Folsom Pd Near Target 5+ police cars,
#76
Posted 16 August 2012 - 12:56 PM
http://www.bustedmug...lo-riso/5031442
what's strange is that he bought a home in riverside in 2006 for over $1,000,000 and lost it in foreclosure the next year. another victim of the economy?
#77
Posted 16 August 2012 - 01:04 PM
here's an old mugshot of the perp
http://www.bustedmugshots.com/california/la-quinta/joseph-carmello-riso/5031442
what's strange is that he bought a home in riverside in 2006 for over $1,000,000 and lost it in foreclosure the next year. another victim of the economy?
Or his drug $ ran out.
#78
Posted 16 August 2012 - 01:05 PM
Except that perp was not armed. And adult male resident of home says he and his children had to duck to avoid bullets.
And they were outside. On the other side of walls between them and the perp and the sheriff.
Do you have a reference to this ? The story keeps changing - and I am sure a clearer picture will evolve.
Also, If they were outside , why would have to duck the bullets ?
Another great day in the adventure of exploration and sight.
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed people can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has"
-Margaret Mead-
#79
Posted 16 August 2012 - 01:10 PM
Do you have a reference to this ? The story keeps changing - and I am sure a clearer picture will evolve.
Also, If they were outside , why would have to duck the bullets ?
on the news, they were interviewing the family. mom was inside with one kid hiding in a bedroom. dad and three other kids were in the backyard. bullets shot inside came right through the window and I think walls too into the backyard.
#80
Posted 16 August 2012 - 01:13 PM
Do you have a reference to this ? The story keeps changing - and I am sure a clearer picture will evolve.
Also, If they were outside , why would have to duck the bullets ?
This article has the dad talking about the bullets and protecting his kids and pictures of the bullet holes in the window: http://sacramento.cb...ed-inside-home/
"Multiple bullets flew through the window and into the backyard where Sandoval’s kids played in the pool.
The small children ducked to dodge the bullets."
#81
Posted 16 August 2012 - 01:17 PM
His family must be devastated by this turn of events.
Do you have a reference to this ? The story keeps changing - and I am sure a clearer picture will evolve.
Also, If they were outside , why would have to duck the bullets ?
Yes, there are many versions to this story. Including one that says they got the wrong guy. And the guy that was killed was running in fear and not the same guy in the bank.
So, I don't know.
#82
Posted 16 August 2012 - 02:14 PM
If the suspect wasn't armed, and was shot entering in a bedroom, in the back, why then were so many bullets fired, sprayed wildly around, and for a long enough period of time for playing children to react and "dodge the bullets" (as if that were possible)?
Something is still not adding up here. Whatever - eventually they'll get it right.
#83
Posted 16 August 2012 - 03:07 PM
This is just another reminder of how bad news coverage tends to be, no matter what the story. We have now received multiple versions.
If the suspect wasn't armed, and was shot entering in a bedroom, in the back, why then were so many bullets fired, sprayed wildly around, and for a long enough period of time for playing children to react and "dodge the bullets" (as if that were possible)?
Something is still not adding up here. Whatever - eventually they'll get it right.
"DEWEY DEFEATS TRUMAN!!!"
#84
Posted 16 August 2012 - 04:54 PM
I admit its rather easy to sit here on my keyboard 48 hours later and monday morning quarterback things when I wasn't there and it wasn't me looking at the robber. Who knows how I would have handled this, so I don't want to sound judgemental.This is just another reminder of how bad news coverage tends to be, no matter what the story. We have now received multiple versions.
If the suspect wasn't armed, and was shot entering in a bedroom, in the back, why then were so many bullets fired, sprayed wildly around, and for a long enough period of time for playing children to react and "dodge the bullets" (as if that were possible)?
Something is still not adding up here. Whatever - eventually they'll get it right.
Something that I wondered is why would a LEO go bursting into a home after a suspect if they thought the bad guy had a gun? I'm thinking if the bad guy gets into a home and possibly has a gun, I'm waiting for the Swat team!
I had been wondering was the officer who did the shooting, ON duty or OFF duty?
I agree with Rich everything will come out in the end.
I'm saddened that a human being felt so desperate they had to rob a bank, that they lost their life, that a LEO has to deal with this the rest of their life and that the family in the house will have to deal with this as well.
It all seems such a waste!
#85 (The Dude)
Posted 16 August 2012 - 05:01 PM
#86
Posted 16 August 2012 - 06:01 PM
Except that perp was not armed. And adult male resident of home says he and his children had to duck to avoid bullets.
And they were outside. On the other side of walls between them and the perp and the sheriff.
And if he was armed, got to a famlily with kids, then you have a hostage situation with four dead...... I am thinking the officer did the right thing, bad guy dead. End of story. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes..... Chris
1A - 2A = -1A
#87
Posted 16 August 2012 - 06:10 PM
Wouldn't winging the dude in the leg have been sufficient enough to stop him? But IMO, it's better to kill 'em so we don't have to foot the bill for club fed.
Dude, you know that the police never shoot at the legs. They are taught to
shoot at the largest part of the body, chest, tummy, etc...
If you shoot them in the chest they seldom shoot back.
#88
Posted 16 August 2012 - 06:33 PM
Dude, you know that the police never shoot at the legs. They are taught to
shoot at the largest part of the body, chest, tummy, etc...
If you shoot them in the chest they seldom shoot back.
Bingo! The cop did exactly what he should have done. Can't do the time or take the penalties, don't do the crime.
#89
Posted 16 August 2012 - 07:46 PM
And if he was armed, got to a famlily with kids, then you have a hostage situation with four dead...... I am thinking the officer did the right thing, bad guy dead. End of story. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes..... Chris
I wasn't criticizing coppers. I was paraphrasing (almost word for word) news article, to highlight the confusion in the story.
#90 (The Dude)
Posted 16 August 2012 - 08:04 PM
Bingo! The cop did exactly what he should have done. Can't do the time or take the penalties, don't do the crime.
I wish they would shoot more of em, could save the state billions!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users