

Periwinkle Closing...so Sad
#1
Posted 04 May 2009 - 08:21 PM

#2
Posted 04 May 2009 - 08:24 PM
Really too bad. Losing a very unique store with great staff.
We could not be doing this without you.
Much love and gratitude.
#3
Posted 04 May 2009 - 08:37 PM
Barb
#4
Posted 04 May 2009 - 09:00 PM
Really too bad. Losing a very unique store with great staff.
How was the place unique if they went under because the Webkinz fad died? If you base your survival on a fad that's a bad business model if you ask me.
#5
Posted 04 May 2009 - 09:21 PM
#6
Posted 04 May 2009 - 10:45 PM
Just curious, and somewhat Off Topic but at what point does a land lord just let a business go under and leave their space vacant, than re-negotiating the tenants rent to a lower rate so the business can survive and the space stays filled filled. It's simple logic to me for the land owner to keep the space filled even at a slight loss or break even point than to let it stay empty till who knows when...... just thinking out loud, nothing more nothing less.
but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming
"Wow! What a Ride!"
weservicepools.com
#7
Posted 04 May 2009 - 10:45 PM
#8
Posted 05 May 2009 - 05:58 AM
M.E.G.
Mechelle Reasoner (formerly Gooch)
Movin'...So You Can!
Morris Williams Realty
Call or txt: 916 955-8698,
Read my blog, search for homes, find out more about Folsom at FolsomCorner.com
#9
Posted 05 May 2009 - 06:07 AM
M.E.G.
That's been my habit, too, with all the places going under.
#10
Posted 05 May 2009 - 06:50 AM
#11
Posted 05 May 2009 - 07:35 AM
I had a feeling. The last few times I went in there everything was on sale.
I loved going there for special gifts. I hate to say this, but they should've stayed small. It seems once they took over the space next day and remodeled the recession hit big time.
I went in there for a fundraiser donation one day and she(the owner) walked around grabbing stuff for me to use in the raffle ( a webkin, lotions). It was very kind. The original owners were also very nice.
#12
Posted 05 May 2009 - 08:08 AM
These landlords are hanging on and not negotiating b/c they paid too much for the buildings and it's a snowball effect. Why give the businesses a break, when they can't get a break.......There will be more mini malls and large malls that will go under. Look athe Roseville mall. Even when it's busy, no one is really buying much except for something at the food court and maybe some clothes....I don't get how some of those stores stay in business. There's a store that sells tea, yes tea for like $17 for so many ounces...Not to mention so many kiddies clothing stores. Do you really need to buy your kid a $50 sweatshirt when u can get one for $10 at Target?
#13
Posted 05 May 2009 - 08:18 AM
#14
Posted 05 May 2009 - 09:19 AM
Well, that landlord will be sorry now if s/he was inflexible. Aren't there at least 3 vacancies in that strip mall?
#15
Posted 05 May 2009 - 09:29 AM
Ya know, I often wonder about this, too. Not to hijack this thread. It would seem that the landlord would *want* to keep a space occupied and would try everything to keep a tenant in place - maybe there are limits. I also wonder about building a strip mall that sits empty or nearly so (Sibley and Glenn, and next to the high-school on Iron Point).
Perhaps someone with some commercial real estate can esplain? Is there some sort of incentive to build a brand new building on vacant land and have it sit empty? Does the landowner get some sort of tax break or something? Is a landlord somehow better off with an empty space as opposed to a tenant that cannot pay rent? Maybe this is so, but I dont understand, either.
harrmill
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users