
Railway - Folsom To Placerville
#16
Posted 21 May 2012 - 08:18 AM
#17
(The Dude)
Posted 21 May 2012 - 08:28 AM
Harsh.
I echo the "what trains?" question.
You really didn't know there are small train excursions being run on those rails? It's actually really neat and a fun ride.
What was harsh? there are tons of bike trails all over our town but only one rail road track
#18
Posted 21 May 2012 - 08:49 AM
enjoy the trails
but please also support
bringing back the trains as well
it could only add to the beauty of it all
#19
Posted 21 May 2012 - 09:04 AM
#20
Posted 21 May 2012 - 09:29 AM
#21
Posted 21 May 2012 - 09:31 AM


#22
Posted 21 May 2012 - 09:32 AM
I think I've seen one billboard once that mentioned trains running for a special occasion. I didn't realize it was regular and that one could ride to Placerville. Why the hell aren't we promoting it?You really didn't know there are small train excursions being run on those rails? It's actually really neat and a fun ride.
What was harsh? there are tons of bike trails all over our town but only one rail road track
#23
Posted 21 May 2012 - 09:33 AM
SAVE THE RAILS
#24
Posted 21 May 2012 - 09:44 AM
#25
Posted 21 May 2012 - 09:50 AM
SAVE THE RAILS
#26
Posted 21 May 2012 - 09:59 AM
There's a point where history becomes clutter and preserving it becomes hoarding. You CANNOT ride a train all the way to Placerville. The tracks are not in good enough shape for that. I have no problem with the little sections here and there but not allowing hikers and cyclists to use the majority of rail that isn't being used is asinine.
why can't hikers and cyclists use the trail along with the rail? It isn't like they are going to run hourly commute or freight trains out there?
#27
(The Dude)
Posted 21 May 2012 - 10:04 AM
There's a point where history becomes clutter and preserving it becomes hoarding. You CANNOT ride a train all the way to Placerville. The tracks are not in good enough shape for that. I have no problem with the little sections here and there but not allowing hikers and cyclists to use the majority of rail that isn't being used is asinine.
There is no clutter, don't you have enough trails to ride already?
History is more important then having one more bike trail
why can't hikers and cyclists use the trail along with the rail? It isn't like they are going to run hourly commute or freight trains out there?
They probably want it to be paved over
I think I've seen one billboard once that mentioned trains running for a special occasion. I didn't realize it was regular and that one could ride to Placerville. Why the hell aren't we promoting it?
I see them frequently on Saturday by in-n-out doing rides
#28
Posted 21 May 2012 - 10:22 AM
That's where I saw the sign but I'm rarely over there. Haven't seen one anywhere else ever.I see them frequently on Saturday by in-n-out doing rides
#29
Posted 21 May 2012 - 10:23 AM
#30
Posted 21 May 2012 - 10:29 AM
There's a point where history becomes clutter and preserving it becomes hoarding. You CANNOT ride a train all the way to Placerville. The tracks are not in good enough shape for that. I have no problem with the little sections here and there but not allowing hikers and cyclists to use the majority of rail that isn't being used is asinine.
Chris, there is very little historic preservation in Folsom. Can you tell me where the clutter is?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users