
Folsom Soon To Expand By 3,500 Acres
#1
Posted 18 January 2012 - 11:20 PM
#2
Posted 19 January 2012 - 12:20 AM
#3
Posted 19 January 2012 - 06:34 AM
#4
Posted 19 January 2012 - 06:46 AM
#5
Posted 19 January 2012 - 07:37 AM
#6
Posted 19 January 2012 - 09:46 AM
Genesis 49:16-17
http://www.active2030folsom.org
#7
Posted 19 January 2012 - 10:32 AM
Goodbye beautiful green hills.
Goodbye businesses and services on the older side of town.
hello extra traffic and water meters.
I've only been here going on 11 years, so I wasn't around back then, but did folks have the same concerns when Empire Ranch and Broadstone were created? The land was virtually identical.
Steve Heard
Folsom Real Estate Specialist
EXP Realty
BRE#01368503
Owner - MyFolsom.com
916 718 9577
#8
Posted 19 January 2012 - 10:36 AM
#9
Posted 19 January 2012 - 10:42 AM
in short, those of us north of 50 had better be on the old lookout
#10
(The Dude)
Posted 19 January 2012 - 10:45 AM
Hello vastly increased water and city service bills. I expect my city bill to shoot up to $150 a month very soon.
#11
Posted 19 January 2012 - 10:50 AM
#12
Posted 19 January 2012 - 10:51 AM
If I had my way, I'd probably be in favor of leaving the land as it is, but I know that man likes to build and that the demand for housing in this area will only increase in the coming years, and that the land owners know they can make a profit, which is why people go into business and take risks.To a certain extent, Steve, but this is going to be the last big open space. Also, the developed mass is growing so much and into a new previously natural area that it is going to be a huge change. Even back 20 years ago there was a slow the growth movement, but developer pressure was strong and quick.
I'm not pro-development and don't have a dog in the hunt, so to speak.
I'm just a bit puzzled as to why there aren't complaints when Rancho Cordova and El Dorado Hills develop their land south of 50.
Steve Heard
Folsom Real Estate Specialist
EXP Realty
BRE#01368503
Owner - MyFolsom.com
916 718 9577
#13
Posted 19 January 2012 - 10:57 AM
I'm just a bit puzzled as to why there aren't complaints when Rancho Cordova and El Dorado Hills develop their land south of 50.
the land south of Rancho has always been torn up by either Aerojet, Mather or dredging, so I'm not surprised there was little contention there. I think EDH has never really been a town, its just historically been a bedroom community and its an unincorporated part of El Dorado County. I think the county is happy to have the tax growth and I think the residents up there were happy to have more commercial choices (they didn't have much before).
#14
Posted 19 January 2012 - 11:20 AM
My Biggest fear as noted by others is that No50 will end up paying for much of the infrastructure of So50 when that was expressly by the council that So50 would be covering ALL costs...
Also, the lack of any firm water plan for So50, it could put a burden on the rest of us...
Another great day in the adventure of exploration and sight.
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed people can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has"
-Margaret Mead-
#15
Posted 19 January 2012 - 11:20 AM
Where do you live?Goodbye beautiful green hills.
OK, maybe 2 to 3 months out of the year they might be green, but 9 to 10 months they are golden.

0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users