I'm with you stacycam. I think I want to sue this woman and the Kemper guy (or whatever his name is) for annoying me with their frivolous lawsuits. They're wasting time and money of others--and for what when they can simply communicate with the owners/administrators in a mature manner rather than going straight for the jugular. Yes, it's sad that they're disabled, but obviously they are also bored and looking to blame others for their disabilities. Get over it already.
Squeeze Inn Getting Sued And May Close!
#31
Posted 08 July 2009 - 02:17 PM
I'm with you stacycam. I think I want to sue this woman and the Kemper guy (or whatever his name is) for annoying me with their frivolous lawsuits. They're wasting time and money of others--and for what when they can simply communicate with the owners/administrators in a mature manner rather than going straight for the jugular. Yes, it's sad that they're disabled, but obviously they are also bored and looking to blame others for their disabilities. Get over it already.
#32
Posted 08 July 2009 - 02:27 PM
#33
Posted 08 July 2009 - 02:34 PM
I like that solution much better then handing over wads of cash to the lawsuit happy plaintiff
Travel, food and drink blog by Dave - http://davestravels.tv
#34
Posted 08 July 2009 - 02:49 PM
#36
Posted 09 July 2009 - 12:06 PM
I think most of these ADA lawsuits stink - but not more than those that file them... The B can go through a Burger King Drive though - or just die
http://www.sacbee.co...ry/2013324.html
Another great day in the adventure of exploration and sight.
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed people can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has"
-Margaret Mead-
#37
Posted 09 July 2009 - 12:13 PM
The only positive thing from this is parking for the next door businesses will be better but that is it. This women will still fail to get a burger there with ADA compliant wheelchair access so everyone loses.
Time for a riddle - What do you call 1 million lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?
#38
Posted 09 July 2009 - 12:16 PM
A good start!
#39
Posted 09 July 2009 - 12:18 PM
I hate hate hate hate hate hate hate bottom feeding scumbag lawyers that support bogus lawsuits!
I hope moving the biz means they do not have to pay the plaintiff a single penny, if so there is a serious injustice going on here
Travel, food and drink blog by Dave - http://davestravels.tv
#40
Posted 09 July 2009 - 12:19 PM
#41
Posted 09 July 2009 - 12:21 PM
that would seem completely fair, or they should at least make some sort of contribution since they're so concerned
Travel, food and drink blog by Dave - http://davestravels.tv
#42
Posted 09 July 2009 - 12:30 PM
Or at least they should be accountable for blight and vagrancy. The city should also be able to sue them for the loss of tax revenue, which I'm sure is quantifiable.
#43
Posted 09 July 2009 - 12:59 PM
#44
Posted 09 July 2009 - 01:02 PM
The only positive thing from this is parking for the next door businesses will be better but that is it. This women will still fail to get a burger there with ADA compliant wheelchair access so everyone loses.
Time for a riddle - What do you call 1 million lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?
The article said that he was simply going to change locations. No one is going to be out of work. Oh the drama!!
#45
Posted 09 July 2009 - 01:27 PM
Can I sue them for making me unable to get my Squeeze Inn fix at the location to which I have a severe emotional attachment? Or if they don't reopen, can I sue because she's taken away my Squeeze?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users