Jump to content






Photo

Sacramento Housing Inventory Lowest Of The Low

folsom real estate housing folsom ca homes

  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 Steve Heard

Steve Heard

    Owner

  • Admin
  • 13,752 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 08 March 2013 - 02:19 PM

From Sacbee.com
How low is home-for-sale inventory in the Sacramento area?
It’s the lowest of the low, according to a report released today by Seattle-based data tracker Zillow.
The overall number of homes listed for sale in the Sacramento area on Zillow was down 48 percent year-over-year in late February.
By comparison, the national decline was 16.6 percent.
In the Sacramento metro area, Zillow broke down the year-over-year declines this way: top-tier homes, down 33.4 percent; middle-tier homes, down 53.2 percent; bottom-tier homes, down 61.5 percent.
California metro areas accounted for the top four U.S. markets seeing the biggest decrease in homes for sale over the past year. San Francisco was down 40.9 percent, and San Diego declined 39.4 percent.
http://www.sacbee.co...-inventory.html
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.co...l#storylink=cpy
Folsom is seeing similar declines.

From our 10 year peak of 561 homes on the market at once in 2008, we currently have 61 homes on the market (56 single-family and 5 condos).

Of those 61, only 7 were short-sales and 4 bank owned.

Posted Image

Steve Heard

Folsom Real Estate Specialist

EXP Realty

BRE#01368503

Owner - MyFolsom.com

916 718 9577 


#2 Carl G

Carl G

    Hall Of Famer

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,674 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 08 March 2013 - 03:02 PM

Let's hope this is the beginning of a turnaround. I periodically poke around Zillow and the prices are definitely climbing.

#3 Darth Lefty

Darth Lefty

    Disco Infiltrator

  • No Politics!
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,578 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The OV
  • Interests:Volunteer with a service club like Active 20-30, and you CAN make a difference!

Posted 11 March 2013 - 11:42 AM

Zillow says,

Zillow predicts 95662 home values will increase 14.4% next year, compared to a 13.9% increase for Orangevale as a whole.

That's a lot. Especially when the interest rates are so low. Seems bubbly. Forward-looking statements, etc etc and they are part of the home-selling industry, so probably deserves taking with salt.
"I enjoy a bit of cooking, and this has always worried me. But it's OK. I only like it because it allows me to play with knives." - James May

Genesis 49:16-17
http://www.active2030folsom.org

#4 Steve Heard

Steve Heard

    Owner

  • Admin
  • 13,752 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 11 March 2013 - 02:05 PM

Zillow says,

That's a lot. Especially when the interest rates are so low. Seems bubbly. Forward-looking statements, etc etc and they are part of the home-selling industry, so probably deserves taking with salt.


After what's happened over the last 10 years a healthy dose of skepticism is well-warranted. I'm not ready to declare the crisis over by any means and things can change at any time.

The numbers for the current market are real, though.

I don't know what to expect for tomorrow.

Buyers and their agents are frustrated at the lack of available inventory, and the few sellers are celebrating.

Sure is different from just a couple of years ago.

Steve Heard

Folsom Real Estate Specialist

EXP Realty

BRE#01368503

Owner - MyFolsom.com

916 718 9577 


#5 Carl G

Carl G

    Hall Of Famer

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,674 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 11 March 2013 - 02:36 PM

After what's happened over the last 10 years a healthy dose of skepticism is well-warranted. I'm not ready to declare the crisis over by any means and things can change at any time.

The numbers for the current market are real, though.

I don't know what to expect for tomorrow.

Buyers and their agents are frustrated at the lack of available inventory, and the few sellers are celebrating.

Sure is different from just a couple of years ago.

Steve - historically, doesn't inventory increase in the spring and summer as people move when kids are not in school?

#6 SacKen

SacKen

    Lifer

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,286 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cell Block D

Posted 11 March 2013 - 03:41 PM

I still think this is false hope and troublesome when so many of the buyers are investors. For various reasons, I don't see that as a solid foundation. So, "real" owners are, once again, settling for inflated prices being driven-up directly and indirectly by these investors and someone at the bank is, once again, approving loans at these prices that I don't think would be sustained if the investors stop being as active or, as happened in many cities a few years ago, they start selling and there aren't as many buyers anymore and prices drop a little and they get freaked out and start, once again, dumping to cut their losses.

I think we'll be ok if it is a quick jump to get back to a reasonable price (which is about where we are at, I think) and doesn't continue to get crazy like it did before.

I hope I'm wrong, but my highly calibrated spidey sense is tingling. Although, my underwear are a little tight today, so it might be a false alarm.
"Just think of how stupid the average person is, and then realize half of them are even stupider!" -- George Carlin

#7 Steve Heard

Steve Heard

    Owner

  • Admin
  • 13,752 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 11 March 2013 - 05:03 PM

Steve - historically, doesn't inventory increase in the spring and summer as people move when kids are not in school?


Looking back decades, yes. Looking back the last few years, no.

I created a chart here (or is it a graph) which shows how many homes were on the market in each of the past 10 February's. I didn't have time to make it nicer.


Posted Image


I still think this is false hope and troublesome when so many of the buyers are investors. For various reasons, I don't see that as a solid foundation. So, "real" owners are, once again, settling for inflated prices being driven-up directly and indirectly by these investors and someone at the bank is, once again, approving loans at these prices that I don't think would be sustained if the investors stop being as active or, as happened in many cities a few years ago, they start selling and there aren't as many buyers anymore and prices drop a little and they get freaked out and start, once again, dumping to cut their losses.

I think we'll be ok if it is a quick jump to get back to a reasonable price (which is about where we are at, I think) and doesn't continue to get crazy like it did before.

I hope I'm wrong, but my highly calibrated spidey sense is tingling. Although, my underwear are a little tight today, so it might be a false alarm.


Many folks are going along with the line of thinking that this is really a case of getting back to more reasonable values than it is an indication that prices are going to soar.

While there are many 'buy and hold' investors out there, there are also many first-timers, relocations, downsizers and folks returning to the market after foreclosure or short-sale.

The competition changes by price-point and market. For example, most Folsom and El Dorado Hills sales are over $300K, and most would not be attractive to investors due to the monthly payments vs the rent they would bring. Sellers will still get multiple offers on them, however, because they are affordable to so many owner-occupant buyers.

I listed a property in El Dorado Hills for $399K last month. In 3 days I had 3 offers, all over asking price. Final price $425K.

On the hand, people trying to buy in Elk Grove are facing fierce competition from big-time investors, small investors, flippers and a slew of first-timers.

One agent I know listed a home in Elk Grove for $150,000. He had 70, yes, 70 offers on it. He said that from his recollection, less than half were investors.

These 2 examples tell me that even without investors, there is a lot of demand....today.

It's just a perfect storm or low prices, low rates, a lot of buyers and very little inventory.

Steve Heard

Folsom Real Estate Specialist

EXP Realty

BRE#01368503

Owner - MyFolsom.com

916 718 9577 


#8 Darth Lefty

Darth Lefty

    Disco Infiltrator

  • No Politics!
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,578 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The OV
  • Interests:Volunteer with a service club like Active 20-30, and you CAN make a difference!

Posted 11 March 2013 - 09:16 PM

So, "real" owners are, once again, settling for inflated prices being driven-up directly and indirectly by these investors...


Always true but what can you do? Rent, or live somewhere worse or have a long commute.

Proportionally for my payment I'm getting a lot more value than I did renting, and the money was wasted rather than invested. I did buy at the very, very bottom, though, getting a house in 2012 at a 2001 or earlier price. I'll keep feeling clever about that, even if it has a little more deflation to go, because it will be a great value pretty soon. I feel like I lucked out - I was convinced in 2007 that I was never going to be able to afford a house in California, much less the Sacramento suburbs, and that I'd been a fool for buying a new car in 2002 rather than a house.

Many folks are going along with the line of thinking that this is really a case of getting back to more reasonable values than it is an indication that prices are going to soar.


Mmmmaybe. Two years of growth after a five year crash does not a bubble make. But if you look at that 13%+ number as a raw investment when loans are going for 3.5% and inflation is below 2%, then the rate of return really does look too good to be true.
"I enjoy a bit of cooking, and this has always worried me. But it's OK. I only like it because it allows me to play with knives." - James May

Genesis 49:16-17
http://www.active2030folsom.org

#9 Steve Heard

Steve Heard

    Owner

  • Admin
  • 13,752 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 March 2013 - 09:26 AM

Proportionally for my payment I'm getting a lot more value than I did renting, and the money was wasted rather than invested. I did buy at the very, very bottom, though, getting a house in 2012 at a 2001 or earlier price. I'll keep feeling clever about that, even if it has a little more deflation to go, because it will be a great value pretty soon. I feel like I lucked out - I was convinced in 2007 that I was never going to be able to afford a house in California, much less the Sacramento suburbs, and that I'd been a fool for buying a new car in 2002 rather than a house.


I know that you and I had discussed purchasing a number of times before you made your decision.

The rent vs. mortgage differential is another driving factor. Many folks are paying less than they were for rent, plus they get the right-offs or interest and property taxes (I'm advised to add the disclaimer that I am not a tax professional and you should seek professional advice regarding deductions).

Bottom line is that purchasing makes sense for a lot of folks for a lot of reasons, but there isn't much inventory to choose from.

Steve Heard

Folsom Real Estate Specialist

EXP Realty

BRE#01368503

Owner - MyFolsom.com

916 718 9577 


#10 sacramentotmt

sacramentotmt

    Netizen

  • Registered Members
  • PipPip
  • 26 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sacramento, CA
  • Interests:Home and business moving, local and long distance moving, as well as packing. Local charities are a big priority.

Posted 27 March 2013 - 01:23 PM

Our moving company has been busier than usual with all of the houses being bought suddenly. It's a good sign for the Sacramento area which has had a suffering housing market for far too long.
TWO MEN AND A TRUCK®
We are the "Movers Who Care®"
The 8167 Belvedere Ave, Ste D
Sacramento, CA 95826
(916) 852-7411
http://www.twomensacramento.com





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: folsom real estate, housing, folsom ca homes

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users