
FCUSD VS RJUHSD Budget Problems
#1
Posted 16 February 2010 - 04:35 PM
The only reason that I have heard is that Folsom lacks Mella-Roos Fees, so Roseville has extra revenue from those fees that we are lacking in Folsom. Any ideas?
#2
Posted 16 February 2010 - 04:42 PM
The only reason that I have heard is that Folsom lacks Mella-Roos Fees, so Roseville has extra revenue from those fees that we are lacking in Folsom. Any ideas?
I thought all the Folsom development since at least the mid 1990's has had Mello-Roos. Someone once told me that even communities like Brigg's Ranch that claim to not have any, sort-of do. They were just pre-paid by the developer (and probably past along in the price of the new homes).
#3
Posted 16 February 2010 - 04:58 PM
Ken - I pay $150/month and when I lived in the old Parkway, it was around $75. It sure would be nice to see an equal return on my money. I don't see $150/month worth of anything in my neighborhood.
#4
Posted 17 February 2010 - 03:53 AM
I am not sure how any comparisons whatsoever can be made between FCUSD and RJUHSD
RJUHSD covers 8 highschools in Roseville and Granite bay (very similar)
FCUSD covers 21 elementary schools, 5 middle schools, 4 high schools plus alternative/continuing schools in Folsom and RC (two very dissimilar towns)
about the only thing they have in common is the word "school"
But I think you answered your own question, you are thinking about FCUSD from the "Folsom" perspective, if you look at it from the "RC" perspective or even the combined perspective, this district is indeed much more like the other districts you mention.
#5
Posted 17 February 2010 - 08:28 AM
In fact, looking at their budget stuff it appears that in 2009-10 they've made budget reductions similar to FCUSD, proportional to student enrollment. Take a look at the reductions they've implemented; looks remarkably similar to FCUSD.
#6
Posted 17 February 2010 - 09:48 AM
#7
Posted 17 February 2010 - 11:33 AM
The only reason that I have heard is that Folsom lacks Mella-Roos Fees, so Roseville has extra revenue from those fees that we are lacking in Folsom. Any ideas?
Please show me how you can compare folsom to roseville economically?
For over 20 years as granite bay was developing, roseville received the development fees....
Roseville has quite a few schools.
Prolly 100 times more businesses paying taxes....
Prolly at least twice as many residents....
How can you compare?
#8
Posted 17 February 2010 - 11:41 AM
In fact, looking at their budget stuff it appears that in 2009-10 they've made budget reductions similar to FCUSD, proportional to student enrollment. Take a look at the reductions they've implemented; looks remarkably similar to FCUSD.
Take a look at just about every district in the state, they're all making the same reductions
loss of CSR, killing off of electives, music, sports, deferred maintenance, lay offs. The song is the same everywhere! The state of Utah is even considering losing the 12th grade all together.
it is a state issue (and in some regards federal issue), precisely because we have allowed the state to become the overseer of education, rather than retain local oversight, and local financing. And the state of CA has been financially decimated. Since education spending is on the order o 40% of CA's "general fund", when that fund is hit as hard as it has been, it is inevitable that schools are going to bear the brunt of spending reductions.
#9
Posted 17 February 2010 - 11:45 AM
#10
(Cheesesteak)
Posted 17 February 2010 - 12:37 PM
I've not looked closely at the Mello-Roos taxes for areas like The Parkway and Empire Ranch - but generally, Mello-Roos taxes are imposed to pay off bonds issued to pay for physical improvements associated with new construction. It's so the new development pays for whatever additional public facilities are necessary to serve the new development. So, for example, the Mello-Roos taxes associated with certain areas in Empire Ranch likely pay off the bonds for the construction of Empire Oaks, Russell Ranch, Vista, etc.
It also pays for other major infrastructure made necessary (roads, bridges, etc).
Mello-Roos taxes usually (perhaps always) have a sunset - when the bonds are fully paid off. One that I am aware of (in Empire Ranch) sunsets in 2022 (20 years from issuance).
#11
Posted 18 February 2010 - 12:53 PM
I read DAILY articles from around the state talking about the drastic measures districts are taking due to their own budget cuts. It's a statewide problem. In order to protect the kids, the adults need to sacrifice, so furlough days, shortening the school year, freezing automatic salary increases, etc., must all be on the table. So far, FCUSD unions have not agreed to any of that for the upcoming year. The late agreement for this school year was the reason the school year couldn't just start a week later since school had already started before the agreement.
Mello-Roos does not go to schools. In one instance in Folsom it was redirected once to build Goldridge Elementary School, then was paid back with credits for developers fees as the homes were built. It was a mechanism used by Elliott Homes to get a school in their subdivision before they had all of the families move in without a school.
#12
(Cheesesteak)
Posted 18 February 2010 - 01:04 PM
Actually - Mello-Roos are used for schools - and are a primary tool used to finance school construction. Here's a blurb from FCUSD on school construction financing:
FCUSD School Construction Financing & Mello-Roos
And, here's a bit about Mello-Roos in Rocklin - since some are holding that out as as example:
Rocklin - a bit about Mello-Roos
#13
Posted 18 February 2010 - 08:31 PM
Folsom Mello Roos bonds are NOT for the schools. They are imposed by the city/developer.
#14
Posted 18 February 2010 - 09:04 PM
I read DAILY articles from around the state talking about the drastic measures districts are taking due to their own budget cuts. It's a statewide problem. In order to protect the kids, the adults need to sacrifice, so furlough days, shortening the school year, freezing automatic salary increases, etc., must all be on the table. So far, FCUSD unions have not agreed to any of that for the upcoming year. The late agreement for this school year was the reason the school year couldn't just start a week later since school had already started before the agreement.
Mello-Roos does not go to schools. In one instance in Folsom it was redirected once to build Goldridge Elementary School, then was paid back with credits for developers fees as the homes were built. It was a mechanism used by Elliott Homes to get a school in their subdivision before they had all of the families move in without a school.
Teresa...
The Folsom Cordove teachers union is going to have to tell their members that they are lucky to have a job... and that we're going to have to roll back some salaries... that goes for staff... and some benefits too...
We just can't afford the Lexus prices on a "beer budget"...
You guys need to cut... and cut some more...
and you ought to come up with something else to help educate the little brats here in town...besides more $$$$
#15
Posted 18 February 2010 - 11:26 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users