You can fool all of the people some of the time. City had 2 choices for commercial feedback collection. They hired MindMixer -- like before. The city draft document online is revolting: only one sentence is devoted to public infrastructure handling raw sewage, and one for stormwater.
Here's my feedback: give us Engineered Reports to evaluate. Tell us what the Geotechnical Reports say about building on loose rock piles. Release Youngdahl Geotech Reports to all, because lots of this place are rock piles, and are not safe. 42 gas leaks in < 12 sq miles!!
Oh well, same old... here's a statement describing difference between Mindmixer and MetroQuest:
.Key Differences Between MetroQuest and MindMixer
Breadth and number of participants desired
How important is it to engage the widest demographic and attract the most participants possible?
MindMixer: Attracts the most enthusiastic and motivated stakeholders.
Tools like MindMixer, which require people to register before participating, attract about 90% less participants compared to tools that allow users to participate instantly. The reason is simple: on average only 10% of visitors (typically the most motivated stakeholders) are willing to register before participating in a planning project. On projects where both MetroQuest and MindMixer were used, MetroQuest collected input from approximately 10x the number of participants compared with MindMixer.
MetroQuest: Attracts a large number of participants from a broad demographic.
To maximize participation visitors can begin contributing instantly with MetroQuest as there is no mandatory registration step. The result is typically 10x the number of participants compared with tools with mandatory registration. To avoid the possibility of people abusing the system, MetroQuest has a sophisticated fraud detection capability so it’s easy to identify and eliminate any abusers. MetroQuest collects demographic information and email addresses at the end when people are most invested in the project.