Are Homes a Good Investment
#1 (The Dude)
Posted 19 April 2011 - 10:27 AM
- they lose value more often then they gain value (and the more housing that is built around here (S50), the more our prices will go down due to too over supply)
- the taxes are high
- the maintenance costs are high
- the insurance is high
when it all adds up it's about 3k a month or more for an average home.
even for those 200k houses with a mortgage of 1500 a month, that doesn't include the taxes and insurance and maintenance so the actually costs will be higher over time.
renting at 1500 with no taxes, no maintenance costs seems to be better financially - that extra money that would have been spent on buying a house can be put in the bank or investments that have better returns.
is it really worth it to spend so much money on a house only to watch it lose value over the years, sure it's a roller coaster ride that sometimes had it's highs, but I think we've seen the last of those highs for a long long time.
I guess if you bought 20-30 years ago and your house is all paid off you're ok, but what percentage of people actually fully own their homes these days? I'm betting it's a very small percentage (made up mostly of older or very wealthy people).
#2
Posted 19 April 2011 - 02:57 PM
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive" -- C.S. Lewis
If the only way to combat "global warming" was to lower taxes, we would never hear of the issue again. - Anonymous
"Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one" — Thomas Paine, 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘰𝘯 𝘚𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘦 (1776)
#3 (The Dude)
Posted 19 April 2011 - 03:37 PM
You forgot the biggest factor in your calculations...mortgage interest deduction. Let's use our modest example of 200k at say 5%. That's 10,000 dollars in interest a year that the "owner" can deduct off his income prior to being taxed. He can also deduct that 2300 dollars he paid in property tax. His net savings in taxes would depend on his total income, but figure between two to three thousand dollars saved for the year which equates to around 250.00 dollars a month.
Good points, but would $250 a month in tax savings offset the maintenance and insurance costs? On the taxes, if the owners are making $10 an hour x's 2 people, that equates to about 40k a year (before taxes), after writing off their mortgage interest (10k) and taxes (2300) are they then taxed at 27700 (still pre-taxes or is their fed and state taxes deducted before or after the mortgage interest deduction? I guess I never really realized that interest and taxes lowered my taxable income that much before, I agree that big tax write off is a good reason for home ownership.
My house is still worth a little more then I paid for it but once the short sales on my street turn into foreclosures I'm sure my home's value is going to drop dramatically. Gotta love the banks for doing that @$^@!#!
#4
Posted 19 April 2011 - 04:05 PM
Our family on the other hand couldn't stand to be restricted by someone else's rules, etc. We have 2 dogs, 2 cats and want to paint the walls whatever we choose.
Our home isn't going to make us any money for a long, long time but it's our home and we're emotionally invested in it now.
Kimberly Purcell
Productivity Consultant - Amethyst Productivity
#5
Posted 19 April 2011 - 04:10 PM
Off subject question, but are homes really a good investment? (maybe this should be in a new thread?). I keep hearing more and more they are not good investments from several different financial advisers.
As the great Will Rogers said, Buy land. They ain't making any more of the stuff.
Whether or not it's a good investment depends on your goals, but most people in America have built wealth, have done so on real estate.
Just about 1/3 of all real estate transactions so far this year have been by investors.
I'm not sure they are right because I do like owning my own home but they did bring up some good points about houses...
- they lose value more often then they gain value
HOGWASH! Think of how much a home costs in Folsom today. How much 15 years ago? 20? 30? 50? Real Estate has market dips, and even crashes, but it still costs more today than it did, in most neighborhoods, 10 years ago. My cousin bought a place in San Francisco in 1975 for $43,000. Today it's worth over a million. My home was purchased in 1997 for $175,000. I bought it in 2001 for $327,000, and today it's probably worth about $375,000..
even for those 200k houses with a mortgage of 1500 a month, that doesn't include the taxes and insurance and maintenance so the actually costs will be higher over time.
Taxes and insurance would be covered by that figure. $200,000 at 5% for 30 years is $1074 per month. Figure in about $225 for taxes and $75 for insurance. Maintenance costs vary.
Home ownership is not something to be taken lightly, but it is a great way to build wealth while lessening your tax burden.
Steve Heard
Folsom Real Estate Specialist
EXP Realty
BRE#01368503
Owner - MyFolsom.com
916 718 9577
#6
Posted 19 April 2011 - 04:12 PM
Another tax benefit of home ownership is that when you sell it, if you are lucky enough to have a profit, that profit is tax free if its less than $250000 for a single person, 500000 for married filing jointly (with some conditions). That and Roth IRA are the only ways I know of for an average person to make money tax free legally.
Finally, when you pass away and leave a home to your heirs, if they sell it right away all the profits are tax free.
All together, I think it is a good investment. If you pay rent, you are adding to someone elses equity. If you own, that money goes towards yours. The days of making thousands in a few years are gone for now, though. It needs to be a long term investment.
#7
Posted 19 April 2011 - 04:19 PM
Aside from the financial aspect, you need to look at many other variables. Is owning a home right for your family? Do you even WANT to spend the time that maintaining a home involves? I don't think a weekend goes by when we're not fixing something or doing yardwork, etc. A lot of people are flat out not interested in those responsibilities.
Our family on the other hand couldn't stand to be restricted by someone else's rules, etc. We have 2 dogs, 2 cats and want to paint the walls whatever we choose.
Our home isn't going to make us any money for a long, long time but it's our home and we're emotionally invested in it now.
Great thread and excellent replies!
I love it when thought provoking threads are started that provide very good information about a subject, I also like reading all the views and input from all sides, it's especially nice when no snarkiness is involved.
Travel, food and drink blog by Dave - http://davestravels.tv
#8 (The Dude)
Posted 19 April 2011 - 09:26 PM
Home ownership is not something to be taken lightly, but it is a great way to build wealth while lessening your tax burden.
Thank you Steve and everyone for your feedback, it is very helpful.
Steve you wrote "I bought it in 2001 for $327,000, and today it's probably worth about $375,000".
Here's the way I see that, it took 10 years to make 48k in profit on that house, if you were to sell it now, it would cost a few thousand to sell so lets just say you end up with 40-45k in profit once it's sold. 45k in profit over 10 years time. But also keep in mind that the market likely hasn't hit the bottom yet, so it could potentially go lower thus lowering your profit even further. Are there any taxes on selling a house for profit? I know there are when you sell a rental for profit but I'm not sure about a personal home.
If I were to rent a place for $1500 instead of buying a place, that with all the other previously mentioned costs would equate to about $3000 a month, I could then save that extra $1500 a month - by renting instead. (1500 for rent 1500 into savings)
$1500 x 12 month x 10 years = $180,000 that's not counting the additional interest income from a savings account or similar.
This is why I am questioning my house as an investment. 40k in 10 years, or 180k in 10 years... I honestly don't know if I'll get to the point of having 180k in profit from my house. Even when the market maxed out I didn't have that kind of profit in this house investment.
Don't get me wrong, I like my house and enjoy home ownership, and I agree with your statement about land, I'd like more myself. I'm just thinking about the math, what I'm making or losing, future savings and future retirement. Mostly I'm just thinking out loud, please don't take any of my questioning negatively, it's just my curiosity and quest for knowledge.
#9
Posted 19 April 2011 - 09:57 PM
Yes, I miss aspects of owning my own home like decorating without thought and pride of ownership. When it comes down to it, though, I have few reasons to buy.
The tax benefits are not that great when you don't have a high income. My rent is completely reasonable and it's a lot easier to budget my income and invest in diverse investments knowing that housing is a fixed cost, no furnaces or windows or leaks to fix. I have a cushion to lean on should something disastrous happen, important in a single income family. If I owned that cushion wouldnt exist because it would have been a down payment instead. Lastly, I don't think I want to stay in Folsom once my kids are out of high school; I would hate to be "stuck"'in a home should we find ourselves in another difficult economic climate.
So, I rent. Works for me. Frees my money to work better for me.
#10
Posted 19 April 2011 - 09:57 PM
A home is the place you lay your head, have your family, and where your heart is.
I don't know why it seems homeowners constantly worry about their "investment" in their homes. Where else are you going to live?
It goes back to that old saying - don't spend what you don't have.
#11
Posted 19 April 2011 - 10:02 PM
Yep, and this is true regardless of owner/renter status.A home is the place you lay your head, have your family, and where your heart is.
#12
Posted 19 April 2011 - 10:20 PM
Thank you Steve and everyone for your feedback, it is very helpful.
Steve you wrote "I bought it in 2001 for $327,000, and today it's probably worth about $375,000".
Here's the way I see that, it took 10 years to make 48k in profit on that house, if you were to sell it now, it would cost a few thousand to sell so lets just say you end up with 40-45k in profit once it's sold. 45k in profit over 10 years time. But also keep in mind that the market likely hasn't hit the bottom yet, so it could potentially go lower thus lowering your profit even further. Are there any taxes on selling a house for profit? I know there are when you sell a rental for profit but I'm not sure about a personal home.
If I were to rent a place for $1500 instead of buying a place, that with all the other previously mentioned costs would equate to about $3000 a month, I could then save that extra $1500 a month - by renting instead. (1500 for rent 1500 into savings)
$1500 x 12 month x 10 years = $180,000 that's not counting the additional interest income from a savings account or similar.
This is why I am questioning my house as an investment. 40k in 10 years, or 180k in 10 years... I honestly don't know if I'll get to the point of having 180k in profit from my house. Even when the market maxed out I didn't have that kind of profit in this house investment.
Don't get me wrong, I like my house and enjoy home ownership, and I agree with your statement about land, I'd like more myself. I'm just thinking about the math, what I'm making or losing, future savings and future retirement. Mostly I'm just thinking out loud, please don't take any of my questioning negatively, it's just my curiosity and quest for knowledge.
I wish there was a tax expert her to help us with the math!
From my perspective, I think your numbers may be off. For example, if your house payment including tax and insurance is $1500, what are you spending the other $1500 on to bring your costs to $3000?
Is a house a good investment? For some, yes. Had I sold my house in 2005 when it was apprased at $522,000, I would have replied to that question with a resounding 'YES!', as I would have made $195,000 in 4 years time.
The housing market, like the stock market, is cyclical and prone to swings, but overall homes cost much more today than they did 10, 15 years ago and a helluva lot more than they did 20 to 30 years ago. My house is worth $198,000 more today than the previous owner paid in 1997, so had he still owned it, he'd probably be happy. If he'd bought it for $522,000 in 2005, he'd likely be pretty po'd.
If someone is saving for retirement, real estate can be a great hedge against inflation. If one is looking for a higher rate of return on their money than they can get through CD's and most other interest-bearing vehicles, being a landlord might be a good idea, providing income and tax benefits, including depreciation even if the house actually goes up in value (someday). I have to say that I am not a tax expert and can't give tax advice, so don't quote me on that one!
If someone is looking for a quick buck, real estate probably isn't a good investment.
It's not for everyone.
Steve Heard
Folsom Real Estate Specialist
EXP Realty
BRE#01368503
Owner - MyFolsom.com
916 718 9577
#13
Posted 19 April 2011 - 10:39 PM
I think there is a lot more awareness now on "home value." Not that it really changes anything, but perhaps gives us another viewpoint.
This weekend, I talked to a realtor for a development having a "close-out" sale. Granted, they were offering about a 25% discount from the price 1-2 years ago, with lots of "freebies" throw in. But the bottom line, was it was not an ideal location (not even close), and the base price was still above my budget, as would be the tax base. The realtor tried to shame me into not considering the house an investment because I was concerned about the over-budget base price. I almost fell for it, but THANKFULLY, my friends talked me down to reality.
So, during the bubble, the market forces pushed people to buy more than they could afford, and now post bubble, the same forces are attempting to do the very same thing, but by twisting the words previously used to push, but now to pull.....
I've noticed the same shady financing deals are available too...
#14 (The Dude)
Posted 19 April 2011 - 10:44 PM
A home is the place you lay your head, have your family, and where your heart is.
True and a home is where you are at and it's the same whether you own or rent. Do you think there is a difference in the meaning of one's home when it's rented vs owned (or should I say heavily in debt for)
I don't know why it seems homeowners constantly worry about their "investment" in their homes. Where else are you going to live?
Where else? Rental House, Condo, Apartment
It goes back to that old saying - don't spend what you don't have.
That's already a given and I didn't buy more then I could afford, but I question how much I will make (or lose) on this investment.
#15 (The Dude)
Posted 19 April 2011 - 10:56 PM
I wish there was a tax expert her to help us with the math!
Me too because I'll never claim to be a math and tax expert.
From my perspective, I think your numbers may be off. For example, if your house payment including tax and insurance is $1500, what are you spending the other $1500 on to bring your costs to $3000?
I was basing this on a $1500 mortgage plus tax, plus insurance, plus maintenance/upkeep costs.
Is a house a good investment? For some, yes. Had I sold my house in 2005 when it was apprased at $522,000, I would have replied to that question with a resounding 'YES!', as I would have made $195,000 in 4 years time.
I think what I'm finding is that the way to make money would be to move more often, selling the house when it's value is up. I too wish I sold in '05.
Would you say the best way to make money on a house investment is to flip it and move often? or is it more profitable to stay in it for 20-30 years as a long term investment to eventually own it outright, to later pass on to our kids?
If someone is saving for retirement, real estate can be a great hedge against inflation. If one is looking for a higher rate of return on their money than they can get through CD's and most other interest-bearing vehicles, being a landlord might be a good idea, providing income and tax benefits, including depreciation even if the house actually goes up in value (someday).
That is exactly what I needed to hear.
If someone is looking for a quick buck, real estate probably isn't a good investment.
Well, except for those guys who can afford to flip houses for short term quick profits
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users