I finally received a reply from Peter Piccardo of code enforcement.
Quote:
Mr. May, Thank you for the email and sorry for the delayed response. Things are a little busy here in Code Enforcement these days. Given our current demand and staffing level in Code Enforcement our operation has had to focus on Public Health and Safety code issues to include property maintenance, blight, substandard housing and junk cars to name a few. I hope to resume to our normal level of service soon.
Unquote:
Peter J. Piccardo, C.C.E.O
Code Enforcement Division
City of Folsom
Community Development Department
50 Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95630
916.355.7316 office
916.355.7274 fax
ppiccardo@folsom.ca.us
I got the EXACT same response this morning as well. I am sure he has been shut down by higher ups -
Who Does he actually work for ? City Manager ?
Contrast the above email from Pete with this one of October 3- and you will see the change-
>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Pete Piccardo <ppiccardo@folsom.ca.us>
>>Sent: Oct 3, 2012 2:50 PM
>>To: 'Ken
>>Subject: RE: sign ordinance- Folsom
>>
>>Mr. Smith, thank you for the email. I've looked into the locations you mentioned today, and the signs in question will be addressed. Contact was made with the sign owner.
>>
>>Peter J. Piccardo, C.C.E.O
Now if he actually HAD contacted the sign owner- then it Starsky's action to follow the LAW especially after being notified by CODE...
BTW my last several emails to Pete also CC'd Starsky and Howell...
Since Starsky is thumbing his nose at the LAW even after being notified - he certainly does not deserve to be elected... I sense a letter to the Folsom Telegraph in the making.. Anyone else want to do the same ?