Jump to content






Photo
- - - - -

The Nfl Is A Non-Profit - Tax Exempt ?


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 camay2327

camay2327

    GO NAVY

  • Moderator
  • 11,481 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Folsom

Posted 22 May 2013 - 05:40 AM

You must be kidding....

 

The U.S. Senate may — and should — review the NFL’s tax-exempt status

Recently, you may have heard that the Internal Revenue Service came under some considerable fire for targeting certain groups seeking tax-exempt status while green-lighting others (such as one run by the brother of President Obama), but did you know that the National Football league, an organization that currently rakes in about $10 billion per year in revenue, is also a non-profit organization in the eyes of the government? While you're trying to figure that one out, we've got another one for you. Did you know that the league has been a non-profit organization since 1966, when the NFL merged with the American Football League, and then-commissioner Pete Rozelle folded in the request for an exemption with the request for an anti-trust exemption?

 

// go to below web site for the rest //

 

http://sports.yahoo....-004521453.html

 

 

 


A VETERAN Whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a blank check made payable to "The United States of America" for an amount "up to and including their life". That is HONOR, and there are way too many people in this country who no longer understand it. -Author unknown-

#2 TruthSeeker

TruthSeeker

    Superstar

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 967 posts

Posted 22 May 2013 - 06:49 AM

Wow! If they are a non-profit, I'm the pope!

At some point the NFL must have promised that all the players etc would vote for a certain political party and that's how and why they got exempted.

Svzr2FS.jpg


#3 Darth Lefty

Darth Lefty

    Disco Infiltrator

  • No Politics!
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,578 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The OV
  • Interests:Volunteer with a service club like Active 20-30, and you CAN make a difference!

Posted 22 May 2013 - 07:01 AM

The NCAA is far worse a lie and an abuse, since they exploit students.  So attack them first.


"I enjoy a bit of cooking, and this has always worried me. But it's OK. I only like it because it allows me to play with knives." - James May

Genesis 49:16-17
http://www.active2030folsom.org

#4 folsom500

folsom500

    Folsom Gardner

  • Moderator
  • 6,562 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Folsom

Posted 22 May 2013 - 08:31 AM

Football is a religion to millions you know ...


Another great  day in the adventure of exploration and sight.

 

 

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed people can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has"
-Margaret Mead-


#5 SacKen

SacKen

    Lifer

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,286 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cell Block D

Posted 22 May 2013 - 09:38 AM

This is very misleading. Those revenue numbers are a total of all the team revenues, not the parent organization that coordinates their operations. The teams are independent companies and pay taxes on their earnings. So the NFL does not "rake in $10 billion". Each individual company has revenue of about $200-500 million that is taxed like a normal corporation, for a total of about $10 billion in taxable revenue. Even things like TV revenue is split amongst the teams and is not revenue for the non-profit NFL. The actual revenue for the tax-exempt NFL is mostly just franchise fees and is around $200 million gross. The unpaid taxes are really those fees that are deducted from the teams' books since it is technically a donation to a non-profit.

 

That said, we should eliminate the whole tax-exempt sham, along with the rest of the tax code and personal deduction-based model. If they operate like a normal organization and have no profits, then little or no taxes would be due anyway since taxable income is zero. So the net effect is about the same without all the hassle.


"Just think of how stupid the average person is, and then realize half of them are even stupider!" -- George Carlin

#6 (Cheesesteak)

(Cheesesteak)
  • Visitors

Posted 22 May 2013 - 12:09 PM

It's only partly misleading.  The NFL considers itself a "trade organization" made up of the legaue's 32 teams.  Yes - each team is taxed individually on its earnings.

 

But - because the NFL is a 501©(3), it is able ot sell bonds at reduced rates and it then turns around and lends that money to the various teams to build stadiums and whatnot.

 

All-in-all - it is a sham.



#7 SacKen

SacKen

    Lifer

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,286 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cell Block D

Posted 22 May 2013 - 02:46 PM

It's only partly misleading.  The NFL considers itself a "trade organization" made up of the legaue's 32 teams.  Yes - each team is taxed individually on its earnings.

 

But - because the NFL is a 501©(3), it is able ot sell bonds at reduced rates and it then turns around and lends that money to the various teams to build stadiums and whatnot.

 

All-in-all - it is a sham.

 

True, but the point is that the $10 billion is owned by taxed corporations and is not tax exempt, as the stories make it out to be. I've seen a bunch of articles about this and none of them talk about things like discounted bonds, nor does the congressdope raising a stink mention it. The premise is always that $10 billion dollars is going untaxed, which is misleading at best. I don't think discounted bonds are what upsets the blogointerwebtubes.


"Just think of how stupid the average person is, and then realize half of them are even stupider!" -- George Carlin

#8 titusan

titusan

    Veteran

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 164 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Folsom

Posted 24 May 2013 - 08:15 AM

NFL is not a ©(3), it's a ©(6) - a trade association, not a charity.  That means the NFL doesn't pay income tax on it's dues income, but it may pay income tax on other types of income, and donations to it are not tax deductible like charitable donations are.  May involve some business deduction for the teams.



#9 tgianco

tgianco

    Living Legend

  • Moderator
  • 4,152 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Willow Springs
  • Interests:Baseball, soccer, football, poker, wine, good food, reading

Posted 25 May 2013 - 06:20 AM

I have a much bigger problem with Apple's tax scam. The NFL creates SOOOOOO much money in this country, people should be thankful. How much business does the Super Bowl generate? Who benefits? Restaurants, grocery stores, party supply stores, food companies, food and alcohol distributors, Vegas, sports books, bars... I'm sure I am missing quite a few others.

 

In what way does Apple provide the same benefits? Um, in no way.

 

I'll say this... what's good for the NFL is, in general, good for the country... (caveat: in no way do i support holding a team's fans/ general public hostage for a new stadium).


In the immortal words of Jean Paul Sartre, 'Au revoir, gopher'.

If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball.

#10 The Average Joe

The Average Joe

    Hopeless Addict

  • Premium Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,155 posts

Posted 26 May 2013 - 09:25 AM

Apple's tax "scam" is what ANY smart company would do when faced with the byzantine, punitive and ridiculous tax system we have. CONGRESS is responsible for that mess. 74,000 pages to figure out? Puhlease. Make it a straight percentage WITHOUT the 74,000 pages of exceptions written for various friends of congress over the years. My only fear would be that they would make the percentages arbitrarily high to support their spending addiction.


"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive" -- C.S. Lewis

 

If the only way to combat "global warming" was to lower taxes, we would never hear of the issue again. - Anonymous

 

"Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one" — Thomas Paine, 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘰𝘯 𝘚𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘦 (1776)

 





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users