Jump to content






Photo
- - - - -

Sutter Street Makeover


  • Please log in to reply
148 replies to this topic

Poll: Sutter Street Makeover (90 member(s) have cast votes)

How would you like Sutter Street changed?

  1. Remove medians, covered awnings, and extend sidewalks (28 votes [31.11%])

    Percentage of vote: 31.11%

  2. Re-do/repair medians, repair covered awnings (40 votes [44.44%])

    Percentage of vote: 44.44%

  3. Keep medians, lose coverings (2 votes [2.22%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.22%

  4. Keep coverings, lose medians (5 votes [5.56%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.56%

  5. Do nothing (15 votes [16.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.67%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#121 4thgenFolsomite

4thgenFolsomite

    Hopeless Addict

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,979 posts

Posted 28 October 2007 - 08:45 AM

QUOTE(Redone @ Oct 28 2007, 09:03 AM) View Post
"MANY OF THE BUILDING OWNERS ARE NOT HAPPY WITH IT."

This is not true, more like it than don't.



I know there was never a vote on it, but I can absolutely guarantee you that the owners of at least 12 of the buildings are NOT in favor of it.
Knowing the past helps deciphering the future.

#122 newsblaze

newsblaze

    All Star

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 441 posts
  • Location:folsom Historic District
  • Interests:News, computers, the garden, HFRA, bagpipes, Folsom.

Posted 28 October 2007 - 12:44 PM

>> WHY CHOOSE ONLY ADVOCATES FOR THE NEW PLAN

Sorry, I didn't mean it to be that way. Here's the point I was trying to make.
1. Jeff talked about the whole process and invited everyone to take part, making the point that

QUOTE
We found nearly universal agreement on two things.
First, the special character of the historic district helps define Folsom as something more than a suburb of Sacramento. And Sutter Street is the most significant defining element of that special character.

2. Candy Miller was against it in the beginning, and if a 100% historic advocate can change her mind, what does that say about the idea? She says the plan is not to do away with the shed roof - it can be replaced (I'd like to see that too)

3. Richard Gray was there when the trees were put in - he has a story to show why those trees are in trouble.

4. Ellen Hester says the museum has all the research information

I should have made it clear I was talking about educating people to what is and what was. - those four people provided facts that anyone can use.

I didn't mention Courtney Puffer, at Pacific Western Traders. A few weeks ago, Courtney was 100% against this but he is now on the Design Committee. I bet he still has concerns, but he is participating and he isn't going to let this become Broadstone 2. His family has been in this area for 100 years .

>>WHY NOT REPLANT MATURE TREES
Exactly - get involved and put your point across

>>OPPORTUNITY TO REPLACE THE MEDIANS IN A STRONGER AND MORE ATTRACTIVE ARRANGEMENT.
Ditto - Community involvement is requested - don't forget the vulnerability of the buildings.

>>NO DOUBT SOME THOSE OVERHANGS NEED TO BE REPAIRED/REPLACED. HOWEVER, IF ITS UP TO THE PROPERTY OWNER TO REPLACE THE AWNING BUILDING BY BUILDING (WHICH IS NOT HISTORICALLY HOW THE AWNINGS WERE CONSTRUCTED ON THE STREET FOR THE MOST PART) THEN ITS LIKELY ITS GOING TO HAVE A HODGE PODGE FEEL WITH A FAUX WESTERN FEEL. PART OF THE CHARM NOW IS THE UNIFIED COMMUNAL FEELING OF THE OVERHANG.
Hodge Podge? - check your photos of early Folsom - conformity as well as history? Remember that the HDC has to approve them. I don't know why the City decided to put up the shed roof on the buildings. "Unified Communal feeling of the overhang" - That is what hides the charming historic architecture, function over form and joins multiple buildings together. The new building at Sutter and Wool will be one big building that will look like four separate buildings. in the 700 block we have four buildings tied together as one. Wouldn't it be good to change that?

>>IF THE TREES ARE MOVED 20 FEET CLOSER TO THE BUILDINGS, THEY WILL OBSCURE THOSE HISTORIC FACADES.
Excellent point, please participate and make those points.

>> EXPAND THEIR TABLE SPACE ON THE STREET...DOESN'T BENEFIT THE MAJORITY OF THE STORES
When people have time to sit and wait for a drink or meal will they look in windows or walk into stores. When there is a draw like multiple outside cafes, I think it will bring a lot more people into the street. When the street is full of antique shops, jewelry shops etc, what is there that keeps a large number of people coming down here? I would think - and I'm no expert - that outdoor cafes would make the 700 block more vibrant.

>>I DONT THINK WE SHOULD BE SO CAVALIER ABOUT CHANGING THE VERY STRUCTURE OF IT.
Please participate and make the point. Maybe its better to let the Folsom Station area have all of the outside dining and bring people in and leave the 700 block with the existing layout after all the necessary work gets done.

>>HERE IS A QUESTION THAT HASN'T COME UP. DO THE NEW AWNINGS EXTEND OVER THE ENTIRE 20 FEET OF THE NEW WIDENED SIDEWALK?
Excellent points

>>MANY OF THE SHED ROOFS NEED REPAIR
Great points - but most of the shed roofs don't need repair - they are way beyond that - they need to be removed, get the facade fixed and then replaced and done in the right way, it can look original, if you get the right architect and the right materials and finish.

>>NEW MIX OF STORES... PROPONENTS ARE HOPING THIS FORCES SOME PEOPLE OUT.
If you were interested in buying a property there, you can't get a bank loan - too risky for most banks. You need cach - got a couple of million handy? I think some owners want to get out but its very difficult. Tenant mix is not the same as owner mix. Talking about tenant mix conjures up the idea of pushing businesses out, but consider this - what if four businesses close and a realtor, a law firm, a mortgage company and Starbucks want to set up there - what good is that going to do the street? The FHDA (merchants Association) is trying to help get these things together, to help the whole district. Disclosure - I am the FHDA Secretary.

>>IF THE 600, 800, AND 900 BLOCKS HAVE WIDENED SIDEWALKS, HOW COULD THE 700 BLOCK BE LEFT ALONE WITHOUT IT LOOKING ODD? THIS PLAN SHOULD BE COHESIVE.
They're all different now. How to get cohesive but not cookie-cutter?

>>IF WE DON'T START WITH A COHESIVE PLAN
This is exactly what is starting right now, please be a part of it. You have a lot of good ideas and you've obviously seen other places where it worked or didn't work.

I was in Golden, Colorado a couple of weeks ago. I'm doing a short story on that. They didn't have a lot of historic buildings but they have a nice feel - but its definitely not historic, even though they have a historic area. I was also in Boulder, Colorado - also very nice - and they have a car-free mall, but they also have a University with thousands of students all around it. That is what I call vibrant.

This process is not going to be easy and its not going to be done on the cheap. Its important we get it right. I live in the HD, just up the hill and I'm in the commercial area every day. I want it to be historic and vibrant and I want everyone to be successful. Don't forget, it is the merchants and the property owners who are putting their money where their mouths are, not us. Its a lot easier for us all to want to tell them what to do - we have only emotional equity in it. I guarantee you, the merchants want this to be historic - its the whole point of being here and that is the draw that brings people here, but there aren't enough people yet. The disruption may force some merchants out - they know it is risky - Stand in the merchants' shoes and think about what you would want.

I have a question for everyone on this board - and anyone not on it. If I ask you, in the next two years to help make the HD successful by spending some time down here, taking part in events, eating in restaurants, visiting shops, recommending the area to your friends and relatives, would you do it? What would it take for you to say yes? What will I do for you? I don't know yet, but I'll work something out.

Alan.
FolsomLocalNews.com

Alan Gray
Read Folsom news at
http://folsomlocalnews.com
Support Our Troops, Read Their Stories
at http://newsblaze.com

#123 mylo

mylo

    Mmm.. Tomato

  • Moderator
  • 16,763 posts
  • Location:Folsom

Posted 28 October 2007 - 03:41 PM

QUOTE(4thgenFolsomite @ Oct 28 2007, 09:45 AM) View Post
I know there was never a vote on it, but I can absolutely guarantee you that the owners of at least 12 of the buildings are NOT in favor of it.

3 building owners spoke at city council in favor of it. I've talked to others who are also very excited.
"Ah, yes, those Gucci extremists and their Prada jihad!" --ducky

#124 4thgenFolsomite

4thgenFolsomite

    Hopeless Addict

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,979 posts

Posted 28 October 2007 - 05:22 PM

QUOTE(newsblaze @ Oct 28 2007, 01:44 PM) View Post
>> WHY CHOOSE ONLY ADVOCATES FOR THE NEW PLAN

Sorry, I didn't mean it to be that way. Here's the point I was trying to make.
1. Jeff talked about the whole process and invited everyone to take part, making the point that
2. Candy Miller was against it in the beginning, and if a 100% historic advocate can change her mind, what does that say about the idea? She says the plan is not to do away with the shed roof - it can be replaced (I'd like to see that too)

3. Richard Gray was there when the trees were put in - he has a story to show why those trees are in trouble.

4. Ellen Hester says the museum has all the research information

I should have made it clear I was talking about educating people to what is and what was. - those four people provided facts that anyone can use.

I didn't mention Courtney Puffer, at Pacific Western Traders. A few weeks ago, Courtney was 100% against this but he is now on the Design Committee. I bet he still has concerns, but he is participating and he isn't going to let this become Broadstone 2. His family has been in this area for 100 years .

>>WHY NOT REPLANT MATURE TREES
Exactly - get involved and put your point across

>>OPPORTUNITY TO REPLACE THE MEDIANS IN A STRONGER AND MORE ATTRACTIVE ARRANGEMENT.
Ditto - Community involvement is requested - don't forget the vulnerability of the buildings.

>>NO DOUBT SOME THOSE OVERHANGS NEED TO BE REPAIRED/REPLACED. HOWEVER, IF ITS UP TO THE PROPERTY OWNER TO REPLACE THE AWNING BUILDING BY BUILDING (WHICH IS NOT HISTORICALLY HOW THE AWNINGS WERE CONSTRUCTED ON THE STREET FOR THE MOST PART) THEN ITS LIKELY ITS GOING TO HAVE A HODGE PODGE FEEL WITH A FAUX WESTERN FEEL. PART OF THE CHARM NOW IS THE UNIFIED COMMUNAL FEELING OF THE OVERHANG.
Hodge Podge? - check your photos of early Folsom - conformity as well as history? Remember that the HDC has to approve them. I don't know why the City decided to put up the shed roof on the buildings. "Unified Communal feeling of the overhang" - That is what hides the charming historic architecture, function over form and joins multiple buildings together. The new building at Sutter and Wool will be one big building that will look like four separate buildings. in the 700 block we have four buildings tied together as one. Wouldn't it be good to change that?

>>IF THE TREES ARE MOVED 20 FEET CLOSER TO THE BUILDINGS, THEY WILL OBSCURE THOSE HISTORIC FACADES.
Excellent point, please participate and make those points.

>> EXPAND THEIR TABLE SPACE ON THE STREET...DOESN'T BENEFIT THE MAJORITY OF THE STORES
When people have time to sit and wait for a drink or meal will they look in windows or walk into stores. When there is a draw like multiple outside cafes, I think it will bring a lot more people into the street. When the street is full of antique shops, jewelry shops etc, what is there that keeps a large number of people coming down here? I would think - and I'm no expert - that outdoor cafes would make the 700 block more vibrant.

>>I DONT THINK WE SHOULD BE SO CAVALIER ABOUT CHANGING THE VERY STRUCTURE OF IT.
Please participate and make the point. Maybe its better to let the Folsom Station area have all of the outside dining and bring people in and leave the 700 block with the existing layout after all the necessary work gets done.

>>HERE IS A QUESTION THAT HASN'T COME UP. DO THE NEW AWNINGS EXTEND OVER THE ENTIRE 20 FEET OF THE NEW WIDENED SIDEWALK?
Excellent points

>>MANY OF THE SHED ROOFS NEED REPAIR
Great points - but most of the shed roofs don't need repair - they are way beyond that - they need to be removed, get the facade fixed and then replaced and done in the right way, it can look original, if you get the right architect and the right materials and finish.

>>NEW MIX OF STORES... PROPONENTS ARE HOPING THIS FORCES SOME PEOPLE OUT.
If you were interested in buying a property there, you can't get a bank loan - too risky for most banks. You need cach - got a couple of million handy? I think some owners want to get out but its very difficult. Tenant mix is not the same as owner mix. Talking about tenant mix conjures up the idea of pushing businesses out, but consider this - what if four businesses close and a realtor, a law firm, a mortgage company and Starbucks want to set up there - what good is that going to do the street? The FHDA (merchants Association) is trying to help get these things together, to help the whole district. Disclosure - I am the FHDA Secretary.

>>IF THE 600, 800, AND 900 BLOCKS HAVE WIDENED SIDEWALKS, HOW COULD THE 700 BLOCK BE LEFT ALONE WITHOUT IT LOOKING ODD? THIS PLAN SHOULD BE COHESIVE.
They're all different now. How to get cohesive but not cookie-cutter?

>>IF WE DON'T START WITH A COHESIVE PLAN
This is exactly what is starting right now, please be a part of it. You have a lot of good ideas and you've obviously seen other places where it worked or didn't work.

I was in Golden, Colorado a couple of weeks ago. I'm doing a short story on that. They didn't have a lot of historic buildings but they have a nice feel - but its definitely not historic, even though they have a historic area. I was also in Boulder, Colorado - also very nice - and they have a car-free mall, but they also have a University with thousands of students all around it. That is what I call vibrant.

This process is not going to be easy and its not going to be done on the cheap. Its important we get it right. I live in the HD, just up the hill and I'm in the commercial area every day. I want it to be historic and vibrant and I want everyone to be successful. Don't forget, it is the merchants and the property owners who are putting their money where their mouths are, not us. Its a lot easier for us all to want to tell them what to do - we have only emotional equity in it. I guarantee you, the merchants want this to be historic - its the whole point of being here and that is the draw that brings people here, but there aren't enough people yet. The disruption may force some merchants out - they know it is risky - Stand in the merchants' shoes and think about what you would want.

I have a question for everyone on this board - and anyone not on it. If I ask you, in the next two years to help make the HD successful by spending some time down here, taking part in events, eating in restaurants, visiting shops, recommending the area to your friends and relatives, would you do it? What would it take for you to say yes? What will I do for you? I don't know yet, but I'll work something out.

Alan.
FolsomLocalNews.com



I would like to know who erased my original post, the one Alan is responding to here. That seems like a bit of dirty pool to me. Maybe there is a logical reason, but I don't see why my post wasn't allowed to stay up so my arguements could be heard as well.
Knowing the past helps deciphering the future.

#125 mylo

mylo

    Mmm.. Tomato

  • Moderator
  • 16,763 posts
  • Location:Folsom

Posted 28 October 2007 - 05:36 PM

QUOTE(4thgenFolsomite @ Oct 28 2007, 06:22 PM) View Post
I would like to know who erased my original post, the one Alan is responding to here. That seems like a bit of dirty pool to me. Maybe there is a logical reason, but I don't see why my post wasn't allowed to stay up so my arguements could be heard as well.

I deleted a post that was 100% inside a quote. Did you respond in-line within the quote? If so, apologies, I can retrieve it for you to reformat.
"Ah, yes, those Gucci extremists and their Prada jihad!" --ducky

#126 4thgenFolsomite

4thgenFolsomite

    Hopeless Addict

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,979 posts

Posted 28 October 2007 - 06:11 PM

QUOTE(mylo @ Oct 28 2007, 06:36 PM) View Post
I deleted a post that was 100% inside a quote. Did you respond in-line within the quote? If so, apologies, I can retrieve it for you to reformat.



I would appreciate that, Mylo. I spent an hour on that post. If you want me to modify it, tell me what you need me to do.
Knowing the past helps deciphering the future.

#127 CPPWT

CPPWT

    Newbie

  • New Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 28 October 2007 - 07:21 PM

QUOTE(newsblaze @ Oct 28 2007, 01:44 PM) View Post
>> WHY CHOOSE ONLY ADVOCATES FOR THE NEW PLAN

Sorry, I didn't mean it to be that way. Here's the point I was trying to make.
1. Jeff talked about the whole process and invited everyone to take part, making the point that
2. Candy Miller was against it in the beginning, and if a 100% historic advocate can change her mind, what does that say about the idea? She says the plan is not to do away with the shed roof - it can be replaced (I'd like to see that too)

3. Richard Gray was there when the trees were put in - he has a story to show why those trees are in trouble.

4. Ellen Hester says the museum has all the research information

I should have made it clear I was talking about educating people to what is and what was. - those four people provided facts that anyone can use.

I didn't mention Courtney Puffer, at Pacific Western Traders. A few weeks ago, Courtney was 100% against this but he is now on the Design Committee. I bet he still has concerns, but he is participating and he isn't going to let this become Broadstone 2. His family has been in this area for 100 years .

I am still against the plan, but must participate in the process. I feel compelled to do what I can, to preserve what is left of the Historic District. The history of Folsom is my family's as well; my Grandparents and Great Grandparents all lived and worked in Folsom.

>>WHY NOT REPLANT MATURE TREES
Exactly - get involved and put your point across

>>OPPORTUNITY TO REPLACE THE MEDIANS IN A STRONGER AND MORE ATTRACTIVE ARRANGEMENT.
Ditto - Community involvement is requested - don't forget the vulnerability of the buildings.

>>NO DOUBT SOME THOSE OVERHANGS NEED TO BE REPAIRED/REPLACED. HOWEVER, IF ITS UP TO THE PROPERTY OWNER TO REPLACE THE AWNING BUILDING BY BUILDING (WHICH IS NOT HISTORICALLY HOW THE AWNINGS WERE CONSTRUCTED ON THE STREET FOR THE MOST PART) THEN ITS LIKELY ITS GOING TO HAVE A HODGE PODGE FEEL WITH A FAUX WESTERN FEEL. PART OF THE CHARM NOW IS THE UNIFIED COMMUNAL FEELING OF THE OVERHANG.
Hodge Podge? - check your photos of early Folsom - conformity as well as history? Remember that the HDC has to approve them. I don't know why the City decided to put up the shed roof on the buildings. "Unified Communal feeling of the overhang" - That is what hides the charming historic architecture, function over form and joins multiple buildings together. The new building at Sutter and Wool will be one big building that will look like four separate buildings. in the 700 block we have four buildings tied together as one. Wouldn't it be good to change that?

>>IF THE TREES ARE MOVED 20 FEET CLOSER TO THE BUILDINGS, THEY WILL OBSCURE THOSE HISTORIC FACADES.
Excellent point, please participate and make those points.

>> EXPAND THEIR TABLE SPACE ON THE STREET...DOESN'T BENEFIT THE MAJORITY OF THE STORES
When people have time to sit and wait for a drink or meal will they look in windows or walk into stores. When there is a draw like multiple outside cafes, I think it will bring a lot more people into the street. When the street is full of antique shops, jewelry shops etc, what is there that keeps a large number of people coming down here? I would think - and I'm no expert - that outdoor cafes would make the 700 block more vibrant.

>>I DONT THINK WE SHOULD BE SO CAVALIER ABOUT CHANGING THE VERY STRUCTURE OF IT.
Please participate and make the point. Maybe its better to let the Folsom Station area have all of the outside dining and bring people in and leave the 700 block with the existing layout after all the necessary work gets done.

>>HERE IS A QUESTION THAT HASN'T COME UP. DO THE NEW AWNINGS EXTEND OVER THE ENTIRE 20 FEET OF THE NEW WIDENED SIDEWALK?
Excellent points

>>MANY OF THE SHED ROOFS NEED REPAIR
Great points - but most of the shed roofs don't need repair - they are way beyond that - they need to be removed, get the facade fixed and then replaced and done in the right way, it can look original, if you get the right architect and the right materials and finish.

>>NEW MIX OF STORES... PROPONENTS ARE HOPING THIS FORCES SOME PEOPLE OUT.
If you were interested in buying a property there, you can't get a bank loan - too risky for most banks. You need cach - got a couple of million handy? I think some owners want to get out but its very difficult. Tenant mix is not the same as owner mix. Talking about tenant mix conjures up the idea of pushing businesses out, but consider this - what if four businesses close and a realtor, a law firm, a mortgage company and Starbucks want to set up there - what good is that going to do the street? The FHDA (merchants Association) is trying to help get these things together, to help the whole district. Disclosure - I am the FHDA Secretary.

>>IF THE 600, 800, AND 900 BLOCKS HAVE WIDENED SIDEWALKS, HOW COULD THE 700 BLOCK BE LEFT ALONE WITHOUT IT LOOKING ODD? THIS PLAN SHOULD BE COHESIVE.
They're all different now. How to get cohesive but not cookie-cutter?

>>IF WE DON'T START WITH A COHESIVE PLAN
This is exactly what is starting right now, please be a part of it. You have a lot of good ideas and you've obviously seen other places where it worked or didn't work.

I was in Golden, Colorado a couple of weeks ago. I'm doing a short story on that. They didn't have a lot of historic buildings but they have a nice feel - but its definitely not historic, even though they have a historic area. I was also in Boulder, Colorado - also very nice - and they have a car-free mall, but they also have a University with thousands of students all around it. That is what I call vibrant.

This process is not going to be easy and its not going to be done on the cheap. Its important we get it right. I live in the HD, just up the hill and I'm in the commercial area every day. I want it to be historic and vibrant and I want everyone to be successful. Don't forget, it is the merchants and the property owners who are putting their money where their mouths are, not us. Its a lot easier for us all to want to tell them what to do - we have only emotional equity in it. I guarantee you, the merchants want this to be historic - its the whole point of being here and that is the draw that brings people here, but there aren't enough people yet. The disruption may force some merchants out - they know it is risky - Stand in the merchants' shoes and think about what you would want.

I have a question for everyone on this board - and anyone not on it. If I ask you, in the next two years to help make the HD successful by spending some time down here, taking part in events, eating in restaurants, visiting shops, recommending the area to your friends and relatives, would you do it? What would it take for you to say yes? What will I do for you? I don't know yet, but I'll work something out.

Alan.
FolsomLocalNews.com



#128 CPPWT

CPPWT

    Newbie

  • New Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 29 October 2007 - 06:38 AM

I am still against the plan, but must participate in the process. I feel compelled to do what I can to preserve what is left of the Historic District. The history of Folsom is my family's as well; my Grandparents and Great Grandparents all lived and worked in Folsom.


#129 mylo

mylo

    Mmm.. Tomato

  • Moderator
  • 16,763 posts
  • Location:Folsom

Posted 29 October 2007 - 08:25 AM

I merged your post back in. Please move your comments outside of the (QUOTE) sections, so it appears you're actually responding, not just quoting someone elses entire post.

CPPWT, I see you have a 100% "quote" post above, too. Can you please move your comments outside of the quote section, otherwise it looks like you just quoted someone without adding any comment.
"Ah, yes, those Gucci extremists and their Prada jihad!" --ducky

#130 Folsomdad

Folsomdad

    Veteran

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 123 posts

Posted 29 October 2007 - 08:32 AM

I'm just glad to see the downtown area starting to get the attention its needed for a long time, it had really started to deteriorate.

#131 newsblaze

newsblaze

    All Star

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 441 posts
  • Location:folsom Historic District
  • Interests:News, computers, the garden, HFRA, bagpipes, Folsom.

Posted 29 October 2007 - 10:13 AM

QUOTE(davburr @ Oct 15 2007, 11:28 AM) View Post
the best idea I've seen yet is to close off Sutter Street - make it for pedestrians only

deliveries can be made in the back on Leidersdorf Lane (not street) - this is lane that is between the back of the buildings and the parking lot - it is accessible, its where Yagers gets their deliveries

the street could be closed off and that would make it really nice


Apparently, 8 out 10 malls fail because there is insufficient foot traffic.
You first need to make sure the area is enough of a draw to make it work.
It is under consideration, but it needs to be tested and make sure the time is right or it can kill the area.

Deliveries could be allowed in the mornings - other areas do that. Some of the buildings on the topside of the road have very poor access. On the bottom side, everything would have to be carried up all of those steps. That would double the time taken to deliver anything and some things might need more people, so its not really a good option. What works for one business might not work for them all.


Alan Gray
Read Folsom news at
http://folsomlocalnews.com
Support Our Troops, Read Their Stories
at http://newsblaze.com

#132 Dave Burrell

Dave Burrell

    Folsom Citizen

  • Moderator
  • 17,588 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Folsom
  • Interests:Beer, Photography, Travel, Art

Posted 29 October 2007 - 12:44 PM

QUOTE(newsblaze @ Oct 29 2007, 11:13 AM) View Post
Apparently, 8 out 10 malls fail because there is insufficient foot traffic.
You first need to make sure the area is enough of a draw to make it work.
It is under consideration, but it needs to be tested and make sure the time is right or it can kill the area.

Deliveries could be allowed in the mornings - other areas do that. Some of the buildings on the topside of the road have very poor access. On the bottom side, everything would have to be carried up all of those steps. That would double the time taken to deliver anything and some things might need more people, so its not really a good option. What works for one business might not work for them all.


Your first sentence there is something I need to note - (speaking for myself) I've never looked at old town Folsom on Sutter Street as a shopping mall - to me its more of a historical center with some nice restaurants and bars and a couple of curio shops

Please oh please oh please do NOT turn Sutter Street into a modern day shopping mall

Travel, food and drink blog by Davehttp://davestravels.tv

 


#133 mylo

mylo

    Mmm.. Tomato

  • Moderator
  • 16,763 posts
  • Location:Folsom

Posted 29 October 2007 - 12:51 PM

QUOTE(davburr @ Oct 29 2007, 01:44 PM) View Post
Your first sentence there is something I need to note - (speaking for myself) I've never looked at old town Folsom on Sutter Street as a shopping mall - to me its more of a historical center with some nice restaurants and bars and a couple of curio shops

Please oh please oh please do NOT turn Sutter Street into a modern day shopping mall

The median is being described as "turning Sutter St. into a 'mall' when it was installed"

I guess the definition changes generationally.
"Ah, yes, those Gucci extremists and their Prada jihad!" --ducky

#134 Dave Burrell

Dave Burrell

    Folsom Citizen

  • Moderator
  • 17,588 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Folsom
  • Interests:Beer, Photography, Travel, Art

Posted 29 October 2007 - 12:53 PM

QUOTE(mylo @ Oct 29 2007, 01:51 PM) View Post
The median is being described as "turning Sutter St. into a 'mall' when it was installed"

I guess the definition changes generationally.


I bet a few key players would like it turned into a shopping mall




Travel, food and drink blog by Davehttp://davestravels.tv

 


#135 mylo

mylo

    Mmm.. Tomato

  • Moderator
  • 16,763 posts
  • Location:Folsom

Posted 29 October 2007 - 12:56 PM

QUOTE(davburr @ Oct 29 2007, 01:53 PM) View Post
I bet a few key players would like it turned into a shopping mall

My point is: It is currently defined as a mall since it's 1970's upgrades. Perhaps some key players would like to convert the "mall" into a "lifestyle center"
"Ah, yes, those Gucci extremists and their Prada jihad!" --ducky




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users