? I looked up what the charges stood for and they mean felony drugs...blonde74 sent me a link to this site that say his court dates. Here is the list:

Filing Charges:
Count Charge Severity
C001 HS 11377(A) FEL

Type Code Description
Severity FEL Felony


Show/Hide Code Description

Hearing Future:
Date Time Department Location Reason
04/17/2007 8:45 AM Department 04 Downtown Courthouse - 720 Ninth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 TRIAL
04/13/2007 1:30 PM Department 08 Downtown Courthouse - 720 Ninth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 TRC

CodeType DomainCode Description
Reason TRC TRIAL READINESS CONFERENCE
Reason TRIAL TRIAL


Show/Hide Code Description

Hearing History:
Date Time Department Reason Outcome
02/09/2007 9:00 AM Department 27 FP/MUNI HTA
02/09/2007 9:00 AM Department 27 MOT1538.5 OTHER
02/09/2007 8:30 AM Department 04 MOT/SUP CONT
01/18/2007 8:30 AM Department 08 FP CONT
01/02/2007 8:30 AM Department 08 FP CONT
12/19/2006 8:30 AM Department 08 FP CONT
12/12/2006 8:30 AM Department 08 FP CONT
12/04/2006 8:30 AM Department 08 BAIL BOND FORFEIT
12/04/2006 8:30 AM Department 08 FP FTA
11/27/2006 8:30 AM Department 08 FP CONT
11/13/2006 10:30 AM Department 08 ARRAIGN ARRAIGNFEL
11/13/2006 10:30 AM Department 08 COUNSEL RET


Type Code Description
Reason ARRAIGN ARRAIGNMENT
Reason BAIL BOND BAIL BOND INFORMATION
Reason COUNSEL COUNSEL INFORMATION
Reason FP FURTHER PROCEEDINGS
Reason FP/MUNI FURTHER PROCEEDINGS, MUNICIPAL
Reason MOT/SUP MOTION TO SUPPRESS (1538.5 PC)
Reason MOT1538.5 DEFT MOT PUR 1538.5
Outcome ARRAIGNFEL ARR, COPY DEL, INF RTS, ADVISE RE: ATTY FEES/987.8PC
Outcome CONT CONTINUED
Outcome FORFEIT BAIL FORFEITED
Outcome FTA FAILED TO APPEAR
Outcome HTA HELD TO ANSWER
Outcome OTHER OTHER
Outcome RET RETAINED COUNSEL

Show/Hide Code Description
Charge Dispositions:


- no charge disposition data found
Show/Hide Code Description
Sentence Summary:
Maybe we should all show up.....then again if they just continue it....then he could have his buddies retaliate.

I forgot to check the website...I kept looking and they hadn't updated it almost a week after the supression hearing stuff. I kept looking in the Sac Bee, but for some reason an article that was important enough to be on the front page wasn't important enough for a follow up....

[tessieca]

It's the defendant who has the right to a speedy trial, so if his counsel finds ways to keep continuing it it could go on for awhile. This guy has been up on felony charges before. He has plead to misdemeanor. Pleas are far more common than following through to conviction. Delays by the defense make a plea agreement more likely (wear down the overworked prosecution).

[blonde74]

It's the defendant who has the right to a speedy trial, so if his counsel finds ways to keep continuing it it could go on for awhile. This guy has been up on felony charges before. He has plead to misdemeanor. Pleas are far more common than following through to conviction. Delays by the defense make a plea agreement more likely (wear down the overworked prosecution).

Sac Bee printed this letter today:


Why 'Mansion' on Page 1?

Re "The Mansion," Feb. 7: I have never felt particularly compelled to write to The Bee until I read this article. As a law enforcement officer, I hold no fondness for illegal drug users or the other inappropriate activities described in your report. I also have the utmost sympathy for any person who lives next to disruptive neighbors.

As a person who has seen a multitude of newsworthy events, it is astonishing to me that "The Mansion" is found by you to merit front-page attention. Your comments, including the naming of a divorced wife and the identification of a local commercial business, showed enormously poor judgment. It is also appalling that you find it appropriate to disclose personal medical information in your article.

This journalism and commentary are more worthy of the National Enquirer than The Bee.

- Kelly Clark, Folsom

[joannneschmoe]

Sac Bee printed this letter today:
Why 'Mansion' on Page 1?

Re "The Mansion," Feb. 7: I have never felt particularly compelled to write to The Bee until I read this article. As a law enforcement officer, I hold no fondness for illegal drug users or the other inappropriate activities described in your report. I also have the utmost sympathy for any person who lives next to disruptive neighbors.

As a person who has seen a multitude of newsworthy events, it is astonishing to me that "The Mansion" is found by you to merit front-page attention. Your comments, including the naming of a divorced wife and the identification of a local commercial business, showed enormously poor judgment. It is also appalling that you find it appropriate to disclose personal medical information in your article.

This journalism and commentary are more worthy of the National Enquirer than The Bee.

- Kelly Clark, Folsom

Finally!

[blonde74]

So the news around the neighborhood today is that mr larrick has had a bunch of stuff stolen from him in the past three days and his Roy's Boy's have pored bleach and spray painted the whole mansion. Including holes in the walls, broken marbel and mirrors....is the end near?

[joannneschmoe]

So the news around the neighborhood today is that mr larrick has had a bunch of stuff stolen from him in the past three days and his Roy's Boy's have pored bleach and spray painted the whole mansion. Including holes in the walls, broken marbel and mirrors....is the end near?

Sorry I haven't got a clue. I looked at the police log on-line but they haven't updated it since the 15th of february. Maybe the have been to busy at Larrick's house. We are all praying for ya.

[Terry]

Sorry I haven't got a clue. I looked at the police log on-line but they haven't updated it since the 15th of february. Maybe the have been to busy at Larrick's house. We are all praying for ya.

Sounds llike Roy's boys are sabotaging his efforts to sell the mansion.

[realtor]

Just a question...was there any sign of drug manufacturing going on there? Not that anyone here would have first hand knowledge but was it stated anywhere?

[joannneschmoe]

Just a question...was there any sign of drug manufacturing going on there? Not that anyone here would have first hand knowledge but was it stated anywhere?

From all of the stuff that I've read, I haven't seen anything about them making drugs. But there isn't a list anywhere on what they have removed from the house. The Bee article said there was a full syring...isn't making drugs a dangerious biohazzard? Maybe I watch too much tv.

[realtor]

From all of the stuff that I've read, I haven't seen anything about them making drugs. But there isn't a list anywhere on what they have removed from the house. The Bee article said there was a full syring...isn't making drugs a dangerious biohazzard? Maybe I watch too much tv.

That was exactly where I was going with this question. IF it is deemed a "meth" lab then the clean up is pricy and will definintely take a bit more than the "as-is" buyer to get that place sold.
It sure will be interesting to see how this shakes out...

[joannneschmoe]

That was exactly where I was going with this question. IF it is deemed a "meth" lab then the clean up is pricy and will definintely take a bit more than the "as-is" buyer to get that place sold.
It sure will be interesting to see how this shakes out...

Don't the police test air chemicals or whatever to determine if it is a biohazzard? I mean if they are in there anyway looking for drugs....don't they automatically look for evidence of "cooking"? It seems like a natural usful step. Does anyone know?

[ESP Guy]

Don't the police test air chemicals or whatever to determine if it is a biohazzard? I mean if they are in there anyway looking for drugs....don't they automatically look for evidence of "cooking"? It seems like a natural usful step. Does anyone know?

They wouldnt test the air unless there were signs of creation (common ingredients in bulk quanitities). Im sure they searched the home for anything (including drug making facilities), like I said, its very obvious when stuff is being made, very obvious.

[joannneschmoe]

They wouldnt test the air unless there were signs of creation (common ingredients in bulk quanitities). Im sure they searched the home for anything (including drug making facilities), like I said, its very obvious when stuff is being made, very obvious.

That's so creepy...it gives me chills. Can you imagine what would happen in that neighborhood if they are cooking the stuff? It's supposed to be really flamable and unstable. Are the other houses far enough away to be safe?

[ESP Guy]

That's so creepy...it gives me chills. Can you imagine what would happen in that neighborhood if they are cooking the stuff? It's supposed to be really flamable and unstable. Are the other houses far enough away to be safe?

its extemely combustable... thats how most methlabs are found... the explosion!

in that house though, there wouldnt be anything more than some windows blown out at most. most instances seen have been in garages, where the blast may have knocked the door off the guide, but then sets the place on fire, but doesnt level even those thin walls.