Think about your typical high-crime area, say parts of Rancho Cordova or South Sac, is that where the nice homes, cars and high tech electronics are?
While such things may indeed attract theives, far more theft goes on in other areas. Theives will take whatever they can, and most do it in their own areas because they know the areas. Naturally, more crimes are committed by people in their own home towns and neighborhoods.
My objection was not to the color of the man's skin. Newsblaze supported his belief that we've got an outsider crime wave by pointing out the 2 recent stories about 2 recent crimes. In one case, the perpetrator was black, and being that he was busted at the home he was renting, he may not qualify as an 'outsider', and may in fact be a local.
The other perpetrators were white.
I suppose I could take those two stories and write a headline, "White Criminals in Folsom Outnumber Black Ones 2 to 1."
I would be correct, if I used only those cases as representative of crime in Folsom. They are not, and are not indicative of an outsider crime wave.
I can't promise you I won't comment on things you say on the forum if I disagree with them, and you are free to disagree with me.
Bottom line is that if one is to write a headline that outsiders are bringing crime, one needs to cite facts and numbers, not just show one crackhead who may qualify as a local.
Your observations make some sense and I tend to agree, however, to admonish a local news source for the title they chose to report a crime, is trying to take away their right to free speech....in my book. I think it was a good title to wake residents up and place them on the alert to lock their doors and be aware that we don't live in a crime free city, just because most who live here are law abiding.
As I recall, there was another disapproving post not too long ago, in regards to what Newsblaze printed. I disagreed at that time, that they should be admonished for what they printed. I am a strong supporter for free press and wish we had more of it in the general news media.
I don't like it when the news is censored or altered to make people more comfortable with what is being reported, nor do I think it makes for good policy. I hate The Sacramento Bee, but wouldn't tell them not to print something because I think it gives the wrong impression...even though I feel they mostly do. I've caught many an error on their part in the past....mostly by omission of all the facts.
You are free, of course to have your opinion, and I am free to have mine as well.
We'll just have to agree to disagree, as has been the case so many times in the past.
As far as race goes, far more crime is reported to be done by whites in Folsom, as far as I can tell. I would imagine that with Folsom being a place with many attractions and reasons to visit, it would attract some criminal outsiders who think it's a good place to come. And they may feel it would be harder for them to get caught, if they weren't living where they commit their crime. Also, less of a chance for someone they know to witness them at the scene of the crime. That would be my guess as to why criminals would go outside their living area to commit crimes.
Folsom is, after all, a tourist spot and that in it self, can generate crime from outsiders. Before I moved here, my car was stolen from the Folsom Outlets, by a man from Rancho. They caught him driving my car in Roseville, would you believe? He was shoplifting with his girlfriend over in that new shopping center, and my car was discovered to be stolen when they were caught.
As far as our responding to each others posts, you do have the right to do as you wish. But since there is a perception, by another poster, that I always come after you, I think I'll decline to respond to yours. I'm sure others feel I come after you as well, so I'll keep my distance. No disrespect intended...it just makes for my blood pressure to stay at a healthy level.