This article originally from NYT, but I found it on MSN talks about the concerns of development vs water conservation in CA. A lot of coverage is dedicated to the South of 50 development and Evert Palmer and Jennifer Lane are both interviewed:
http://www.msn.com/e...cid=mailsignout
Thank you for this.
Clearly development advocates continue to claim the water really is sufficient and the drought is just a passing fluke.
Annoying that we pay a city manager to tell the lie that "water rights" give, and will continue to give, developments the water -- even though this water DOES NOT EXIST.
Pro-rapid-growth offers opinions instead of science, and inaccuracies that will not fill the taps.
(Edited Cross posted content- This is about So of 50- you have the other topic to talk about Folsom Lake)