Jump to content






Trayvon Martin's Death - and other issues


  • Please log in to reply
343 replies to this topic

#16 The Average Joe

The Average Joe

    Hopeless Addict

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,155 posts

Posted 11 April 2012 - 10:58 PM

wait a minute. did you say its open season on white people? do you need tags or a license and is there a limit? :)

I only hunt home invasion robbers...You don't need tags, there is no limit, and they are always in season!

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive" -- C.S. Lewis

 

If the only way to combat "global warming" was to lower taxes, we would never hear of the issue again. - Anonymous

 

"Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one" — Thomas Paine, 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘰𝘯 𝘚𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘦 (1776)

 


#17 Carl G

Carl G

    Hall Of Famer

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,674 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 April 2012 - 08:21 AM

...
No, I haven't made up my mind about Zimmerman's guilt. Like you, all I know is what I've read, seen and heard in the news. I heard the tape of Zimmerman saying he was going to follow Trayvon, and heard the dispatcher advise against it.
...

Steve - I think you have your tense wrong. Zimmerman was following Trayvon. Here is a transcript from the 911 call:

911 dispatcher:
Are you following him? [2:24]

Zimmerman:
Yeah. [2:25]

911 dispatcher:
OK.
We don’t need you to do that. [2:26]

Zimmerman:
OK. [2:28]

If you listen to the tape, Zimmerman was breathing heavily from running after Trayvon. About 10 seconds or so after the 911 operator told him "We don't need you to do that" Zimmerman's breath returns to normal suggesting he stopped running after Trayvon. His family/friends say he stopped and was returning to his truck when Trayvon came up behind him.
In an interview with Nancy Grace yesterday, I saw a friend of Zimmerman make the point that Trayvon was a 6'3" football player capable of running 100 yards in less than 10 seconds. Given that there is no way that if Trayvon was running away from Zimmerman to evade him he would be able to catch him, with Zimmerman being (I think his friend called him) pudgy.

In anycase, Zimmerman has been arrested and is now going through the legal system. I have full faith in the legal system that whatever happens will be correct.

#18 old soldier

old soldier

    Living Legend

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,715 posts

Posted 12 April 2012 - 09:05 AM

folks who have their mind made up either way are going to feel stupid when the trial is finally over. and this trial will be as big as the oj trial, not because it deserves it but because its being used by folks with another adjenda

the idiot black panthers are using it for publicity and shame on the cameraman who slides up to them to record their trash.

shame on the news folks who can see the tril as a way to boost ratings. the different networks are gearing up like its an olympic event

the timing is bad, cause we have a do nothing president fighting for his political life and sees this here event as another way to divide the country and get votes.

I have said before being old, I can see the progress made with race relations over the past 50 years and am proud like a lot of other white folks of how color blind things have gotten. cases like this bring things in the other direction.

its probably going to turn our that we have a wanta bee cop, who can only rise to the position of neighborhood watch captain, packing a gun against instructions who forced an encounter with a young black kid that may have shown his disapproval of being watched by punching the wanta bee in the nose and the fight which followed went against the wanta be who fired the shot while he was on his back getting tuned up.

the next problem will be if zimmerman gets convicted of a lesser offense, we will be back in the prepare for a riot mode

in a way we are all to blame because we are the ones the news people think want wire to wire coverate of this sad situation.

#19 (MaxineR)

(MaxineR)
  • Visitors

Posted 12 April 2012 - 01:56 PM

folks who have their mind made up either way are going to feel stupid when the trial is finally over. and this trial will be as big as the oj trial, not because it deserves it but because its being used by folks with another adjenda

the idiot black panthers are using it for publicity and shame on the cameraman who slides up to them to record their trash.

shame on the news folks who can see the tril as a way to boost ratings. the different networks are gearing up like its an olympic event

the timing is bad, cause we have a do nothing president fighting for his political life and sees this here event as another way to divide the country and get votes.

I have said before being old, I can see the progress made with race relations over the past 50 years and am proud like a lot of other white folks of how color blind things have gotten. cases like this bring things in the other direction.

its probably going to turn our that we have a wanta bee cop, who can only rise to the position of neighborhood watch captain, packing a gun against instructions who forced an encounter with a young black kid that may have shown his disapproval of being watched by punching the wanta bee in the nose and the fight which followed went against the wanta be who fired the shot while he was on his back getting tuned up.

the next problem will be if zimmerman gets convicted of a lesser offense, we will be back in the prepare for a riot mode

in a way we are all to blame because we are the ones the news people think want wire to wire coverate of this sad situation.



I’ve asked my self why this incident has generated so much anger among those in the black community. Trayvon was NOT shot by someone that was paid law enforcement. Zimmerman was not part of the police force nor was he a paid security guard, that I know of. The answer is our lame media. They played only part of Zimmerman’s conversation with the police and made people believe the worst. At minium, they should lose their license for false reporting. At best, they should be arrested for disturbing the peace and inciting violence.

Old soldier you are the only one who sees through the BS as to what is really taking place. The Obama administration has divided us by class according to how much money a person makes, and now is dividing us by racial lines. He needed to keep his mouth shut because he TOO is guilty of inciting people to commit violent acts. By NSA standards, that is an offense subject to arrest. It’s shameful that a man in the position of president is acting so un-presidential and has stirred the pot not once, but throughout his term in office.

Zimmerman was called a “White Hispanic”. Why would anyone use that term, but to incite racial hate? (You know whites are blamed for everything under the sun) My feeling is that all of us are being played. This administration is pushing our buttons and trying to get a political edge by turning us against each other....just as you stated. Obama has used this race card since he started running for the office of president, and it is unforgivable.

The hateful words of those who say they want justice won’t go away over night. The truth of how our black race really feels is coming forth. And, it’s frightening. Gun sales are going through the roof, home security systems are too. Everybody is on edge, wondering what will happen next and checking their door and window locks twice before going to bed. All races in America are now watching where they go and what they do. It’s crazy. And yes, it has set us back in race relations in America. We have seen that when it comes down to it, too many think race, when they should be thinking “Human Being”.

We have seen what happens when civil unrest reaches unmanageable levels. The big guns are brought out and many of the participants go to the hospital or morgues. The OWS didn’t result in what those people were after. The riots of the past in Watts didn’t result in what those people wanted either. And now, our government has even more advanced weapons for riot control. One has to think they may be wanting to thin the herd. But, if anyone thinks they can riot and go away unharmed, they better think twice....

http://www.alternet.org/world/151864/6_creepy_new_weapons_the_police_and_military_use_to_subdue_unarmed_people?page=entire

We won’t hear about the horrible weapons used against those who riot, because it’s too fearful for most of the public to handle. But the police are fully prepared for a worse case incident and won’t have any problem finding body bags as they have stocked up, as they were told to do.

WE all have been played and it’s a shame that most don’t see it.

#20 Steve Heard

Steve Heard

    Owner

  • Admin
  • 13,752 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 April 2012 - 04:27 PM

folks who have their mind made up either way are going to feel stupid when the trial is finally over. and this trial will be as big as the oj trial, not because it deserves it but because its being used by folks with another adjenda

the idiot black panthers are using it for publicity and shame on the cameraman who slides up to them to record their trash.

shame on the news folks who can see the tril as a way to boost ratings. the different networks are gearing up like its an olympic event

the timing is bad, cause we have a do nothing president fighting for his political life and sees this here event as another way to divide the country and get votes.

I have said before being old, I can see the progress made with race relations over the past 50 years and am proud like a lot of other white folks of how color blind things have gotten. cases like this bring things in the other direction.

its probably going to turn our that we have a wanta bee cop, who can only rise to the position of neighborhood watch captain, packing a gun against instructions who forced an encounter with a young black kid that may have shown his disapproval of being watched by punching the wanta bee in the nose and the fight which followed went against the wanta be who fired the shot while he was on his back getting tuned up.

the next problem will be if zimmerman gets convicted of a lesser offense, we will be back in the prepare for a riot mode

in a way we are all to blame because we are the ones the news people think want wire to wire coverate of this sad situation.


This is probably your best post ever, and you've made some good ones (and a few I disagreed with).

Steve Heard

Folsom Real Estate Specialist

EXP Realty

BRE#01368503

Owner - MyFolsom.com

916 718 9577 


#21 (The Dude)

(The Dude)
  • Visitors

Posted 13 April 2012 - 05:53 AM

If it was a black man (with a long history like Zimmerman's of domestic abuse, violence etc) who shot dead a white unarmed kid, you would have the same kind of protests.


If it happened to a white guy it wouldn't be in the news at all let alone daily, Obama wouldn't care or say anything about it and a picture of an 11 year version of the victim who is now 17 wouldn't be on the front page of people magazine. But most of all there would be no protests, the kkk wouldn't call for a bounty on the shooter and Ted Turner wouldn't tweet the shooters address telling whites to go get him

#22 Chris

Chris

    Hopeless Addict

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,857 posts
  • Location:Folsom CA

Posted 13 April 2012 - 07:29 AM

Like many a tragedy this one started out with one single mistake and then was followed by several more mistakes.... The first mistake was to go outside your home with a gun and follow somebody....... This should never be done unless you are dreaming or in a movie....!
I can only imagine the several mistakes made afterwards, probably by both parties.....
In the end, Zimmerman is a grown man and should know better, Trayvon was still a kid mentally even though he looked like a man to most of us, he was just a kid. I'm with the old soldier on this one, somebody playing "cop".

You also know that this won't end well when the half-wit, internet twitter crowd, and racist posses putting a bounty on someones head and start posting home addresses.

There are only two people in this world I am sure that see this as a "positive" event... Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. This is the perfect storm to give them the excuse to come out from under their respective rocks.

Chris

1A - 2A = -1A


#23 asbestoshills

asbestoshills

    Hall Of Famer

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,811 posts

Posted 13 April 2012 - 08:42 AM

If it happened to a white guy it wouldn't be in the news at all let alone daily, Obama wouldn't care or say anything about it and a picture of an 11 year version of the victim who is now 17 wouldn't be on the front page of people magazine. But most of all there would be no protests, the kkk wouldn't call for a bounty on the shooter and Ted Turner wouldn't tweet the shooters address telling whites to go get him

The media is the one who posted those pics, not the family or the police. So, ask yourself who is trying to instigate the matter? Also, how do you know what the KKK would do? If a white boy unarmed with a bag of Skittles and an iced tea would've been shot by a black guy claiming to be a neighborhood watch patrolman (not exactly a real cop) I think there would be plenty of protests from outraged citizens. Why? Because either way there was no justice done. Zimmerman was not even arrested for killing a child. Also, obviously you aren't a black man, but Obama is half black and there is a long history of killing black men, in this case a boy, without much reason. Hello, you cannot deny that there is police brutality in some cities. It exists, just like racism. Now, as president, he shouldn't have said anything until he knew all of the facts, however, what if he is right? What if this Zimmerman didn't get hurt or wasn't threatened and decided to kill this kid b/c he was black? Then you wouldn't be complaining about anything. Before you start protecting Zimmerman's rights, you might want to look at his background and history. He's not the brightest bulb in the pack and seems mentally unstable to say the least. In fact, the victim had his own issues at school, but either way, an unarmed child is dead.
Americans, don't just come in one color or race.

#24 Robert Giacometti

Robert Giacometti

    There are no Dumb questions

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,850 posts

Posted 13 April 2012 - 10:30 AM

The media is the one who posted those pics, not the family or the police. So, ask yourself who is trying to instigate the matter? Also, how do you know what the KKK would do? If a white boy unarmed with a bag of Skittles and an iced tea would've been shot by a black guy claiming to be a neighborhood watch patrolman (not exactly a real cop) I think there would be plenty of protests from outraged citizens. Why? Because either way there was no justice done. Zimmerman was not even arrested for killing a child. Also, obviously you aren't a black man, but Obama is half black and there is a long history of killing black men, in this case a boy, without much reason. Hello, you cannot deny that there is police brutality in some cities. It exists, just like racism. Now, as president, he shouldn't have said anything until he knew all of the facts, however, what if he is right? What if this Zimmerman didn't get hurt or wasn't threatened and decided to kill this kid b/c he was black? Then you wouldn't be complaining about anything. Before you start protecting Zimmerman's rights, you might want to look at his background and history. He's not the brightest bulb in the pack and seems mentally unstable to say the least. In fact, the victim had his own issues at school, but either way, an unarmed child is dead.


Instead of looking at the hype and the misleading protrayel that the media and others have been promoting, maybe we should all look at the facts of what happened, right before shots were fired?

Hypothetically, If indeed, one person was banging another persons head off the concrete and the person who was having their head banged off the concrete feared that were about to be killed, I could see how that person may have used a gun to protect themselves.....regardless of everyone's skin color.

What would you do if someone was banging your head on the concrete and you felt you were going to be killed by an unarmed person and you had a gun and skittles? Would you use that gun to save your own life or would you allow the beating to continue?

In this particular case, I can support leaders demanding answers as to what happened. However, IMO leaders should be doing it in a manner to get to the truth, without playing the race card, further dividing our country!

From my perspective there is a double standard in our country, yet I know there is also discrimination based upon race. I think we would all agree that when we see a double standard, it can create a resentment of some sorts by others who aren't benefitting from the double standard.

Its rather easy for me as a white male to point out the double standard, yet since I haven't experienced the discrimination to the degree that minorities have, I can empathize with their frustration and anger.

I'm still believing though, that the best solution is to change our laws that eliminate all categories that people are assigned into and change our laws that give preferential treatment to some. This would give everyone the same opportunity and eliminate the resentment of preferential treatmnet and HOPEFULLY reduce the amount of discrimination.

#25 (MaxineR)

(MaxineR)
  • Visitors

Posted 13 April 2012 - 04:01 PM

Instead of looking at the hype and the misleading protrayel that the media and others have been promoting, maybe we should all look at the facts of what happened, right before shots were fired?

Hypothetically, If indeed, one person was banging another persons head off the concrete and the person who was having their head banged off the concrete feared that were about to be killed, I could see how that person may have used a gun to protect themselves.....regardless of everyone's skin color.

What would you do if someone was banging your head on the concrete and you felt you were going to be killed by an unarmed person and you had a gun and skittles? Would you use that gun to save your own life or would you allow the beating to continue?

In this particular case, I can support leaders demanding answers as to what happened. However, IMO leaders should be doing it in a manner to get to the truth, without playing the race card, further dividing our country!

From my perspective there is a double standard in our country, yet I know there is also discrimination based upon race. I think we would all agree that when we see a double standard, it can create a resentment of some sorts by others who aren't benefitting from the double standard.

Its rather easy for me as a white male to point out the double standard, yet since I haven't experienced the discrimination to the degree that minorities have, I can empathize with their frustration and anger.

I'm still believing though, that the best solution is to change our laws that eliminate all categories that people are assigned into and change our laws that give preferential treatment to some. This would give everyone the same opportunity and eliminate the resentment of preferential treatmnet and HOPEFULLY reduce the amount of discrimination.


Good post....but...
For the benefit of those of us who don’t know what laws are in place today, if their are, which discriminates against certain races, could you state what those laws are? And could you also keep the time line within the last forty years? It’s understood by all that there was discrimination before that and most agree it was wrong. If it was backed by law after forty years, is another matter.

I DO KNOW that with Affirmative Action, whites were denied jobs so minorities could have them. Those laws required that some jobs have a quota of minorities per whites. Most of those laws were in the public sector, I believe.

However, I’ve known NO laws like that which keep minorities from getting jobs. If there were, I’d be interested to know what laws they were.

Regardless, It’s clear that any past actions that have been taken to include minorities as equal to whites has failed to satisfy those who still have deep racial hatred of whites. And there seems to be millions out there willing to have another civil war, forgetting that white men were the ones who voted that slavery be abolished. Something the whites have never gotten any credit for.

Currently there are Hate Crimes, that only include lawless acts against a minority, but they exclude whites. (As if whites have never been discriminated against.)

The “Stand Your Ground” law does not have race or gender included, as I understand it. And in my opinion, is a fair law that allows a person the defend themselves, even if deadly force is needed. I think this law is a common sense law, considering that a group of people can gang up on one person and the only action the person can take is to try and escape.

This is called, justifiable homicide in most cases. I find it interested that some teens who are much bigger than an average man, can get off killing another human being, with the defense that they didn’t know any better because of their youth. I knew it was wrong to kill by age eight.
I would be careful with this sort of reasoning because it can cut both ways. Are we calling Trayvon mentally deficient or not having the mental ability to know a violent attack is wrong, if he did, in fact, attack Zimmerman?

WE don’t know what happened and should wait for the investigators to discover the evidence.

#26 supermom

supermom

    Supermom

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,225 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 13 April 2012 - 04:10 PM

I've asked my self why this incident has generated so much anger among those in the black community. Trayvon was NOT shot by someone that was paid law enforcement. Zimmerman was not part of the police force nor was he a paid security guard, that I know of. The answer is our lame media. They played only part of Zimmerman's conversation with the police and made people believe the worst. At minium, they should lose their license for false reporting. At best, they should be arrested for disturbing the peace and inciting violence.

Old soldier you are the only one who sees through the BS as to what is really taking place. The Obama administration has divided us by class according to how much money a person makes, and now is dividing us by racial lines. He needed to keep his mouth shut because he TOO is guilty of inciting people to commit violent acts. By NSA standards, that is an offense subject to arrest. It's shameful that a man in the position of president is acting so un-presidential and has stirred the pot not once, but throughout his term in office.

Zimmerman was called a "White Hispanic". Why would anyone use that term, but to incite racial hate? (You know whites are blamed for everything under the sun) My feeling is that all of us are being played. This administration is pushing our buttons and trying to get a political edge by turning us against each other....just as you stated. Obama has used this race card since he started running for the office of president, and it is unforgivable.

The hateful words of those who say they want justice won't go away over night. The truth of how our black race really feels is coming forth. And, it's frightening. Gun sales are going through the roof, home security systems are too. Everybody is on edge, wondering what will happen next and checking their door and window locks twice before going to bed. All races in America are now watching where they go and what they do. It's crazy. And yes, it has set us back in race relations in America. We have seen that when it comes down to it, too many think race, when they should be thinking "Human Being".

We have seen what happens when civil unrest reaches unmanageable levels. The big guns are brought out and many of the participants go to the hospital or morgues. The OWS didn't result in what those people were after. The riots of the past in Watts didn't result in what those people wanted either. And now, our government has even more advanced weapons for riot control. One has to think they may be wanting to thin the herd. But, if anyone thinks they can riot and go away unharmed, they better think twice....

http://www.alternet....ple?page=entire

We won't hear about the horrible weapons used against those who riot, because it's too fearful for most of the public to handle. But the police are fully prepared for a worse case incident and won't have any problem finding body bags as they have stocked up, as they were told to do.

WE all have been played and it's a shame that most don't see it.


you forgot to mention that zimmerman was carrying a loaded weapon, acting in the courses of a security guard without a licensed guard card, and that he has been arrested and released on two other times for illegally working as a securtity guard, causing great harm to a person while in the performance of his duties against people who were too inebriated to defend themselves, and that he also has been investigated for tax evasion for working as a security guard and being paid under the table while not licensed.


This guy hospital a man and a woman on two separate occasion. Don't let his "pudginess" confuse you with unskilled and dangerous security guard working outside the bounds of legally appropriate behavior.

As a security guard your job is not to be a man of the castle. Your job is to observe and report.

edit to add:

This is why the gated community HOA now has a lawsuit against it for the death of Treyvon, as well.

They allowed the watch guard to be an unlicensed security guard and carry a loaded weapon (which requires another license for security guards in Florida).
The lawsuit contends that the HOA knowingly put Treyvon in danger by authorizing Zimmerman to act as head of security and watch guard, and informed residents of the gated community in writing to go to him for issues related to security.

This guy knew he was acting outside the requirements of the law, because he had been informed by the police on separate occasions that he needed to be licensed. He may not have acted under motivation of a hate crime (I'm not sure we will ever know since there aren't any witnesses and the victim is dead), and he may not have pre-meditated this death; but I do believe that through his poor choices he should be considered for an act of manslaughter.

#27 Robert Giacometti

Robert Giacometti

    There are no Dumb questions

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,850 posts

Posted 13 April 2012 - 05:09 PM

you forgot to mention that zimmerman was carrying a loaded weapon, acting in the courses of a security guard without a licensed guard card, and that he has been arrested and released on two other times for illegally working as a securtity guard, causing great harm to a person while in the performance of his duties against people who were too inebriated to defend themselves, and that he also has been investigated for tax evasion for working as a security guard and being paid under the table while not licensed.


This guy hospital a man and a woman on two separate occasion. Don't let his "pudginess" confuse you with unskilled and dangerous security guard working outside the bounds of legally appropriate behavior.

As a security guard your job is not to be a man of the castle. Your job is to observe and report.

edit to add:

This is why the gated community HOA now has a lawsuit against it for the death of Treyvon, as well.

They allowed the watch guard to be an unlicensed security guard and carry a loaded weapon (which requires another license for security guards in Florida).
The lawsuit contends that the HOA knowingly put Treyvon in danger by authorizing Zimmerman to act as head of security and watch guard, and informed residents of the gated community in writing to go to him for issues related to security.

This guy knew he was acting outside the requirements of the law, because he had been informed by the police on separate occasions that he needed to be licensed. He may not have acted under motivation of a hate crime (I'm not sure we will ever know since there aren't any witnesses and the victim is dead), and he may not have pre-meditated this death; but I do believe that through his poor choices he should be considered for an act of manslaughter.


If someone was banging your head off the concrete and you felt you were going to die, would you shoot them to save yourself?

#28 The Average Joe

The Average Joe

    Hopeless Addict

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,155 posts

Posted 13 April 2012 - 05:39 PM

This guy knew he was acting outside the requirements of the law, because he had been informed by the police on separate occasions that he needed to be licensed. He may not have acted under motivation of a hate crime (I'm not sure we will ever know since there aren't any witnesses and the victim is dead), and he may not have pre-meditated this death; but I do believe that through his poor choices he should be considered for an act of manslaughter.

Source?

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive" -- C.S. Lewis

 

If the only way to combat "global warming" was to lower taxes, we would never hear of the issue again. - Anonymous

 

"Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one" — Thomas Paine, 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘰𝘯 𝘚𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘦 (1776)

 


#29 (MaxineR)

(MaxineR)
  • Visitors

Posted 13 April 2012 - 07:18 PM

This guy knew he was acting outside the requirements of the law, because he had been informed by the police on separate occasions that he needed to be licensed. He may not have acted under motivation of a hate crime (I'm not sure we will ever know since there aren't any witnesses and the victim is dead), and he may not have pre-meditated this death; but I do believe that through his poor choices he should be considered for an act of manslaughter.

Source?



I’ll answer that for ya....there are no sources but what the news media puts out. Even comments made by authorities don’t stand up in court without evidence. So not all public statements by some are going to have any merit in court.

Basically, Zimmerman must be proved to have INTENTED to kill to be convicted of second degree murder. It IS NOT against the law to defend yourself with deadly force if you fear your life is in danger.

It is called justifiable homicide.

Some women have gotten off killing their husbands when they had been beaten in the past and knew they would get beaten within an inch of their life, had they not taken action to defend themselves.

Zimmerman must be proven to have intended to kill Trayvon and the evidence will be given to that effect. I think he was trying to stop his attacker and the unfortunate result was the death of Trayvon. But if a person attacks another, they had better be prepared to die because we all have a right to defend ourselves.....license or not, right behavior or not, black or white.

No one has a right to beat you within an inch of your life, even if they think you deserve it.

Unfortunately, many thugs on the street think some do deserve a “Beat Down” whenever they act in ways they disagree with.

#30 Homer

Homer

    Superstar

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 697 posts

Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:54 PM

folks who have their mind made up either way are going to feel stupid when the trial is finally over. and this trial will be as big as the oj trial, not because it deserves it but because its being used by folks with another adjenda

the idiot black panthers are using it for publicity and shame on the cameraman who slides up to them to record their trash.

shame on the news folks who can see the tril as a way to boost ratings. the different networks are gearing up like its an olympic event

the timing is bad, cause we have a do nothing president fighting for his political life and sees this here event as another way to divide the country and get votes.

I have said before being old, I can see the progress made with race relations over the past 50 years and am proud like a lot of other white folks of how color blind things have gotten. cases like this bring things in the other direction.

its probably going to turn our that we have a wanta bee cop, who can only rise to the position of neighborhood watch captain, packing a gun against instructions who forced an encounter with a young black kid that may have shown his disapproval of being watched by punching the wanta bee in the nose and the fight which followed went against the wanta be who fired the shot while he was on his back getting tuned up.

the next problem will be if zimmerman gets convicted of a lesser offense, we will be back in the prepare for a riot mode

in a way we are all to blame because we are the ones the news people think want wire to wire coverate of this sad situation.

Great post, The media has been irresponsible in their reporting of this unfortunate incident.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users