QUOTE(davburr @ May 10 2005, 03:09 PM)
You are correct and that is indeed the case. This may have an impact on their future when new elections occur. I for one will be sure to get out and vote and do what I can to get folks in office who are more in tune with current (modern) society.
It's too bad the democratic process couldn't go one step further and allow the city to vote on these types of issues, but I'm sure that would be nearly impossible. I'm no expert on this stuff, but I do feel strongly about the decisions being made. I believe that there is an old mentality (in the current office) that assumes a business like this is not good for our society - perhaps that is based on the age of the elected officials (?) - maybe they do not know what people really want and so they push their own ideals and views on others....but you said it all - they were elected and so it was their choice to do what they did - the only solution is to make a better decision in the future in who we elect to represent our city.
Thanks for the input
Dave
Public voting is quite expensive, as Arnold is about to demonstrate with the special election and was already obviously demonstrated with the recall of his predecessor.
I, for one, do not want the city to foot the bill to let every citizen have their voice in this matter. This is what we pay our officials to do, to represent us. It is part of their job, and many do it admirably, to poll their constituency in order to better represent our wishes.
If you are not being heard: a) your representatives are doing a bad job and not listening, b) you're not speaking loudly or clearly, or c) you're just outnumbered. Talk to them (many also use email regularly) and find out which one it is.
In my opinion, more often that not, it's b) that's the culprit.
and yes, okay okay, republic! Protect the fathe.. er.. homeland!