Ducky,
I completely respect your right believe that there wasn't an election conspiracy by not busting these places until after the election.
Maybe a better question might be, Is the City and this council capable of delaying the busting of these places until after an election?
Given what the City ( & council ) has done over the years, like giving away the water to S50 after saying they couldn't do that ( at a meeting before Christmas knowing Residents would be less likely to pay attention and possibly mount a referendum), then suing the residents to preclude any legal action regarding this matter.
The election 6 years ago, Jeff talked about all his work regarding increasing the surplus, yet 6 (SIX) days after the election they City announces a budget deficit of almost 9 million.
Jeff, Steve and Kerri have all publically stated that the landowners paid for the all planning costs for S50, yet when I requested through a PIA all the hours that staff spent during this, I was told in WRITING there wasn't a system to track the hours. If there isn't any system to track hours how can anyone be sure its accurate?
During the last election, Jeff had 2 campaign signs side by side, clearly exceeding the then limits of 40 sq', yet the CM did nothing, except to say he was looking into it. He still must be looking into it since he has never said anything else about it.
During a past election, a challenger was told their sign was placed in an illegal area, but the incumbents sign right next to it was legal. Somebody then went out and removed that challenger's sign and moved the incumbents sign to the stakes where the challengers sign was said to be illegal and put up a different challengers sign on the stakes where in the incumbents sign was and within 24 hours the new Challenger sign was told their sign was illegal and the incumbents sign was legal, by the city.
Look at all of Jeffs bullying, First to the Fire Union Rep, ( after he won the election) To Legal services and to the Security Guard. There's no doubt he is capable of anything.
Consider Kerrie's recent FB posting, encouraging her supporters to basically sabotage Rogers FB and NOT to let Kerrie's posting fall into the wrong hands.
Given all these things and others that I can add, there isn't any doubt in mind that the powers to be are most capable of holding off on busting these massage parlors to avoid having any embarrassing news come out during an election.
Anyone else want to share your thoughts regarding if you feel these powers to be are capable of postponing busting massage parlors during an election to possibly help the incumbents win reelection?